Cited by 3Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Coercion in Psychiatry: Exploring the Subjective Experience of Coercion Among Patients in Five Portuguese Psychiatric Departments

Aluh, Deborah Oyine, Diaz-Milanes, Diego, Azeredo-Lopes, Sofia, Barbosa, Sofia, Santos-Dias, Margarida, Silva, Manuela, Grigaitė, Ugnė, Pedrosa, Barbara +3 more·2025·The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

Abstract

The subjective experience of coercion may have a more significant impact on clinical outcomes than formal coercive measures. This study aimed to investigate the subjective experience of coercion among patients on admission in Portuguese psychiatric departments by assessing their perceived coercion, procedural justice, and negative pressures during admission. The study also investigated whether this subjective experience of coercion changed with time during admission, and the predictors of this change. Validated instruments, including the McArthur Admission Experience Survey (AES) and the Client Assessment of Treatment Scale, were used to collect information from 208 adults admitted to five public psychiatric inpatient departments in rural and urban regions of Portugal. About a third (32.24%, n = 49) of the sample had a legal involuntary admission status, while more than a third of them perceived their admission to be involuntary (40.13%, n = 61). The subjective experience of coercion was significantly higher among people who perceived their admission to be involuntary compared to people who perceived their admission to be voluntary (Median = 10, IQR = 5.5 vs. Median = 3, IQR = 6; p < 0.001). Satisfaction with their care was significantly inversely correlated with the subjective experience of coercion (p < 0.01). The changes in the subjective experience of coercion at the second assessment were predicted by the perceived admission status rather than the legal admission status, and the initial procedural justice (p < 0.05). The study findings highlight the importance of improving procedural justice in psychiatric admissions, regardless of the legal status of admission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11414-024-09890-7

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aluh, D. O., Diaz-Milanes, D., Azeredo-Lopes, S., Barbosa, S., Santos-Dias, M., Silva, M., Grigaitė, U., Pedrosa, B., Velosa, A., Cardoso, G., & Caldas-de-Almeida, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nigeria (NG)
  • Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca (PT)
  • Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health (PT)
  • Hospital de Egas Moniz (PT)
Corresponding author
Aluh, Deborah Oyine
Venue
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Published
2024-07-10
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
505-524
ISSN
  • 1094-3412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3308
OpenAlex
W4400491839
Cited by
3
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • 'la Caixa' Foundation (LCF/BQ/DI20/11780013)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UI/BD/151072/2021, UI/BD/151073/2021)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
coercion in mental health care, psychiatric hospital admissions, procedural justice, involuntary admission, patient satisfaction, Portugal
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Portugal, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review