The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 76 of the 193 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Background Exercise may improve neuropsychiatric and cognitive symptoms in people with mental disorders, but the totality of the evidence is unclear. We conducted a meta-review of exercise in (1) serious mental illness (schizophrenia spectrum, bipolar disorder and major depression (MDD)); (2) anxiety and stress disorders; (3) alcohol and substance use disorders; (4) eating disorders (anorexia nervosa bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorders, and (5) other mental disorders (including ADHD, pre/post-natal depression). Methods Systematic searches of major databases from inception until 1/10/2018 were undertaken to identify meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise in people with clinically diagnosed mental disorders. In the absence of available meta-analyses for a mental disorder, we identified systematic reviews of exercise interventions in people with elevated mental health symptoms that included non-RCTs. Meta-analysis quality was assessed with the AMSTAR/+. Results Overall, we identified 27 systematic reviews (including 16 meta-analyses representing 152 RCTs). Among those with MDD, we found consistent evidence (meta-analyses = 8) that exercise reduced depression in children, adults and older adults. Evidence also indicates that exercise was more effective than control conditions in reducing anxiety symptoms (meta-analyses = 3), and as an adjunctive treatment for reducing positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (meta-analyses = 2). Regarding neurocognitive effects, exercise improved global cognition in schizophrenia (meta-analyses = 1), children with ADHD (meta-analyses = 1), but not in MDD (meta-analyses = 1). Among those with elevated symptoms, positive mental health benefits were observed for exercise in people with pre/post-natal depression, anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders/substance use disorders. Adverse events were sparsely reported. Conclusion Our panoramic meta-overview suggests that exercise can be an effective adjunctive treatment for improving symptoms across a broad range of mental disorders.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
70 No full text of the sources · 30 Partly supported · 24 No basis given · 18 Own interpretation · 12 Supported · 12 Own result · 10 Supported so far · 4 Sources not found · 4 Not checked yet · 3 Own method · 2 Mixed support · 2 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, the pooled data including older people with depressive symptoms found that aerobic exercise improved depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.90,95% CI -0.29 to -1.51, RCTs = 8, n intervention = 138, n control = 129).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.4 Older Adults
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [59] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, et al. Exercise for depression in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials adjusting for publication bias. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2016;38(3):247–54. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract Results and Results > Main analysis report the cited pooled effect and sample sizes for exercise in older adults. The Discussion distinguishes that pooled finding from aerobic exercise alone: mixed aerobic and strength training was effective, but aerobic exercise alone was not. The sentence therefore assigns the pooled result to a modality it does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Among those with MDD, we found consistent evidence (meta-analyses = 8) that exercise reduced depression in children, adults and older adults.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.3 Adults · plain
“The Cochrane review [62] (AMSTAR = 11, AMSTAR+ = 2) included 23 RCTs of people with MDD and found that exercise reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.57,95% CI -0.81 to -0.32, n = 450, I 2 = 67%).”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.3 Adults · plain
“In a trial sequential meta-analysis [63] (AMSTAR = 10, AMSTAR+ = 1), exercise was more effective than control conditions across 35 RCTs (SMD = -0.66,95% CI -0.86 to -0.46,I 2 = 81%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Cooney GM, Dwan K, Greig CA, et al. Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD004366. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] Kvam S, Kleppe CL, Nordhus IH, Hovland A. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:67–86. source
- Partly supportedcites [63] Krogh J, Hjorthoj C, Speyer H, Gluud C, Nordentoft M. Exercise for patients with major depression: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e014820. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that exercise reduced depression severity versus control in the pooled trials. But the effect disappeared when the analysis was restricted to trials less affected by bias, and the Conclusions say the authors have little confidence in the pooled estimate. The unqualified claim of a reduction therefore overstates the evidence this source provides for adults with MDD. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boosteddirectn = 450- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.3 Adults · plain
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“as an adjunctive treatment for reducing positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (metaanalyses = 2)”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · hedged
“Data from one MA [34] suggest that versus control conditions, 90 min or more of MVPA reduces total, positive and improves negative symptoms.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
- Supportedcites [69] Dauwan M, Begemann MJ, Heringa SM, Sommer IE. Exercise improves clinical symptoms, quality of life, global functioning, and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(3):588–99. source
The Primary Outcome Measure: Clinical Symptoms section reports that exercise improved negative symptoms compared with active, passive, and overall controls in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. It also reports a reduction in positive symptoms compared with controls, matching the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · hedged
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Evidence also indicates that exercise was more effective than control conditions in reducing anxiety symptoms (meta-analyses = 3)”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders · plain
“Exercise reduced anxiety symptoms at the trial end point (SMD = -0.581,95% CI -1.0 to -0.76, p = 0.02, I 2 = 66%).”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders · plain
“Aylett et al. [67] (2018, AMSTAR = 9, AMSTAR+ = 3) meta-analysed four RCTs of people with anxiety disorders in primary care and found that exercise reduced anxiety symptoms (SMD = -0.32,95% CI -0.62 to -0.01).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, et al. An examination of the anxiolytic effects of exercise for people with anxiety and stress-related disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2017;249:102–8. source
- Supportedcites [67] Aylett E, Small N, Bower P. Exercise in the treatment of clinical anxiety in general practice—a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):559. source
The Results (Analysis) report that exercise improved anxiety scores compared with waiting-list controls, with an effect size of −0.41 (95% CI −0.70 to −0.12). The Discussion (Principal findings) says the trials included people with diagnosed anxiety disorders or elevated anxiety levels and concludes that exercise was more effective than waiting-list control. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirectn = 262 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders · plain
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“exercise improved global cognition in schizophrenia (meta-analyses = 1)”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · plain
“MA of seven RCTs [33] found that exercise improved global cognition versus control conditions”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [33] Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43(3):546–56. source
The Results section (Meta-Analysis of the Neurocognitive Outcomes of Exercise) reports that exercise significantly improved global cognition compared with control groups in participants with schizophrenia (g = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.53). The Discussion explicitly describes this as a finding of the meta-analysis. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · plain
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“as an adjunctive treatment for reducing positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (metaanalyses = 2)”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · hedged
“Data from one MA [34] suggest that versus control conditions, 90 min or more of MVPA reduces total, positive and improves negative symptoms.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
- Supportedcites [69] Dauwan M, Begemann MJ, Heringa SM, Sommer IE. Exercise improves clinical symptoms, quality of life, global functioning, and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(3):588–99. source
The Primary Outcome Measure: Clinical Symptoms section reports that exercise reduced positive symptoms more than active, passive, and overall controls. The Discussion also reports significant effects on both positive and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · hedged
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“One meta-analysis [59] (AMSTAR = 10, AMSTAR+ = 1) included two RCTs of older people with MDD or dysthymia and found the effects of exercise on symptoms of depression fell short of statistical significance (SMD = -1.883,95% CI 0.44 to -4.21, p = 0.11, I 2 = 93.06%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.4 Older Adults
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [59] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, et al. Exercise for depression in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials adjusting for publication bias. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2016;38(3):247–54. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Characteristics of included trials and participants; page unavailable) identify two studies that included participants with dysthymia, but say no study was limited exclusively to participants with MDD. The available Results passages do not report the claimed two-trial estimate or p = 0.11; the significant effect reported in the Main analysis is for all eight studies, not that subgroup. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In a trial sequential meta-analysis [63] (AMSTAR = 10, AMSTAR+ = 1), exercise was more effective than control conditions across 35 RCTs (SMD = -0.66,95% CI -0.86 to -0.46,I 2 = 81%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [63] Krogh J, Hjorthoj C, Speyer H, Gluud C, Nordentoft M. Exercise for patients with major depression: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e014820. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports 35 trials and a pooled benefit for exercise versus control (SMD −0.66, 95% CI −0.86 to −0.46); the Heterogeneity and subgroup analysis reports I² = 81%. However, the subgroup analyses section says a few included trials had some participants classified as having minor depression, so the result across all 35 trials is not exclusively for adults with MDD. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Eight meta-analyses examined effects of exercise in MDD [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [57] Bailey AP, Hetrick SE, Rosenbaum S, Purcell R, Parker AG. Treating depression with physical activity in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Psychol Med. 2018;48(7):1068–83. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] Carter T, Morres ID, Meade O, Callaghan P. The effect of exercise on depressive symptoms in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(7):580–90. source
- Partly supportedcites [59] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, et al. Exercise for depression in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials adjusting for publication bias. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2016;38(3):247–54. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (Meta-analysis) confirm that this paper examined the effects of exercise on depression, so it qualifies as a meta-analysis in the cited list. But the Results (Characteristics of included trials and participants) state that none of its eight included studies was limited exclusively to participants with MDD; the analysis covered older adults with depression more broadly. The paper’s eight studies are RCTs, not eight meta-analyses. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“whilst the pharmacological [35,36] and psychotherapeutic approaches [37,38] are helpful for many, they do not result in full remission in all patients.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.1 Searches
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [35] Correll CU, Rubio JM, Kane JM. What is the risk-benefit ratio of long-term antipsychotic treatment in people with schizophrenia? World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):149–60. source
This source supports the pharmacological part of the citing sentence: its dose-reduction and discontinuation section reports symptomatic remission in 66.7% of patients continuing antipsychotic treatment, so not all achieved remission. The source concerns schizophrenia; the sentence attaches separate citations to psychotherapeutic approaches. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [36] Jorm AF, Patten SB, Brugha TS, Mojtabai R. Has increased provision of treatment reduced the prevalence of common mental disorders? Review of the evidence from four countries. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):90–9. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions say pharmacological and psychological treatments for common mental disorders work, and the United States section notes that some antidepressant users were in partial rather than full remission. The paper does not establish patient-level remission outcomes for both approaches across mental disorders; its main finding concerns population prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites [37] Cuijpers P, Cristea IA, Karyotaki E, Reijnders M, Huibers MJ. How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(3):245–58. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (pp. 245–258) concludes that CBT is probably effective for major depression and three anxiety disorders, with small-to-moderate effects against more conservative controls. That supports the claim that psychotherapy helps but has limits; the paper does not report full-remission rates for treated patients. This citation is attached to the psychotherapeutic approaches, not the pharmacological ones. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Overall, three meta-analyses investigated the benefits of exercise in anxiety and stress-related disorders [65][66][67].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, et al. An examination of the anxiolytic effects of exercise for people with anxiety and stress-related disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2017;249:102–8. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [66] Bartley CA, Hay M, Bloch MH. Meta-analysis: aerobic exercise for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;45:34–9. source
- Supportedcites [67] Aylett E, Small N, Bower P. Exercise in the treatment of clinical anxiety in general practice—a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):559. source
The Discussion (Strengths and weaknesses; page not provided) explicitly calls this study a meta-analysis of exercise for clinical anxiety and discusses its findings. The citation identifies one of the three meta-analyses in the citing sentence; this source need not establish the collective count. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Similar findings were evident for these outcomes in another meta-analysis [80] (AMSTAR = 5, AMSTAR+ = 3), but no effect was found for depressive symptoms from aerobic exercise across five RCTs.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [80] Colledge F, Gerber M, Puhse U, Ludyga S. Anaerobic exercise training in the therapy of substance use disorders: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:644. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses exercise and depression in other populations, while the synthesized findings concern substance use disorders. Searches for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and for five aerobic-exercise RCTs found no passage addressing the claimed result. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A separate systematic review, not included in the main results, reported that supervised exercise did not result in BMI or weight change in four RCTs [82], thus indicating a degree of safety.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.1 Anorexia Nervosa
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [82] Ng LW, Ng DP, Wong WP. Is supervised exercise training safe in patients with anorexia nervosa? A meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(1):1–11. source
The Results (p. 3) state that all four RCTs showed no significant change in body weight or BMI. The Abstract (p. 1) also concludes that supervised exercise appeared safe because no detrimental anthropometric effect was observed. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of seven RCTs [33] (AMSTAR = 5, AMSTAR+ = 3) of aerobic exercise and 292 people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder found that exercise improved global cognition versus control conditions which included table football alone (N = 1), occupational therapy (N = 1) and TAU (N = 5) (g = 0.412, 95% CI 0.19-0.64,p < 0.001).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [33] Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43(3):546–56. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results table and the ‘Meta-Analysis of the Neurocognitive Outcomes of Exercise’ section report that seven RCTs found improved global cognition versus controls (g = 0.412, 95% CI 0.19–0.64, P < .001). They report 297 participants, not 292. The ‘Included Studies and Participant Details’ section lists the cited control types, though it describes the included studies overall rather than assigning those counts specifically to the seven RCTs. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirectn = 292- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Data from one MA [69] of 5 RCTs found that aerobic exercise does not improve depressive symptoms”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [69] Dauwan M, Begemann MJ, Heringa SM, Sommer IE. Exercise improves clinical symptoms, quality of life, global functioning, and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(3):588–99. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the evidence for reducing depressive symptoms points more toward yoga than aerobic exercise, but it does not state that aerobic exercise has no effect on depression. The Secondary Outcome Measures report a significant reduction in depression for exercise overall, and Table 1 lists seven studies for that outcome, not five RCTs. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plainn = 200- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The results of the study were extremely mixed; however, some positive effects (not significant) were found for the outcome of abstinence in nicotine dependence.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.5 Alcohol Use Disorder/Any Substance Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [80] Colledge F, Gerber M, Puhse U, Ludyga S. Anaerobic exercise training in the therapy of substance use disorders: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:644. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Summary of Main Findings Regarding Primary Outcomes (page not provided) says six of nine nicotine-dependence studies assessing abstinence reported at least some positive effects, while cautioning that no conclusion can be drawn. The claim’s “not significant” qualifier is not supported: Table 1 marks several abstinence increases with ↑, and the paper’s table notation defines arrows as the direction of a significant effect unless otherwise stated. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A separate systematic review, not included in the main results, reported that supervised exercise did not result in BMI or weight change in four RCTs [82], thus indicating a degree of safety.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.1 Anorexia Nervosa
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [82] Ng LW, Ng DP, Wong WP. Is supervised exercise training safe in patients with anorexia nervosa? A meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(1):1–11. source
The Results (p. 3) state that all four RCTs showed no significant change in body weight or BMI. The paper concludes (p. 1) that supervised exercise appears safe in the comprehensive management of anorexia nervosa because no detrimental anthropometric effect was observed. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Whilst exercise did not reduce daily alcohol consumption or total scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, it reduced depressive symptoms when compared to controls (RCTs = 4; SMD = -0.867,p = 0.006, I 2 = 63%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.5 Alcohol Use Disorder/Any Substance Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [79] Hallgren M, Vancampfort D, Giesen ES, Lundin A, Stubbs B. Exercise as treatment for alcohol use disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(14):1058–64. source
The Other health outcomes section reports that four RCTs found reduced depressive symptoms versus controls, with SMD −0.867, p=0.006 and I²=63%. The Alcohol consumption section also reports no significant reduction in daily consumption or AUDIT total scores. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“A recent acute exercise study [84] and longer-term RCT [85] demonstrated that aerobic exercise may exert its effect by increasing brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Kallies G, Rapp MA, Fydrich T, et al. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) at rest and after acute aerobic exercise in major depressive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018;102:212–5. source
- Supportedcites [85] Kerling A, Kuck M, Tegtbur U, et al. Exercise increases serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017;215:152–5. source
The Results report a significant difference in serum BDNF change between the exercise and treatment-as-usual groups. The Discussion explicitly suggests that increased BDNF may be part of exercise’s neurobiological mechanism in patients with major depressive disorder, matching the claim’s qualified wording. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Second, there is tentative evidence that moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic and resistance training exercise improves mental health symptoms and cognition in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders [33,34,70].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [33] Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43(3):546–56. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion support cognitive benefits from exercise in people with schizophrenia, and the Introduction reports evidence of improvements in psychiatric symptoms. But the included interventions were primarily aerobic; the Discussion says resistance-training evidence for cognition came from single-arm studies, and it does not establish moderate-to-vigorous intensity as the effective level. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] Pearsall R, Smith DJ, Pelosi A, Geddes J. Exercise therapy in adults with serious mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):1–28. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Moreover, increased cardio-metabolic dysfunction has been associated with worse mental and cognitive symptoms in those with schizophrenia [98], MDD [99], bipolar disorder [100] and binge eating disorder [101].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.2 Exercise and Physical Health
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [98] Bora E, Akdede BB, Alptekin K. The relationship between cognitive impairment in schizophrenia and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(6):1030–40. source
- Partly supportedcites [99] Hryhorczuk C, Sharma S, Fulton SE. Metabolic disturbances connecting obesity and depression. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:177. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Insulin section reports that, in patients with MDD and abdominal obesity or metabolic syndrome, reduced insulin resistance correlated with reduced depressive symptoms. This supports the association with mental symptoms for the MDD portion of the sentence, which cites this paper as [99]. The passages do not establish an association with worse cognitive symptoms in people with MDD; the other diagnoses have separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [100] Volkert J, Kopf J, Kazmaier J, et al. Evidence for cognitive subgroups in bipolar disorder and the influence of subclinical depression and sleep disturbances. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25(2):192–202. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Whilst there is robust evidence in the general population for the potential of exercise for preserving and improving cognition [11,12,107], future adequately powered RCTs with the primary objective of improving cognition are needed.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [11] Prakash RS, Voss MW, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Physical activity and cognitive vitality. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66(1):769–97. source
The review states that physical activity and aerobic exercise can improve cognitive performance across the life span, with some evidence from randomized trials (Molecular and Cellular Benefits of Physical Activity; page unavailable). Its Behavioral Evidence section also reports cognitive gains and mitigation of age-related decline in older adults. The claim describes the potential of exercise rather than an established benefit for every age group, which fits the review's qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] Kramer AF, Erickson KI. Capitalizing on cortical plasticity: influence of physical activity on cognition and brain function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(8):342–8. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [107] Stubbs B, Chen LJ, Chang CY, Sun WJ, Ku PW. Accelerometer-assessed light physical activity is protective of future cognitive ability: a longitudinal study among community dwelling older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2017;91:104–9. source
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Thus, moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise alone or in combination with resistance training [44] over at least 12 weeks and achieving 90 min per week appears the optimal mode of delivery of structured exercise.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [44] Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Hallgren M, et al. EPA guidance on physical activity as a treatment for severe mental illness: a meta-review of the evidence and Position Statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the International Organization of Physical Therapists in Mental Health (IOPTMH). Eur Psychiatry. 2018;54:124–44. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.4 (page unavailable) reports benefits from aerobic exercise alone and combined aerobic and strength training in people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. It also reports optimal effects with over 90 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity per week. Although it describes a 12-week aerobic-exercise intervention, it does not establish at least 12 weeks as the optimal minimum duration. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Whilst there is some encouraging evidence of the role of resistance training alone in people with depressive symptoms [106], there are very limited data available to date on exercise as a stand-alone intervention in people with MDD.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [106] Gordon BR, McDowell CP, Hallgren M, Meyer JD, Lyons M, Herring MP. Association of efficacy of resistance exercise training with depressive symptoms: meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(6):566–76. source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that, across 33 randomized trials, resistance exercise training was associated with a significant reduction in depressive symptoms, with larger reductions in participants whose scores indicated mild to moderate depression. This supports the cited clause's cautious description of encouraging evidence; the subsequent statement about stand-alone exercise in MDD is not attributed to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.92)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Whilst the data are encouraging for core psychiatric symptoms [34,69], this finding requires replication in large, controlled trials.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
- Supportedcites [69] Dauwan M, Begemann MJ, Heringa SM, Sommer IE. Exercise improves clinical symptoms, quality of life, global functioning, and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(3):588–99. source
The Primary Outcome Measure: Clinical Symptoms section reports that exercise significantly reduced total, positive, and negative symptom severity compared with controls in people with schizophrenia. These findings support describing the data as encouraging for core psychiatric symptoms. The source does not establish the same result for serious mental illness beyond the schizophrenia spectrum. (LLM, conf=0.92)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, neurocognitive improvements following exercise in schizophrenia may again be linked to increased levels of BDNF [32].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [32] Firth J, Cotter J, Carney R, Yung AR. The pro-cognitive mechanisms of physical exercise in people with schizophrenia. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(19):3161–72. source
The Abstract says exercise-related cognitive benefits in schizophrenia may involve upregulation of BDNF, while cautioning that the evidence is insufficient for a definitive conclusion. The Discussion likewise reports associations between increased BDNF and cognitive improvement but says the mechanism remains unestablished. The citing sentence’s “may be linked” preserves that uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Future interventions should also examine the role of resistance training for improving cognition in serious mental illness, since there is a clear association between increased muscular strength and cognition in people with major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia [108, 109] and evidence from the general population indicates resistance training can improve cognition [110, 111].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Li Z, Peng X, Xiang W, Han J, Li K. The effect of resistance training on cognitive function in the older adults: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(11):1259–73. source
- Supportedcites [111] Northey JM, Cherbuin N, Pumpa KL, Smee DJ, Rattray B. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(3):154–60. source
The Conclusions report that resistance-training interventions were effective at improving cognitive function in adults older than 50. This supports the cited point that resistance training can improve cognition outside the serious-mental-illness populations discussed in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“To date, most evidence for exercise interventions in psychiatry is for depressive disorders-where there is relative harmony across the seven meta-analyses of RCTs that exercise is an effective add-on treatment to usual care to reduce symptoms of depression in adolescents [57,58], working age [60][61][62][63] and older adults [59].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [57] Bailey AP, Hetrick SE, Rosenbaum S, Purcell R, Parker AG. Treating depression with physical activity in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Psychol Med. 2018;48(7):1068–83. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] Carter T, Morres ID, Meade O, Callaghan P. The effect of exercise on depressive symptoms in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(7):580–90. source
- Not matchedcites [60][61][62][63]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [59] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, et al. Exercise for depression in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials adjusting for publication bias. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2016;38(3):247–54. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract Results and Discussion (page unavailable) report a significant reduction in depressive symptoms with exercise in older adults. Citation [59] is attached to the older-adults portion of the sentence, not the claims about adolescents or working-age adults. The Methods inclusion criteria allow usual care among several non-active comparators, so the paper does not establish the more specific claim that exercise was effective as an add-on to usual care. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Whilst not the focus of this review, along with the neuropsychiatric benefits, exercise interventions can also play an important role in reducing the physical health inequalities observed in people with mental illness [44].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.2 Exercise and Physical Health
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [44] Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Hallgren M, et al. EPA guidance on physical activity as a treatment for severe mental illness: a meta-review of the evidence and Position Statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the International Organization of Physical Therapists in Mental Health (IOPTMH). Eur Psychiatry. 2018;54:124–44. source
Section 1.1 describes the excess physical illness and premature mortality experienced by people with severe mental illness. Section 4.2 reports that exercise improved cardiorespiratory fitness versus controls, supporting the cautious claim that exercise interventions can help address this physical-health burden. The paper does not establish that the mortality gap itself was reduced. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Specifically, there is a plethora of evidence from the general population that exercise can reduce the risk of cardio-metabolic diseases (such as obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome [92,93]).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.2 Exercise and Physical Health
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [92] Naci H, Ioannidis JPA. Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2013;347:f5577. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not provided) describes population-level health benefits of exercise and discusses physical activity as a way to ward off chronic conditions including diabetes and heart disease. It does not address reduced risk of obesity or metabolic syndrome, the other examples attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [93] Naci H, Salcher-Konrad M, Dias S, et al. How does exercise treatment compare with antihypertensive medications? A network meta-analysis of 391 randomised controlled trials assessing exercise and medication effects on systolic blood pressure. Br J Sports Med. 2018;53(14):859–69. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports lower cardiovascular-disease risk with higher physical activity and says exercise improves waist circumference, HbA1c and other cardiometabolic risk factors. It does not report that exercise reduces the risk of developing obesity, diabetes or metabolic syndrome specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Future interventions should also examine the role of resistance training for improving cognition in serious mental illness, since there is a clear association between increased muscular strength and cognition in people with major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia [108, 109] and evidence from the general population indicates resistance training can improve cognition [110, 111].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [108] Firth JA, Stubbs B, et al. Association between muscular strength and cognition in people with major depression or bipolar disorder and healthy controls. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(7):740–6. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Associations Between Handgrip Strength and Cognitive Functioning section reports that greater handgrip strength was associated with better cognitive performance in people with major depression and, across several domains, bipolar disorder. The study did not examine the claimed strength–cognition association in people with schizophrenia; its Discussion mentions only a separate, mixed-diagnosis weight-training study. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites [109] Firth J, Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, et al. Grip strength is associated with cognitive performance in schizophrenia and the general population: a UK Biobank study of 476,559 participants. Schizophrenia Bull. 2018;44(4):728–36. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report an association between grip strength and cognitive performance in participants with schizophrenia. The Methods describe a general-population comparison group, but the paper does not report this association specifically for people with major depression or bipolar disorder. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, several recent studies have suggested that exercise is safe in serious mental illness [44,119].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [44] Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Hallgren M, et al. EPA guidance on physical activity as a treatment for severe mental illness: a meta-review of the evidence and Position Statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the International Organization of Physical Therapists in Mental Health (IOPTMH). Eur Psychiatry. 2018;54:124–44. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.7 reports no difference in serious or non-serious adverse events between exercise and control groups in major depression. Section 4.5 reports no adverse events for walking in one schizophrenia-spectrum study, but says information on harms is scarce; sections 4.3 and 4.9 report no adverse-event information for pooled severe mental illness and bipolar disorder. These findings offer limited support for safety, not a general conclusion that exercise is safe across serious mental illness. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [119] Czosnek L, Lederman O, Cormie P, Zopf E, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S. Health benefits, safety and cost of physical activity interventions for mental health conditions: a meta-review to inform translation efforts. Ment Health Phys Act. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2018.11.001 . source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There are recent large-scale observational [18] and Mendelian randomisation studies [124] suggesting that higher levels of PA can confer protection against mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [18] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Firth J, et al. Physical activity and incident depression: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Psychiatry. 2018:appiajp201817111194. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Discussion report a large meta-analysis of prospective observational studies associating higher physical activity with lower odds of future depression. This supports the observational-study portion of the citing sentence, but the source examines depression, not mental disorders generally. The Mendelian randomisation studies are attributed to a separate citation. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [124] Choi KW, Chen CY, Stein MB, et al. Assessment of bidirectional relationships between physical activity and depression among adults: a 2-sample Mendelian randomization study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;74(4):399–408. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports a large-scale Mendelian randomization analysis suggesting that objectively measured physical activity protects against major depressive disorder. The claim broadens that finding to mental disorders generally; the paper studied depression, and it found no significant protective relationship for self-reported activity. The separate observational-study citation is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In those with anxiety and stress disorders, there was evidence that exercise was effective versus non-active interventions in reducing anxiety symptoms [33,34,69].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.5 Exercise and Stress Disorders
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [33] Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43(3):546–56. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Meta-Analysis of the Neurocognitive Outcomes of Exercise; page unavailable) report improved cognition in people with schizophrenia, not reduced anxiety symptoms in people with anxiety or stress disorders. Searches for anxiety and stress disorders, anxiety symptoms, and non-active interventions found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
- Partly supportedcites [69] Dauwan M, Begemann MJ, Heringa SM, Sommer IE. Exercise improves clinical symptoms, quality of life, global functioning, and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(3):588–99. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Type of Exercise section says physical exercise reduces state anxiety and psychological distress in people with schizophrenia. The paper does not establish the claimed effect in people with anxiety or stress disorders, or specify a comparison with non-active interventions for the anxiety outcome. The passive-control comparisons in Primary Outcome Measure: Clinical Symptoms concern schizophrenia symptom severity, not anxiety symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For instance, for cognitive outcomes, greater effect sizes were observed by interventions which administered higher doses of exercise (minutes per week) and were delivered by a qualified exercise professional [33].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [33] Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43(3):546–56. source
The Results (‘Factors Associated With Intervention Effectiveness’) report larger cognitive improvements with more exercise minutes per week and a larger observed effect size for interventions supervised by physical activity professionals. These are descriptive findings: the dose association approached statistical significance (P = .065), and the difference between supervision subgroups was not significant (P = .19). The analysis concerned people with schizophrenia. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There is encouraging evidence for resistance training in people with elevated mental health symptoms [108-114], but this requires further testing in those with mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [108] Firth JA, Stubbs B, et al. Association between muscular strength and cognition in people with major depression or bipolar disorder and healthy controls. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(7):740–6. source
The Discussion (page not supplied) reports socio-occupational benefits of strength training in people with depression, including benefits from high-intensity weight training. That supports the cited clause’s cautious description of the evidence as encouraging; the paper does not itself test resistance training. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [109] Firth J, Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, et al. Grip strength is associated with cognitive performance in schizophrenia and the general population: a UK Biobank study of 476,559 participants. Schizophrenia Bull. 2018;44(4):728–36. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports cognitive improvements in single-arm strength-training studies of people with schizophrenia and suggests benefits from programs combining resistance and aerobic exercise. That is encouraging evidence, but it concerns schizophrenia samples and cognitive outcomes rather than people with elevated mental health symptoms broadly. The paper also notes that no RCTs had examined cognitive outcomes of strength training in schizophrenia. (LLM, conf=0.80)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Li Z, Peng X, Xiang W, Han J, Li K. The effect of resistance training on cognitive function in the older adults: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(11):1259–73. source
- Partly supportedcites [111] Northey JM, Cherbuin N, Pumpa KL, Smee DJ, Rattray B. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(3):154–60. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Review and Conclusions report encouraging evidence for resistance training to improve cognitive function in adults over 50. They do not establish that the evidence applies to people with elevated mental health symptoms; the review considers baseline cognitive status instead. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Could not verifycites [112] Gregory A, Mallikarjun P, Upthegrove R. Treatment of depression in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;211(4):198–204. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and Clinical recommendations address antidepressants for depression in schizophrenia, not resistance training. Searches for resistance training, strength training, exercise, and elevated mental health symptoms found no passage assessing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [113] Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, Schuch FB, Ward PB, Probst M, Stubbs B. Prevalence and predictors of treatment dropout from physical activity interventions in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;39:15–23. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Gordon BR, McDowell CP, Lyons M, Herring MP. The effects of resistance exercise training on anxiety: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sports Med. 2017;47(12):2521–32. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It does appear from the paucity of RCTs available that aerobic exercise does improve depressive symptoms in schizophrenia [69].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [69] Dauwan M, Begemann MJ, Heringa SM, Sommer IE. Exercise improves clinical symptoms, quality of life, global functioning, and depression in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(3):588–99. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Secondary Outcome Measures section reports that exercise overall reduced depression in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The Discussion says the evidence for reducing depressive symptoms points more toward yoga; it does not establish the claimed improvement specifically for aerobic exercise. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Given the mental health benefits, along with the clear potential for exercise to improve the poor physical health among people with schizophrenia [44], further research should now be dedicated towards establishing feasible and sustainable methods for engaging this population with moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise training in real-world settings.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [44] Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Hallgren M, et al. EPA guidance on physical activity as a treatment for severe mental illness: a meta-review of the evidence and Position Statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the International Organization of Physical Therapists in Mental Health (IOPTMH). Eur Psychiatry. 2018;54:124–44. source
Section 4.4 (Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders) reports that aerobic exercise improved cardiorespiratory fitness compared with controls and that strength training may improve muscle strength and walking performance. These findings support the claim of potential physical-health benefits, although the section also reports mixed results for weight and other cardiometabolic measures. (LLM, conf=0.91)
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“However, there is encouraging evidence of the benefits of resistance training for people with elevated symptoms of anxiety [115] and testing resistance training protocols in those with anxiety/stress disorders should be a future priority.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.5 Exercise and Stress Disorders
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [115] Lees C, Hopkins J. Effect of aerobic exercise on cognition, academic achievement, and psychosocial function in children: a systematic review of randomized control trials. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E174. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results discuss aerobic exercise in children, not resistance training in people with elevated anxiety symptoms. They report no change in anxiety levels in the aerobic-exercise study. Searches for resistance training and anxiety or stress disorders found no passage addressing the attributed claim; the aerobic result does not establish what resistance training does. (LLM, conf=0.77)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the emerging data suggest that higher intensities of aerobic exercise may produce neuropsychiatric benefits in this population [33,34,80].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [33] Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43(3):546–56. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that exercise intensity was the best predictor of cognitive improvement in a schizophrenia study, which supports the tentative claim about higher intensity. The paper did not analyze intensity across its pooled trials, and this evidence does not establish broader neuropsychiatric benefits or extend to serious mental illness generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
- Partly supportedcites [80] Colledge F, Gerber M, Puhse U, Ludyga S. Anaerobic exercise training in the therapy of substance use disorders: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:644. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Summary of Main Findings Regarding Primary Outcomes suggests that vigorous exercise may improve some outcomes in people with substance use disorders, while emphasizing that the evidence is weak. The Introduction also discusses possible psychological benefits of higher-intensity exercise. Neither passage establishes neuropsychiatric benefits of higher-intensity aerobic exercise in people with schizophrenia or serious mental illness more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“An older meta-analysis | reported that supervised | exercise does not result in | decreased BMI [82]”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [82] Ng LW, Ng DP, Wong WP. Is supervised exercise training safe in patients with anorexia nervosa? A meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(1):1–11. source
The Effects of exercise training on anthropometry section (p. 9) reports improved before-and-after BMI measurements and no further anthropometric effect when supervised exercise was added to usual management. The Discussion (p. 9) likewise reports no negative impact on weight in patients with anorexia nervosa. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, we identified 27 systematic reviews (including 16 meta-analyses representing 152 RCTs).”
- Also stated in: § 3 Results · plain
“Following the full-text screening, a total of 27 articles were included.This included 16 meta-analyses of 152 RCTs in people with clinical disorders”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
plainn = 152- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3 Results · plain
In the paper
“Data from one MA [34] suggest that versus control conditions, 90 min or more of MVPA reduces total, positive and improves negative symptoms.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Among those with MDD, we found consistent evidence (meta-analyses = 8) that exercise reduced depression in children, adults and older adults.”
- Also stated in: § Key Points · plain
“Across 27 reviews of various conditions, it was found that exercise reduces depression in children, adults and older adults”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.2 Adolescents and Youth · plain
“The results showed that aerobic and resistance exercise delivered over a median of 7 weeks (30-90 min, three times a week) had a moderately positive effect on symptoms of depression compared to control conditions including treatment as usual (TAU), stretching and instruction on health topics (SMD = -0.43,95% CI -0.84 to -0.02, p = 0.04, I 2 = 44%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] Carter T, Morres ID, Meade O, Callaghan P. The effect of exercise on depressive symptoms in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(7):580–90. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [57] Bailey AP, Hetrick SE, Rosenbaum S, Purcell R, Parker AG. Treating depression with physical activity in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Psychol Med. 2018;48(7):1068–83. source
boosteddirectn = 100 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Key Points · plain
In the paper
“children with ADHD (meta-analyses = 1)”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There was no benefit of aerobic exercise when compared to both treatment as usual or other active treatments for anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.58, p = 0.60)”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders · plain
“No difference was noted when stratified according to anxiety disorder type, when exercise was compared to pharmacotherapy (SMD = -0.28,95% CI -0.76 to 0.20, p = 0.25, RCTs = 2) or versus CBT (ES = -0.70,95% CI 0.03-1.38,RCT = 1).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [66] Bartley CA, Hay M, Bloch MH. Meta-analysis: aerobic exercise for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;45:34–9. source
plainn = 407- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders · plain
In the paper
“However, the benefits of exercise were only evident in low-quality studies (SMD = 1.176, 95% CI 0.244-2.109,p = 0.013 I 2 % = 87.64).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Richards J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;77:42–51. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The benefits of exercise were evident in trials that reported blinding of outcomes (g = -0.4,95% CI -0.7 to -0.11, RCTs = 10, n = 600) and an ITT analysis (g = -0.67,95% CI -0.9 to -0.44, RCTs = 12, n = 643).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] Kvam S, Kleppe CL, Nordhus IH, Hovland A. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:67–86. source
plaindirectn = 600- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“positive mental health benefits were observed for exercise in people with pre/post-natal depression, anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders/substance use disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The results indicated large significant benefits when exercise interventions were supervised by qualified exercise professionals (SMD = 1.537, 95% CI 0.514-2.599,p = 0.003, I 2 % = 91.61).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Richards J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;77:42–51. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Aerobic exercise resulted in similar outcomes versus other active treatments including psychological treatment (g = -0.22,95% CI -0.65 to 0.21, RCTs = 3, n = 79, I 2 = 0%) and antidepressants (g = -0.08,95% CI -0.33 to 0.18, RCTs = 3, n = 236, I 2 = 0%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] Kvam S, Kleppe CL, Nordhus IH, Hovland A. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:67–86. source
plainn = 236- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“positive mental health benefits were observed for exercise in people with pre/post-natal depression, anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders/substance use disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“positive mental health benefits were observed for exercise in people with pre/post-natal depression, anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders/substance use disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Effects were small, but still significant, after adjusting for publication bias (g = -0.38,95% CI -0.62 to -0.13; fail-safe number 463).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] Kvam S, Kleppe CL, Nordhus IH, Hovland A. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:67–86. source
plaindirectn = 977- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“but not in MDD (meta-analyses = 1)”
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · hedged
“One MA [64] including a heterogeneous cluster of interventions (including some mind-body interventions) suggests exercise cannot improve cognition or various subdomains.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Brondino N, Rocchetti M, Fusar-Poli L, et al. A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;135(4):285–95. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3.1.1 Major Depression · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among those with elevated symptoms, positive mental health benefits were observed for exercise in people with pre/post-natal depression”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adverse events were sparsely reported.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, in a subgroup analysis that excluded mind-body interventions and included only exercise RCTs (four trials), the exercise improved visual learning and memory (g = 0.241, 95% CI 0.005-0.478,I 2 = 68%,).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Brondino N, Rocchetti M, Fusar-Poli L, et al. A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;135(4):285–95. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“positive mental health benefits were observed for exercise in people with pre/post-natal depression, anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders/substance use disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One MA [68] of 5 RCTs found evidence to suggest that exercise is more effective than usual care or education in children for each of these outcomes”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Overall exercise improved multiple outcomes including attention (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.20,I 2 = 0%), hyperactivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), impulsivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-1.18,RCTs = 2, n = 64, I 2 = 0%), executive function (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI 0.15-1.00,RCTs = 3, n = 102, I 2 = 8”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.7 ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
plaindirectn = 102 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“No evidence of eating disorder distress was exacerbated by exercise [72].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.1 Anorexia Nervosa
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Overall exercise improved multiple outcomes including attention (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.20,I 2 = 0%), hyperactivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), impulsivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-1.18,RCTs = 2, n = 64, I 2 = 0%), executive function (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI 0.15-1.00,RCTs = 3, n = 102, I 2 = 8”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.7 ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“An older meta-analysis [70] (AMSTAR = 4, AMSTAR+ = 2) of people with serious mental illness (schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorder) suggested that exercise did not improve anxiety and depression scores combined (SMD = -0.26,95% CI -0.91 to 0.39, RCT = 3, n = 94, I 2 = 49%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] Pearsall R, Smith DJ, Pelosi A, Geddes J. Exercise therapy in adults with serious mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):1–28. source
hedgedn = 94- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Overall exercise improved multiple outcomes including attention (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.20,I 2 = 0%), hyperactivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), impulsivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-1.18,RCTs = 2, n = 64, I 2 = 0%), executive function (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI 0.15-1.00,RCTs = 3, n = 102, I 2 = 8”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.7 ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
plaindirectn = 64 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“although compared to wait list or placebo aerobic exercise was effective (SMD = 1.42, 95% CI 0.80-2.04,p = 0.001, RCTs = 2).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [66] Bartley CA, Hay M, Bloch MH. Meta-analysis: aerobic exercise for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;45:34–9. source
plaindirectn = 407 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Exercise interventions varied but only interventions delivered at over 90 min of MVPA per week improved total symptoms (SMD = -0.72,95% CI -1.14 to -0.29), positive symptoms (SMD -0.54, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.13) and negative symptoms (SMD = -0.44,95% CI -0.78 to -0.09).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One MA [70] including three RCTs suggests that exercise is no different to usual care for anxiety and depressive symptoms”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] Pearsall R, Smith DJ, Pelosi A, Geddes J. Exercise therapy in adults with serious mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):1–28. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Exercise interventions varied but only interventions delivered at over 90 min of MVPA per week improved total symptoms (SMD = -0.72,95% CI -1.14 to -0.29), positive symptoms (SMD -0.54, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.13) and negative symptoms (SMD = -0.44,95% CI -0.78 to -0.09).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Exercise interventions varied but only interventions delivered at over 90 min of MVPA per week improved total symptoms (SMD = -0.72,95% CI -1.14 to -0.29), positive symptoms (SMD -0.54, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.13) and negative symptoms (SMD = -0.44,95% CI -0.78 to -0.09).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Overall exercise improved multiple outcomes including attention (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.20,I 2 = 0%), hyperactivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), impulsivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-1.18,RCTs = 2, n = 64, I 2 = 0%), executive function (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI 0.15-1.00,RCTs = 3, n = 102, I 2 = 8”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.7 ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
plaindirectn = 62 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors reported two studies which found that exercise reduced eating disorder symptoms (e.g. less food preoccupation) following exercise participation.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.1 Anorexia Nervosa
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
plaindirectn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One MA [68] of 5 RCTs found evidence to suggest that exercise is more effective than usual care or education in children for each of these outcomes”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One MA [68] of 5 RCTs found evidence to suggest that exercise is more effective than usual care or education in children for each of these outcomes”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One MA [68] of 5 RCTs found evidence to suggest that exercise is more effective than usual care or education in children for each of these outcomes”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Six studies found psychological wellbeing improved following participation in exercise.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.1 Anorexia Nervosa
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We did not find any meta-analyses that focussed on exercise RCTs with clinically diagnosed bipolar disorder, eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, pre/post-natal depression, alcohol use disorders or substance use disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Without Meta-analyses of RCTs in Clinically Diagnosed Samples
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Overall exercise improved multiple outcomes including attention (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.20,I 2 = 0%), hyperactivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), impulsivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-1.18,RCTs = 2, n = 64, I 2 = 0%), executive function (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI 0.15-1.00,RCTs = 3, n = 102, I 2 = 8”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.7 ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
plaindirectn = 62 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One MA [68] of 5 RCTs found evidence to suggest that exercise is more effective than usual care or education in children for each of these outcomes”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One MA [68] of 5 RCTs found evidence to suggest that exercise is more effective than usual care or education in children for each of these outcomes”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Exercise was found to be associated with less depressive symptoms and there was a lack of clarity with mania symptoms.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.1 Bipolar Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] Melo MC, Daher Ede F, Albuquerque SG, de Bruin VM. Exercise in bipolar patients: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:32–8. source
plaincorrelationaln = 15,587- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Exercise was found to be associated with less depressive symptoms and there was a lack of clarity with mania symptoms.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.1 Bipolar Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] Melo MC, Daher Ede F, Albuquerque SG, de Bruin VM. Exercise in bipolar patients: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:32–8. source
plainn = 15,587- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“First, we found relatively consistent evidence across eight meta-analyses [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] that structured moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise can have a positive impact on symptoms of depression as an add-on treatment in adolescents, working age and older adults.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Compared to control conditions, exercise was effective in reducing depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.64,95% CI -0.96 to -0.33, p < 0.001).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.4 Pre/Post-natal Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [76] Carter T, Bastounis A, Guo B, Jane Morrell C. The effectiveness of exercise-based interventions for preventing or treating postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018;22:37–53. source
plaindirectn = 1,428- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Evidence from RCTs found that exercise interventions, compared to no exercise, decreased the severity of prenatal depressive symptoms (13 RCTs, n = 1076; SMD = -0.38,95% CI -0.51 to -0.25,I 2 = 10%), and reduced the odds of prenatal depression by 67% (5 RCTs, n = 683; OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.53,I 2 = 0%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.4 Pre/Post-natal Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Davenport MH, McCurdy AP, Mottola MF, et al. Impact of prenatal exercise on both prenatal and postnatal anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(21):1376–85. source
plaindirectn = 683- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among the RCTs, it was found that the number of BE episodes was significantly reduced with exercise compared to other interventions, and a significant decrease in depressive symptoms was also found when accompanied by the treatment of binge eating disorder.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.2 Binge Eating Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Blanchet C, Mathieu ME, St-Laurent A, Fecteau S, St-Amour N, Drapeau V. A systematic review of physical activity interventions in individuals with binge eating disorders. Curr Obes Rep. 2018;7(1):76–88. source
plaindirectn = 842- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the increasing evidence base for the positive effects of exercise on mental health symptoms in people with mental disorders, relatively little has been established in humans about the underlying mechanisms.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There is some tentative evidence that supervised exercise may be helpful for people with AN [72] without negatively impacting BMI [82] and may help improve ED symptoms in bulimia nervosa [72] whilst also potentially reducing binge eating disorder symptomology and depressive symptoms and improving psychological wellbeing in binge eating disorders [71].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The review [83] also found that longer-term exercise may exert its antidepressant effect by promoting long-term adaptations of copeptin, thiobarbituric acid reactive species and total mean frequency.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [83] Schuch FB, Deslandes AC, Stubbs B, Gosmann NP, Silva CT, Fleck MP. Neurobiological effects of exercise on major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;61:1–11. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Preliminary evidence also suggests that compared to controls, interventions with exercise are significantly more effective at decreasing depressive symptoms in people experiencing PTSD.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.3 Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [75] Rosenbaum S, Vancampfort D, Steel Z, Newby J, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Physical activity in the treatment of Post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):130–6. source
hedgeddirectn = 200- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although two of the included studies investigated the impact of yoga, data from two of the pooled trials utilising combined aerobic and resistance, and aerobiconly exercises, provided promising evidence that exercise can significantly reduce PTSD symptoms, compared to control conditions.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.3 Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [75] Rosenbaum S, Vancampfort D, Steel Z, Newby J, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Physical activity in the treatment of Post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):130–6. source
plaindirectn = 200- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among the RCTs, it was found that the number of BE episodes was significantly reduced with exercise compared to other interventions, and a significant decrease in depressive symptoms was also found when accompanied by the treatment of binge eating disorder.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.2 Binge Eating Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Blanchet C, Mathieu ME, St-Laurent A, Fecteau S, St-Amour N, Drapeau V. A systematic review of physical activity interventions in individuals with binge eating disorders. Curr Obes Rep. 2018;7(1):76–88. source
plaindirectn = 842- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, a preliminary meta-analysis [86] of only 6 RCTs and 176 participants found that longer-term changes in BDNF fell short of significance (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI -0.06-0.92,p = 0.09).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [86] Dinoff A, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Gallagher D, Lanctot KL. The effect of exercise on resting concentrations of peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;105:123–31. source
plainn = 176- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Third, the data indicate that moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise can have a positive impact on multiple outcomes in children with ADHD [68].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In 64 women (age range = 18-29 years, BMI = 20.3kg/m 2 ), exercisers reported 18 months post-intervention significantly less binges and vomiting compared to control interventions that included cognitive behavioural therapy and nutritional counselling.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.2.3 Bulimia Nervosa
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Vancampfort D, Vanderlinden J, De Hert M, et al. A systematic review of physical therapy interventions for patients with anorexia and bulemia nervosa. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(8):628–34. source
plaindirectn = 64- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This lack of clarity is perhaps exemplified by the most densely researched area of exercise and MDD where a recent systematic review [83] found tentative evidence that acute (i.e. a single bout) exercise may exert its antidepressant effect by increasing atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide, copeptin and growth hormone among people with MDD.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [83] Schuch FB, Deslandes AC, Stubbs B, Gosmann NP, Silva CT, Fleck MP. Neurobiological effects of exercise on major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;61:1–11. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Evidence from RCTs found that exercise interventions, compared to no exercise, decreased the severity of prenatal depressive symptoms (13 RCTs, n = 1076; SMD = -0.38,95% CI -0.51 to -0.25,I 2 = 10%), and reduced the odds of prenatal depression by 67% (5 RCTs, n = 683; OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.53,I 2 = 0%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.4 Pre/Post-natal Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Davenport MH, McCurdy AP, Mottola MF, et al. Impact of prenatal exercise on both prenatal and postnatal anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(21):1376–85. source
plaindirectn = 1,076- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This Cochrane review [64] was heavily criticised for multiple methodological and selection biases [102].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [102] Ekkekakis P. Honey, I shrunk the pooled SMD! Guide to critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the Cochrane review on exercise for depression as example. Ment Health Phys Act. 2015;8:21–36. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This is particularly relevant to psychiatric populations, as people with mental illness are significantly less active and more sedentary than the general population [94], and this has been identified as a transdiagnostic risk factor for the elevated cardio-metabolic risk [95][96][97].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.2 Exercise and Physical Health
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [95][96][97]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Among people with MDD, one meta-analysis [64] found that aerobic exercise had no main effects on cognitive functioning.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Brondino N, Rocchetti M, Fusar-Poli L, et al. A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;135(4):285–95. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Kvam et al. [61] and another meta-analysis [103] published after our search date found that aerobic exercise was more effective than control conditions for depressive symptoms in MDD in RCTs at low risk of bias.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] Kvam S, Kleppe CL, Nordhus IH, Hovland A. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:67–86. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [103] Morres ID, Hatzigeorgiadis A, Stathi A, et al. Aerobic exercise for adult patients with major depressive disorder in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36(1):39–53. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Whilst there is some encouraging evidence of the role of resistance training alone in people with depressive symptoms [106], there are very limited data available to date on exercise as a stand-alone intervention in people with MDD.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For optimal outcomes in MDD, it appears that supervised exercise interventions tailored to the individual have larger effect sizes [60].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Richards J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;77:42–51. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A major criticism of the potential benefits of exercise for MDD is the relatively short follow-up of most studies (< 6 months).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“There is also some tentative evidence from comparative meta-analyses that exercise has similar effects to psychotherapy [61] and antidepressant medications [61,62].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] Kvam S, Kleppe CL, Nordhus IH, Hovland A. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:67–86. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Cooney GM, Dwan K, Greig CA, et al. Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD004366. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“With the exception of the pre-and post-natal depression reviews [76][77][78], the sample sizes were relatively small in these areas and future adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm/refute the encouraging work in these areas.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.7 Exercise and Mental Health Symptoms
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [76][77][78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disappointingly, there is a dearth of evidence from RCTs that can elucidate the potential benefits of exercise for mental health or cognitive symptoms in people with bipolar disorder.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.7 Exercise and Mental Health Symptoms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Despite the small number of participants and RCTs, there is also encouraging evidence that aerobic exercise can improve multiple cognitive domains in children with ADHD [68].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.6 Exercise and ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beyond treatment, there are encouraging data considering the potential for exercise to act as a primary prevention for mental disorders that should be tested further.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, there is a relative paucity of data on the impact of exercise in adolescents and youth with mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given the unanimous low levels of moderatevigorous PA in mental disorders ( [94,[120][121][122], with the exception of AN [123]), achieving such targets is aspirational.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [94,[120][121][122]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [123] Gummer R, Giel KE, Schag K, et al. High levels of physical activity in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015;23(5):333–44. source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This rendered it impossible to make meaningful direct statistical comparisons between different modes of exercise (e.g.resistance versus aerobic exercise) within and across mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Systematic review of 8 studies | [73] suggests number of | binge eating episodes, depres- | sive symptoms significantly | reduced with exercise”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Blanchet C, Mathieu ME, St-Laurent A, Fecteau S, St-Amour N, Drapeau V. A systematic review of physical activity interventions in individuals with binge eating disorders. Curr Obes Rep. 2018;7(1):76–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“evidence from all | studies showed eating disor- | der distress was not worsened | by exercise”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Data from one systematic | review [74] with one RCT | found that aerobic exercise | resulted in less binges and | vomiting compared to control | interventions that included | cognitive behavioural therapy | and nutritional counselling”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Vancampfort D, Vanderlinden J, De Hert M, et al. A systematic review of physical therapy interventions for patients with anorexia and bulemia nervosa. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(8):628–34. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Data from one systematic | review [74] with one RCT | found that aerobic exercise | resulted in less binges and | vomiting compared to control | interventions that included | cognitive behavioural therapy | and nutritional counselling”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Vancampfort D, Vanderlinden J, De Hert M, et al. A systematic review of physical therapy interventions for patients with anorexia and bulemia nervosa. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(8):628–34. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Evidence from 2 studies in a | systematic review of 10 stud- | ies [72] suggests that exercise | may help eating disorder | symptoms”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Evidence from one systematic | review [71] of 31 studies | suggests that exercise is asso- | ciated with less depressive | symptoms”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] Melo MC, Daher Ede F, Albuquerque SG, de Bruin VM. Exercise in bipolar patients: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:32–8. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“small sample size”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“lack of | blinding in studies”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“most studies to | date are observational studies”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Systematic review of 8 studies | [73] suggests number of | binge eating episodes, depres- | sive symptoms significantly | reduced with exercise”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Blanchet C, Mathieu ME, St-Laurent A, Fecteau S, St-Amour N, Drapeau V. A systematic review of physical activity interventions in individuals with binge eating disorders. Curr Obes Rep. 2018;7(1):76–88. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our panoramic meta-overview suggests that exercise can be an effective adjunctive treatment for improving symptoms across a broad range of mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, our data provide robust evidence for the value of moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise as a potential transdiagnostic intervention for mental health symptoms across people with mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clearly, whilst there is a consensus of the benefit of exercise for depression, there is a need for larger and better controlled RCTs to be developed in MDD to attempt to match the standards in other areas of psychiatry such as psychological therapy.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given these findings, the potential for exercise to act as a transdiagnostic treatment is considerable.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Given the burden of attention, behavioural and cognitive deficits often noted in children with ADHD and concerns about over prescription of medications with side effects [116], exercise could hold promise as an adjunctive treatment and requires testing in robust well-powered RCTs.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.6 Exercise and ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [116] Wilens TE, Adler LA, Adams J, et al. Misuse and diversion of stimulants prescribed for ADHD: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47(1):21–31. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Supervised exercise can be safe | for individuals with anorexia | nervosa”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Supervised exercise can be safe | for individuals with anorexia | nervosa and may improve | symptoms of eating disorders | and psychological wellbeing”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is limited and moderate- | quality evidence to suggest | that exercise can have a posi- | tive effect on aspects of binge | eating disorder”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“may improve | symptoms of eating disorders”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These tentative data suggest | that adjunctive aerobic exer- | cise may be helpful in reduc- | ing some core symptoms of | bulimia nervosa”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“conclusions cannot yet be | made regarding which exact | interventions may yield the | best results for this population”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 41
- The quote only partly states this claim. 8
- Probably not a substantial claim. 13
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Evidence from 2 reviews [80, 81], including 48 studies found that exercise effectively increased abstinence rates, particularly for nicotine”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.5 Alcohol Use Disorder/Any Substance Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [81] Wang D, Wang Y, Li R, Zhou C. Impact of physical exercise on substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110728. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Effect of physical exercise on abstinence rate) support the pooled increase in abstinence (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.44–1.99). But the same section says the effect was greater for illicit-drug users than for alcohol or nicotine users—the opposite of “particularly for nicotine.” This meta-analysis included 22 studies; the citing sentence attributes 48 to two reviews collectively. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Partly supportedcites [80] Colledge F, Gerber M, Puhse U, Ludyga S. Anaerobic exercise training in the therapy of substance use disorders: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:644. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Summary of Main Findings Regarding Primary Outcomes (page not provided) says six of nine nicotine studies reported at least some positive effect on abstinence, but explicitly says no conclusion about effectiveness can be drawn. It does not report the claimed pooled OR or establish increased abstinence across nicotine, alcohol, and illicit drug users. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Disputed
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, psychosocial mechanisms also play a pivotal role in the mental health benefits of exercise, such as increased social support and reduced social isolation [88], improved self-esteem [89] and body image [90].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [88] Gross J, Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Gorczynski P, Soundy A. A narrative synthesis investigating the use and value of social support to promote physical activity among individuals with schizophrenia. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(2):123–50. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Stage four discussion (page unavailable) says friendships develop during physical activity among people with schizophrenia and associates those friendships with reduced psychiatric symptoms. It does not report a measured reduction in social isolation. The paper also cautions that the effect of social support on health outcomes is difficult to establish, so the claim that these mechanisms play a pivotal role in exercise’s mental-health benefits is stronger and broader than its findings. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Disputedcites [89] Liu M, Wu L, Ming Q. How does physical activity intervention improve self-esteem and self-concept in children and adolescents? Evidence from a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134804. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Citation [89] is attached specifically to “improved self-esteem,” not to the separate claims about social support or body image. In Results, under “Meta-analysis of studies with intervention of PA alone” (page not provided), the paper reports improvements in self-concept and self-worth but no significant pooled effect on self-esteem. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] Bassett-Gunter R, McEwan D, Kamarhie A. Physical activity and body image among men and boys: a meta-analysis. Body Image. 2017;22:114–28. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“two independent authors assessed the quality of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the AMSTAR and AMSTAR+ tool [53][54][55].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.6 Risk of Bias (Quality) Assessment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [53] Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–20. source
The Methods section says two reviewers applied AMSTAR to systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. The Discussion identifies AMSTAR as an instrument for assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews. This citation supports identification of the AMSTAR tool; it does not establish what the citing authors did or identify AMSTAR+. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [54] Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10–7. source
The Background and Methods (Objective 2; pages not provided) describe the development of AMSTAR as a tool for assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews. In this sentence, the citation identifies the AMSTAR tool; the statement that two authors used it describes the citing authors’ own procedure, while the other citations may address AMSTAR+. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Sharif MO, Janjua-Sharif FN, Ali H, Ahmed F. Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR—how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013;12(1):9–16.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“there is increasing recognition that exercise may have important effects on psychiatric symptoms [32][33][34] and neurocognitive functioning [32], across many conditions, thus potentially acting as a transdiagnostic treatment for mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.1 Searches
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [32] Firth J, Cotter J, Carney R, Yung AR. The pro-cognitive mechanisms of physical exercise in people with schizophrenia. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(19):3161–72. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not available) reports cognitive benefits of exercise in schizophrenia and cites benefits in older adults, healthy adults and people with dementia. The paper therefore supports the neurocognitive part of the citation, but its review focuses on schizophrenia and does not establish exercise as a treatment for psychiatric symptoms across many mental disorders. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [33] Firth J, Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, et al. Aerobic exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;43(3):546–56. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports cognitive benefits of exercise in people with schizophrenia and notes prior evidence of improved psychiatric symptoms in that population. The Methods’ Eligibility Criteria (page unavailable) limit this review to schizophrenia and related nonaffective psychosis; it does not establish effects across many conditions. The transdiagnostic-treatment proposal is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding of this review. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Three RCTs reported adverse events and no difference in the exercise or control interventions.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [63] Krogh J, Hjorthoj C, Speyer H, Gluud C, Nordentoft M. Exercise for patients with major depression: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e014820. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The serious-adverse-events results report that three trials recorded death or suicide attempts, and the strengths and limitations section reports no statistically significant effect of exercise on those outcomes. The claim omits that these were *serious* adverse events: the non-serious-adverse-events section says ten trials reported those events. The review also cautions that the sparse data do not establish whether exercise changes adverse-event risk. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we used the AMSTAR+ which has six additional items on the content validity of included meta-analyses with scores ranging from 0 to 8 (> 4 indicating high quality).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.6 Risk of Bias (Quality) Assessment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [25] Vancampfort D, Firth J, Correll CU, et al. The impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve physical health outcomes in people with schizophrenia: a meta-review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):53–66. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The quality-assessment passage describes six additional AMSTARPlus Content items for assessing the content validity of included meta-analyses, with a score range of 0–8. It defines high quality as a score of 4 or higher, not greater than 4 as the citing sentence states. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [56] Correll CU, Rubio JM, Inczedy-Farkas G, Birnbaum ML, Kane JM, Leucht S. Efficacy of 42 Pharmacologic cotreatment strategies added to antipsychotic monotherapy in schizophrenia: systematic overview and quality appraisal of the aeta-analytic evidence. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(7):675–84. source
The Methods describe six additional AMSTAR-Plus Content items assessing content quality, with a score ranging from 0 to 8. The Results say only one strategy scored above 4, and the Discussion identifies that strategy as the exception to generally low content quality, supporting the stated cutoff. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Furthermore, even in those who respond well to traditional treatments, some continue to experience residual symptoms, and/or a risk of future relapse [35,36,38].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.1 Searches
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [35] Correll CU, Rubio JM, Kane JM. What is the risk-benefit ratio of long-term antipsychotic treatment in people with schizophrenia? World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):149–60. source
The Conclusions and Recommendations section acknowledges residual symptoms despite treatment and recommends discussing the probability of relapse whether antipsychotics are stopped or continued. The Individual Differences section also says only a minority of patients stabilized after an acute episode may discontinue treatment without relapse. These passages support the claim for patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics; page numbers were not provided for the passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [36] Jorm AF, Patten SB, Brugha TS, Mojtabai R. Has increased provision of treatment reduced the prevalence of common mental disorders? Review of the evidence from four countries. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):90–9. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The United States section (page not specified in our copy) says that some people using treatment are in remission or partial remission and that continued treatment may be justified to prevent relapse. It does not establish that these are patients who responded well to traditional treatments, so that qualifier is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites [38] Bighelli I, Salanti G, Huhn M, et al. Psychological interventions to reduce positive symptoms in schizophrenia: systematic review and network meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(3):316–29. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) says trial participants generally continued antipsychotic medication while receiving interventions for positive symptoms, supporting the point that symptoms can persist during traditional treatment. It does not establish that these patients had responded well to that treatment. The Secondary outcomes section (page unavailable) says very few relapse data were available, so it does not substantiate the relapse-risk part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.80)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Whilst exercise did not reduce daily alcohol consumption or total scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, it reduced depressive symptoms when compared to controls (RCTs = 4; SMD = -0.867,p = 0.006, I 2 = 63%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.5 Alcohol Use Disorder/Any Substance Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [79] Hallgren M, Vancampfort D, Giesen ES, Lundin A, Stubbs B. Exercise as treatment for alcohol use disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(14):1058–64. source
The Meta-analysis of exercise versus control conditions (Alcohol consumption) reports no evidence that exercise reduced average daily alcohol consumption or AUDIT total scores. The paper’s Results section also uses the same wording as the claim. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plainn = 1,204- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Among people with schizophrenia, the potential positive effects on mental health and cognitive symptoms have been suggested to be related to increases in hippocampal volume [87], yet these findings in mental disorders have not been replicated in a recent meta-analysis of RCTs [8].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [87] Pajonk FG, Wobrock T, Gruber O, et al. Hippocampal plasticity in response to exercise in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(2):133–43. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Partly supportedcites [8] Firth J, Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, et al. Effect of aerobic exercise on hippocampal volume in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2018;166:230–8. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“There is some tentative evidence that supervised exercise may be helpful for people with AN [72] without negatively impacting BMI [82] and may help improve ED symptoms in bulimia nervosa [72] whilst also potentially reducing binge eating disorder symptomology and depressive symptoms and improving psychological wellbeing in binge eating disorders [71].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
- Supportedcites [82] Ng LW, Ng DP, Wong WP. Is supervised exercise training safe in patients with anorexia nervosa? A meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(1):1–11. source
The Discussion (p. 9) says supervised exercise in the management of anorexia nervosa may have psychological and physiological benefits without a negative impact on weight. The Abstract (p. 1) reports improved strength and cardiovascular fitness with no detrimental effect on anthropometric measures. The claim's tentative wording is consistent with the study limitations noted on p. 10. (LLM, conf=0.91)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Available evidence indicates that moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise may improve SUD abstinence rates and anxiety/ depressive symptoms across multiple SUDs [80,81].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [80] Colledge F, Gerber M, Puhse U, Ludyga S. Anaerobic exercise training in the therapy of substance use disorders: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:644. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Summary of Main Findings Regarding Primary Outcomes (page not provided) says vigorous exercise may benefit some outcomes, and the review reports positive abstinence findings for nicotine dependence and some reductions in anxiety and depression for drug dependence. But results across substance use disorders were mixed, and the Conclusions say exercise intensities were usually not measured well enough to determine their effects. The source therefore does not establish the claimed benefit specifically for moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise across multiple disorders. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Supportedcites [81] Wang D, Wang Y, Li R, Zhou C. Impact of physical exercise on substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110728. source
The Abstract Results report increased abstinence rates and reduced anxiety and depression symptoms in a meta-analysis of exercise interventions. The Abstract Conclusions identify moderate- and high-intensity aerobic exercise as effective for people with substance use disorders, and the Conclusions specify alcohol, nicotine, and illicit drugs. Depression findings varied by disorder, consistent with the citing sentence’s cautious wording. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This is particularly relevant to psychiatric populations, as people with mental illness are significantly less active and more sedentary than the general population [94], and this has been identified as a transdiagnostic risk factor for the elevated cardio-metabolic risk [95][96][97].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.2 Exercise and Physical Health
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [94] Vancampfort D, Firth J, Schuch FB, et al. Sedentary behavior and physical activity levels in people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):308–15. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper reports significantly more sedentary behavior and less moderate and vigorous physical activity than matched healthy controls (Daily amount of sedentary behavior; Daily amount of moderate or vigorous physical activity). Its findings concern people with severe mental illness—schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder—not people with mental illness generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Whilst the diagnoses of depression were identified through the Patient Health Questionnaire [104], a recent large-scale (n = 945) study [105] has partly addressed this concern, finding that aerobic exercise was equally as effective as internet delivered CBT and better than usual care after 12 months.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [105] Hallgren M, Helgadottir B, Herring MP, et al. Exercise and internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: multicentre randomised controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(5):414–20. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report 945 patients, and Depression severity reports that exercise produced greater reductions than usual care at 12 months. However, the Exercise section includes yoga and stretching as well as aerobics, so the finding cannot be attributed specifically to aerobic exercise. The paper also does not establish that exercise and internet-delivered CBT were equally effective; its Discussion says both were at least as effective as usual care. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirectn = 945- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Similar positive effects of the benefits of aerobic exercise on cognition, mental health and academic achievement have been observed in children in the general population [5,6,115].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.6 Exercise and ADHD
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [5] Lubans D, Richards J, Hillman C, et al. Physical activity for cognitive and mental health in youth: a systematic review of mechanisms. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3):e20161642. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusion (p. 21) says physical activity interventions can improve cognitive and mental health in young people, supporting those parts of the claim. It does not establish the same combined finding specifically for aerobic exercise in children in the general population, or report improved academic achievement; the achievement study listed in the References (p. 23) concerns overweight children. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] Lubans D, Plotnikoff R, Lubans N. A systematic review of the impact of physical activity programmes on social and emotional well-being in at-risk youth. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2011;17(1):2–13. source
- Supportedcites [115] Lees C, Hopkins J. Effect of aerobic exercise on cognition, academic achievement, and psychosocial function in children: a systematic review of randomized control trials. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E174. source
The Results report improved cognitive and academic performance in several trials and less depression and greater self-esteem in a trial measuring mental health. The Discussion says the review excluded studies of specific populations to improve population-level generalizability. It also cautions that only one study examined mental-health outcomes and that some improvements were small or nonsignificant (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Depression is highly comorbid in schizophrenia and treatment options are limited [112]; thus, future well-powered RCTs are required that specifically include people with schizophrenia and depression to elucidate if exercise can improve depressive symptoms.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [112] Gregory A, Mallikarjun P, Upthegrove R. Treatment of depression in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;211(4):198–204. source
The introductory passage reports that depression affects over 50% of people with schizophrenia and that specific treatment guidance is lacking. The Conclusions add that evidence for antidepressant treatment is mixed and based on a small number of studies, supporting the claim that treatment options are limited. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This included 16 meta-analyses of 152 RCTs in people with clinical disorders [33,34,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] and 11 further systematic reviews in people with elevated symptoms and areas not covered by the existing meta-analyses [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3 Results
plainn = 152- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean AMSTAR and AMSTAR+ scores were 9.71 (range 7-11), 1.71 (range 1-4), respectively.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The initial searches identified 4089 de-duplicated hits, of which 269 full text screens were reviewed.Following the full-text screening, a total of 27 articles were included.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3 Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, across six RCTs with 461 participants that had blinded group allocation, blinded outcome assessments, and ITT analysis, a small, heterogeneous but non-significant effect was evident (g = -0.26,95% CI -0.61 to 0.08, p = 0.14, I 2 = 68%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] Kvam S, Kleppe CL, Nordhus IH, Hovland A. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;202:67–86. source
plainn = 461- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall exercise improved multiple outcomes including attention (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.20,I 2 = 0%), hyperactivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), impulsivity (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.04-1.08,RCTs = 2, n = 62, I 2 = 0%), anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-1.18,RCTs = 2, n = 64, I 2 = 0%), executive function (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI 0.15-1.00,RCTs = 3, n = 102, I 2 = 8”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.7 ADHD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Cerrillo-Urbina AJ, Garcia-Hermoso A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Santos Gomez JL, Martinez-Vizcaino V. The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):779–88. source
plaindirectn = 53 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the mean AMSTAR and AMSTAR+ scores were 6.66 (range 5-9) and 3 (range 1-3), respectively.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Across several subgroup analyses exercise did not improve speed of processing; attention/ vigilance; working memory; verbal learning and memory and reasoning and problem solving.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Brondino N, Rocchetti M, Fusar-Poli L, et al. A systematic review of cognitive effects of exercise in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;135(4):285–95. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There is some tentative evidence that supervised exercise may be helpful for people with AN [72] without negatively impacting BMI [82] and may help improve ED symptoms in bulimia nervosa [72] whilst also potentially reducing binge eating disorder symptomology and depressive symptoms and improving psychological wellbeing in binge eating disorders [71].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] Melo MC, Daher Ede F, Albuquerque SG, de Bruin VM. Exercise in bipolar patients: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:32–8. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, limited data from interventions are available to support the use of moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise in bipolar disorder, although observational data imply that exercise can have a positive impact on depressive symptomology.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There is also good evidence that moderateto-vigorous intensity exercise in the pre-and postpartum period can reduce depressive symptoms and the odds of developing depression [76][77][78].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [76][77][78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Fourth, in people with PTSD (as indicated by validated measures, but without confirmed diagnoses), preliminary evidence suggests that moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise can reduce symptoms of both PTSD and depression [75].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4 Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [75] Rosenbaum S, Vancampfort D, Steel Z, Newby J, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Physical activity in the treatment of Post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):130–6. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Among people with anxiety and stress disorders, a number of theories with modest amounts of data have suggested that increasing self-esteem, adaptations in GABA levels, adaptations in norepinephrine and the serotonin neurotransmitter system may account for the anxiolytic effects [91].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.1 Potential Mechanisms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Herring M. Exercise for the management of anxiety and stress-related disorders. In: Stubbs B, Rosenbaum S, editors. Exercise based interventions for mental illness: physical activity as part of clinical treatment. London: Elsevier; 2018.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For instance, Schuch et al. [60] found that exercise was effective in high-quality RCTs when considering those with MDD and subthreshold depressive symptoms but not in MDD only (although limited to 2 RCTs).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Richards J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;77:42–51. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, there is a paucity of data on potential adverse events and cost-effectiveness data from exercise interventions.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, for many of the mental disorder categories, the number of RCTs and included participants was small and included samples that are unrepresentative of the realities of clinical practice.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fifth, owing to the complex nature of the field, there was variation in the calculation and reporting of effect sizes, publication bias, heterogeneity and general reporting.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this has yet to be tested in experimental studies, and so the key question remains as to whether increasing an individual's PA behaviour can actually prevent the onset of psychiatric conditions.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, there was considerable heterogeneity in the exercise interventions across the included systematic reviews and specific details regarding the frequency, intensity, type and time of exercise were often lacking.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In schizophrenia/serious mental illness, adverse event reporting at a meta-analytical level is sparse, whilst dropout from exercise interventions appears higher than in control groups [113].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [113] Vancampfort D, Rosenbaum S, Schuch FB, Ward PB, Probst M, Stubbs B. Prevalence and predictors of treatment dropout from physical activity interventions in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;39:15–23. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RCTs in anxiety and stress disorders to date have included relatively few people and there are a small number of RCTs, clearly emphasising a need for larger-scaled RCTs.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.5 Exercise and Stress Disorders
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, significant effects on positive and negative symptoms were only observed in RCTs which administered at least 90 min per week of moderateto-vigorous intensity exercise (with no symptomatic benefits observed from low-intensity training) [34].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Firth J, Cotter J, Elliott R, French P, Yung AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions in schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2015;45(7):1343–61. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Among people with mental disorders identified through clinically validated measures (but in absence of confirmed diagnoses), there is encouraging evidence for improved mental health outcomes in those with PTSD [75], anorexia nervosa [72], bulimia nervosa [74], binge eating disorder [73], alcohol use disorder [79], substance use disorders [80,81] and pre/post-natal depression [76][77][78].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.7 Exercise and Mental Health Symptoms
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [75] Rosenbaum S, Vancampfort D, Steel Z, Newby J, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Physical activity in the treatment of Post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):130–6. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Vancampfort D, Vanderlinden J, De Hert M, et al. A systematic review of physical therapy interventions for patients with anorexia and bulemia nervosa. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(8):628–34. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, based on the current AMSTAR+ scores publication bias was potentially problematic for the majority of the meta-analyses, potentially overestimating the pooled effect sizes.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, most RCTs have focussed on aerobic exercise in people with clinical anxiety/stress disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.5 Exercise and Stress Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Limited number of RCTs”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“use of | self-report measures”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Paucity of data, participants”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Paucity of intervention studies | (no RCTs)”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“6 studies | showed improved psychologi- | cal wellbeing”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Moola FJGS, Amara CE. Exercise in the care of patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of the literature. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):59–68. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diversity of studies”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“insufficient evidence to | make any firm conclusions”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data extraction was undertaken by four pairs of authors.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.5 Data Extraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four independent pairs of authors searched MEDLINE/Pub-Med, PsycINFO and EMBASE from inception to 1/10/2018, for systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating exercise interventions (defined below) across a range of mental disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.1 Searches
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, a broad spectrum of mental disorders are associated with cognitive dysfunction, for which current treatments are limited [39][40][41][42][43].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 2.1 Searches
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Kahn RS, Keefe RS. Schizophrenia is a cognitive illness: time for a change in focus. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(10):1107–12. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [40] Elias LR, Miskowiak KW, Vale AM, et al. Cognitive impairment in euthymic pediatric bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(4):286–96. source
- Not matchedcites [41] Bortolato B, Miskowiak KW, Kohler CA, Vieta E, Carvalho AF. Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:3111–25.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise may be an effective adjunct treatment for those with substance use disorders in terms of abstinence and withdrawal and also improve mood”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.2.5 Alcohol Use Disorder/Any Substance Use Disorder
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, almost all the included studies did not set out with the primary objective to influence cognition and no studies included people with cognitive dysfunction at baseline.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite these aforementioned limitations, the field of exercise science has in the space of 20 years made significant strides in establishing itself as an important adjunctive treatment for mental disorders, underpinned by ever increasing robust science.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is consistent evidence that exercise can reduce depressive symptoms in children, adults and older adults with encouraging evidence in anxiety and stress disorders, children with ADHD and people with schizophrenia spectrum.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among people with elevated mental health symptoms, exercise can improve multiple mental health outcomes in those with anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, alcohol use disorders, substance use disorders and pre-and post-natal depression; however, further research is needed in these conditions.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beyond MDD, we are not yet at the stage of making evidence-based bespoke recommendations on the optimal clinical delivery of exercise.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.8 Strengths and Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, in those with mental disorders, there is promising evidence that exercise has a positive impact on mental health symptoms and tentative evidence for benefits for cognition in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise may be associated | with improved depressive | symptoms; however, the | evidence does not confirm | a cause-effect relationship | between mood and exercise”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the | evidence does not confirm | a cause-effect relationship | between mood and exercise”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 5 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
No existing research has examined the potential efficacy of exercise as a transdiagnostic intervention across all classes of mental illness.
“Despite this rapid expansion of meta-analytic evidence on exercise interventions for improving mental and cognitive outcomes in individual classes of mental disorders, no existing research has examined the potential efficacy of exercise as a transdiagnostic intervention across all classes of mental illness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is little systematic examination of the evidence for aerobic, resistance and combined exercise modalities, which precludes translation into practice and policy.
“Furthermore, there is little systematic examination of the evidence for aerobic, resistance and combined exercise modalities, which precludes translation into practice and policy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The quality of these meta-analyses and the included trials has not been comprehensively evaluated.
“Moreover, the quality of these meta-analyses and the included trials has not been comprehensively evaluated, which is an indispensable step before more rigorous exercise recommendations are made.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“In schizophrenia and non-affective psychotic disorders, physical activity interventions across 8 RCTs did not significantly reduce total symptoms.”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The cognitive benefits of exercise in major depression were examined in eight trials, showing no overall benefits.”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“and in people receiving treatment for anxiety in primary care (n=4, SMD=0.32, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.01).”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“although exercise did significantly reduce depression in older adults with high levels of depression symptoms (n=8, N=267, SMD=-0.90, 95% CI: -1.51 to -0.29, p=0.004).”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, only small, non-significant benefits were observed in four trials deemed of 'high quality' and comparing exercise to other active control conditions (SMD=0.11, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.18, I²=62%).”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Only two trials examined the impact of exercise in older people with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and did not find a significant effect (SMD=-1.883, 95% CI: -4.21 to 0.44, p=0.11, I²=93%)”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A meta-analysis of RCTs in children with ADHD found moderately large, statistically significant effects of aerobic exercise for various outcomes, including attention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, anxiety and executive functions 77 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The most widely assessed condition was major depression, with four meta-analyses in adult samples finding significant positive effects of exercise interventions in comparison to various control conditions, including waitlist and usual treatment, control interventions of flexibility, stretching/relaxation and meditation, and placebo medications.”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The largest and most recent was a meta-analysis showing moderately large benefits of exercise across 35 RCTs in adults with depressive disorders (SMD=-0.66, 95% CI: -0.86 to -0.46, I²=81%).”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Exercise was also found to significantly improve global cognition in schizophrenia (n=7, SMD=0.412, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.64).”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, RCTs of exercise interventions which used at least 90 min of moderate to vigorous activity per week did significantly reduce total symptoms (SMD=-0.72, 95% CI: -1.14 to -0.29), positive symptoms (SMD=-0.54, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.13) and negative symptoms (SMD=-0.44, 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.09) more than control conditions 77 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, an earlier meta-analysis found inconsistent evidence for significant benefits, with the effects of exercise on anxiety disorders varying with regards to the type of control condition used 77 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
“Exercise reduced anxiety symptoms at the trial end point (SMD = -0.581,95% CI -1.0 to -0.76, p = 0.02, I 2 = 66%).”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders
Reported -0.581 · recomputed -0.88
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.1 Major Depression
“Data from one MA [69] of 5 RCTs found that aerobic exercise does not improve depressive symptoms”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
“It does appear from the paucity of RCTs available that aerobic exercise does improve depressive symptoms in schizophrenia [69].”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.4 Exercise and Schizophrenia/Serious Mental Illness
“Four meta-analyses investigated exercise in people with schizophrenia/serious mental illness [33,34,80,81].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
“Three meta-analyses investigated the benefits of exercise in schizophrenia spectrum disorders [33,34,69], whilst one investigated the benefits of exercise in people with serious mental illness [70].”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.5 Exercise and Stress Disorders
“In those with anxiety and stress disorders, there was evidence that exercise was effective versus non-active interventions in reducing anxiety symptoms [33,34,69].”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.5 Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders
“Overall, three meta-analyses investigated the benefits of exercise in anxiety and stress-related disorders [65][66][67].”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
“The AMSTAR and AMSTAR+ scores were all rated as 5 and 3, respectively.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.6 Schizophrenia Spectrum/Serious Mental Illness
“An older meta-analysis [70] (AMSTAR = 4, AMSTAR+ = 2) of people with serious mental illness”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 4.3 Exercise and Depressive Disorders
“A previous Cochrane review [64] found that exercise was not effective in reducing depressive symptoms in a subgroup of "high-quality" studies that included subthreshold depression.”
§ Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes > 3.1.3 Adults
“Brondino et al. [64] (AMSTAR = 10, AMSTAR+ = 4) investigated the potential benefits of exercise for cognitive symptoms in MDD.”
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans
Piercy, K. L., Troiano, R. P., Ballard, R. M., Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Galuska, D. A., George, S. M., & Olson, R. D. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14854 · Cited by 9,755
(1985) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 9,143
Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory
Erickson, K. I., Voss, M. W., Prakash, R. S., Basak, C., Szabo, A., Chaddock, L., Kim, J. S., Heo, S., Alves, H., White, S. M., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1015950108 · Cited by 4,855
Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 · Cited by 4,374
Physical Activity and Public Health in Older Adults
Nelson, M. E., Rejeski, W. J., Blair, S. N., Duncan, P. W., Judge, J. O., King, A. C., Macera, C. A., & Castaneda‐Sceppa, C. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.185650 · Cited by 3,057
Arcelus, J., Mitchell, A. J., Wales, J., & Nielsen, S. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74 · Cited by 2,864
Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews
Biddle, S. J. H., & Asare, M. (2011) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090185 · Cited by 2,447
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—DSM-IV-TR. 4th edition. In: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holmes, E. A., O'Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L., Ballard, C., Christensen, H., Cohen Silver, R., Everall, I., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30168-1 · Cited by 5,715
Firth, J., Solmi, M., Wootton, R. E., Vancampfort, D., Schuch, F. B., Hoare, E., Gilbody, S., Torous, J., Teasdale, S. B., Jackson, S. E., et al. (2020) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20773 · Cited by 1,242
Self-citationMeyer, J. D., McDowell, C. P., Lansing, J. E., Brower, C. S., Smith, L., Tully, M. A., & Herring, M. P. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186469 · Cited by 803
Self-citationEffects of Exercise on Brain and Cognition Across Age Groups and Health States
Stillman, C. M., Esteban‐Cornejo, I., Brown, B. M., Bender, C. M., & Erickson, K. I. (2020) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.04.010 · Cited by 444
Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence‐based atlas
Arango, C., Dragioti, E., Solmi, M., Cortese, S., Domschke, K., Murray, R. M., Jones, P. B., Uher, R., Carvalho, A. F., Reichenberg, A., et al. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20894 · Cited by 349
“Maternal SSRI use during pregnancy* ADHD 5 (56,502) 1.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashdown-Franks, G., Firth, J., Carney, R., Carvalho, A. F., Hallgren, M., Koyanagi, A., Rosenbaum, S., Schuch, F. B., Smith, L., Solmi, M., Vancampfort, D., & Stubbs, B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
- Black Dog Institute (AU)
- Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
- Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
- University of Padua (IT)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stubbs, Brendon
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2019-09-20
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-170
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W2972381227
- Semantic Scholar
- dd8fc6feeb89fead775c12a9ba526edecfb7be02
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 129
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Research Capability Fund via Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
- Health Education England and NIHR Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme (ICA-CL-2017-03-001)
- Blackmores Institute Fellowship
- Maudsley Charity and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Mitacs Canada Globalink
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- exercise medicine, mental illness, substance use disorders, severe mental illness, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, stress disorders, alcoholism, eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, postpartum depression, neuropsychological outcomes, neuropsychiatric symptoms, adjunctive therapy, exercise intervention
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review