Cited by 203Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Physiopathological mechanism of sarcopenia

Open access
Boirie, Y.·2009·The Journal of nutrition, health and aging

Abstract

The aetiology of sarcopenia is multifactorial but still poorly understood while the sequelae of this phenomenon, i.e. loss of independence and metabolic complications, represent a major public health. The most evident metabolic explanation for muscle decline in elderly people is an imbalance between protein synthesis abd breakdown rates but other causes like neurodegenerative processes, reduction in anabolic hormone productions or sensitivity such as insulin, growth and sex hormones, dysregulation of cytokine secretions, modification in the response to inflammatory events, inadequate nutritional intakes and sedentary lifestyle are involved. Consequently, the age-related loss of muscle mass could be counteracted by adequate metabolic interventions including nutritional intakes or exercise training. Recent observations clearly show that changes in quantitative as well as qualitative intakes of dietary protein are able to counteract some pathophysiological processes related to muscle loss progression. Other strategies including changes in daily protein pattern, the speed of protein digestion or specific amino acids supplementation may be beneficial to improve short term muscle anabolic response in elderly people. The beneficial impact of resistance or endurance training on muscle mass and function is highlighted in many studies suggesting that the potential anabolic response to exercise still remains despite a lesser metabolic response to nutrients. Thus a multimodal approach combining nutrition, exercise, hormones, specific anabolic drugs may an innovative treatment for limiting the development of sarcopenia with aging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12603-009-0203-x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boirie, Y.
Venue
The Journal of nutrition, health and aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
717-723
ISSN
1279-7707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034678952
Cited by
203
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The journal of nutrition health & aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcopenia, muscle mass loss, aging, insulin resistance, sex hormones, growth hormone, cytokines, inflammation, protein intake, amino acid supplementation, resistance training, endurance training, muscle function, dietary intervention, multimodal therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Amino Acids, Dietary Proteins, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review