Cited by 79Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

Mindfulness and Eating: An Experiment Examining the Effect of Mindful Raisin Eating on the Enjoyment of Sampled Food

Hong, Phan Y., Lishner, David A., Han, Kim H.·2014·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-012-0154-x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, P. Y., Lishner, D. A., & Han, K. H.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US)
Corresponding author
Hong, Phan Y.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2012-11-16
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
80-87
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W1993107399
Cited by
79
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
mindful eating, food enjoyment, food sampling, food neophobia, picky eating, anchovy, prunes, raisins, food experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review