Cited by 42Embodied and Extended CognitionPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeurosciencePhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Towards Strong AI

Open access
Butz, Martin V.·2021·KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

Abstract

Strong AI—artificial intelligence that is in all respects at least as intelligent as humans—is still out of reach. Current AI lacks common sense, that is, it is not able to infer, understand, or explain the hidden processes, forces, and causes behind data. Main stream machine learning research on deep artificial neural networks (ANNs) may even be characterized as being behavioristic. In contrast, various sources of evidence from cognitive science suggest that human brains engage in the active development of compositional generative predictive models (CGPMs) from their self-generated sensorimotor experiences. Guided by evolutionarily-shaped inductive learning and information processing biases, they exhibit the tendency to organize the gathered experiences into event-predictive encodings. Meanwhile, they infer and optimize behavior and attention by means of both epistemic- and homeostasis-oriented drives. I argue that AI research should set a stronger focus on learning CGPMs of the hidden causes that lead to the registered observations. Endowed with suitable information-processing biases, AI may develop that will be able to explain the reality it is confronted with, reason about it, and find adaptive solutions, making it Strong AI. Seeing that such Strong AI can be equipped with a mental capacity and computational resources that exceed those of humans, the resulting system may have the potential to guide our knowledge, technology, and policies into sustainable directions. Clearly, though, Strong AI may also be used to manipulate us even more. Thus, it will be on us to put good, far-reaching and long-term, homeostasis-oriented purpose into these machines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13218-021-00705-x

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When discussants realise they are discussing the strictly philosophical topic of strong AI, the problem is virtually nonexistent.

    “When the discussants realise that they are discussing the strictly philosophical topic of strong AI (Butz, 2021) 2 , the problem is virtually nonexistent.”

    From There is no such thing as conscious artificial intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Butz, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y (2015) Neural machine transla- tion by jointly learning to align and translate. In: 3rd interna- tional conference on learning representations, ICLR 2015 (2015). ArXiv: 1409. 0473
  2. Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge University Press and Harvard University Press, Cambridge
  3. Pearl J (2020) The limitations of opaque learning machines. In: Brockman J (ed) Possible minds: 25 ways of looking at AI, chap. 2. Penguin Press, New York, pp 13-19
  4. Russell S (2020) The purpose put into the machine. In: Brockman J (ed) Possible minds: 25 ways of looking at AI, chap. 3. Penguin Press, New York, pp 20-32
  5. Schmidhuber J (1991) A possibility for implementing curiosity and boredom in model-building neural controllers. In: Proceed- ings of the first international conference on simulation of adap- tive behavior: from animals to animats, pp 222-227
  6. Sutton R (2019) The bitter lesson (2019). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ tops. 12502 106. · DOI
  7. Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Reinforcement learning: an intro- duction, second, edition edn. MIT Press, Cambridge 107.
  8. Tani J (2017) Exploring robotic minds. Oxford University Press, Oxford 110.
  9. Vinyals O, Babuschkin I, Chung J, Mathieu M, Jaderberg M, Czarnecki W, Dudzik A, Huang A, Georgiev P, Powell R, Ewalds T, Horgan D, Kroiss M, Danihelka I, Agapiou J, Oh J, Dalibard V, Choi D, Sifre L, Sulsky Y, Vezhnevets S, Molloy J, Cai T, Budden D, Paine T, Gulcehre C, Wang Z, Pfaff T, Pohlen T, Yogatama D, Cohen J, McKinney K, Smith O, Schaul T, Lil- licrap T, Apps C, Kavukcuoglu K, Hassabis D, Silver D (2019) Alphastar: Mastering the real-time strategy game StarCraft II. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13218-015-0361-4 114. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butz, M. V.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Butz, Martin V.
Venue
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
91-101
ISSN
  • 0933-1875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-1987
OpenAlex
W3134077149
Cited by
42
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Künstliche Intell. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (198647426, BU 1335/11-1, 390727645)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Feodor Lynen)
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
artificial general intelligence, common sense, hidden causes, causal inference, information processing biases, inductive learning, homeostasis, deep neural network, AI ethics, manipulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review