Cited by 80Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsIndian and Buddhist StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Kinds and Dimensions of Mindfulness: Why it is Important to Distinguish Them

Dorjee, Dusana·2010·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-010-0016-3

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorjee, D.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dorjee, Dusana
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2010-05-29
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
152-160
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2014442465
Cited by
80
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, Buddhist meditation, attentional control, moral discernment, meta-awareness, insight, neural correlates of meditation, neuroplasticity, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review