Cited by 53Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSensory Analysis and Statistical Methods

The Positive Impact of Mindful Eating on Expectations of Food Liking

Hong, Phan Y., Lishner, David A., Han, Kim H., Huss, Elizabeth A.·2011·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-011-0048-3

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, P. Y., Lishner, D. A., Han, K. H., & Huss, E. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US)
  • Argosy University (US)
Corresponding author
Hong, Phan Y.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2011-02-08
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
103-113
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2071743328
Cited by
53
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Keywords
mindful eating, food liking, raisins, food neophobia, picky eating, affective evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review