Cited by 141Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeurology and Historical StudiesPhilosophy and History of Science

The Massive Redeployment Hypothesis and the Functional Topography of the Brain

Anderson, Michael L.·2007·Philosophical Psychology

Abstract

This essay introduces the massive redeployment hypothesis, an account of the functional organization of the brain that centrally features the fact that brain areas are typically employed to support numerous functions. The central contribution of the essay is to outline a middle course between strict localization on the one hand, and holism on the other, in such a way as to account for the supporting data on both sides of the argument. The massive redeployment hypothesis is supported by case studies of redeployment, and compared and contrasted with other theories of the localization of function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09515080701197163

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, M. L.
Affiliations
Franklin & Marshall College (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Michael L.
Venue
Philosophical Psychology
Published
2007-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
143-174
ISSN
  • 0951-5089 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-394X
OpenAlex
W2004843412
Cited by
141
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
16.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
localization of function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review