Cited by 52Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEthics in Business and Education

Do Theories of Implicit Race Bias Change Moral Judgments?

Cameron, C. Daryl, Payne, B. Keith, Knobe, Joshua·2010·Social Justice Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11211-010-0118-z

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To the extent that the validity of the objective measure is questionable, inferences of unawareness are based on a weak foundation, which can lead to inaccurate attitude theories and potentially harmful individual and societal consequences.

    “To the extent that the validity of the objective measure seems questionable, inferences of unawareness would be based on a weak foundation, which can lead to inaccurate attitude theories (Gawronski & Bodenhausen 2015) and potentially harmful consequences at the individual and the societal level (Cameron et al. 2010, Daumeyer et al. 2019).”

    From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as Cameron et al. 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, C. D., Payne, B. K., & Knobe, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Cameron, C. Daryl
Venue
Social Justice Research
Published
2010-11-30
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
272-289
ISSN
  • 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6725
OpenAlex
W2046457481
Cited by
52
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Justice Research (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
moral judgment, racial discrimination, moral responsibility, implicit bias, automaticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review