Cited by 460Physical Activity and HealthSchizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 76 of the 193 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes

Open access

Abstract

Background Exercise may improve neuropsychiatric and cognitive symptoms in people with mental disorders, but the totality of the evidence is unclear. We conducted a meta-review of exercise in (1) serious mental illness (schizophrenia spectrum, bipolar disorder and major depression (MDD)); (2) anxiety and stress disorders; (3) alcohol and substance use disorders; (4) eating disorders (anorexia nervosa bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorders, and (5) other mental disorders (including ADHD, pre/post-natal depression). Methods Systematic searches of major databases from inception until 1/10/2018 were undertaken to identify meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise in people with clinically diagnosed mental disorders. In the absence of available meta-analyses for a mental disorder, we identified systematic reviews of exercise interventions in people with elevated mental health symptoms that included non-RCTs. Meta-analysis quality was assessed with the AMSTAR/+. Results Overall, we identified 27 systematic reviews (including 16 meta-analyses representing 152 RCTs). Among those with MDD, we found consistent evidence (meta-analyses = 8) that exercise reduced depression in children, adults and older adults. Evidence also indicates that exercise was more effective than control conditions in reducing anxiety symptoms (meta-analyses = 3), and as an adjunctive treatment for reducing positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (meta-analyses = 2). Regarding neurocognitive effects, exercise improved global cognition in schizophrenia (meta-analyses = 1), children with ADHD (meta-analyses = 1), but not in MDD (meta-analyses = 1). Among those with elevated symptoms, positive mental health benefits were observed for exercise in people with pre/post-natal depression, anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders/substance use disorders. Adverse events were sparsely reported. Conclusion Our panoramic meta-overview suggests that exercise can be an effective adjunctive treatment for improving symptoms across a broad range of mental disorders.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-019-01187-6

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

70 No full text of the sources · 30 Partly supported · 24 No basis given · 18 Own interpretation · 12 Supported · 12 Own result · 10 Supported so far · 4 Sources not found · 4 Not checked yet · 3 Own method · 2 Mixed support · 2 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 1 references — free account

Show all 133 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 41
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 8
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13
58 of 58
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No existing research has examined the potential efficacy of exercise as a transdiagnostic intervention across all classes of mental illness.

    “Despite this rapid expansion of meta-analytic evidence on exercise interventions for improving mental and cognitive outcomes in individual classes of mental disorders, no existing research has examined the potential efficacy of exercise as a transdiagnostic intervention across all classes of mental illness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is little systematic examination of the evidence for aerobic, resistance and combined exercise modalities, which precludes translation into practice and policy.

    “Furthermore, there is little systematic examination of the evidence for aerobic, resistance and combined exercise modalities, which precludes translation into practice and policy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The quality of these meta-analyses and the included trials has not been comprehensively evaluated.

    “Moreover, the quality of these meta-analyses and the included trials has not been comprehensively evaluated, which is an indispensable step before more rigorous exercise recommendations are made.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

6 of 6

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—DSM-IV-TR. 4th edition. In: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Ashdown-Franks, G., Firth, J., Carney, R., Carvalho, A. F., Hallgren, M., Koyanagi, A., Rosenbaum, S., Schuch, F. B., Smith, L., Solmi, M., Vancampfort, D., & Stubbs, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Stubbs, Brendon
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
151-170
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2972381227
Cited by
460
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Capability Fund via Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
  • Health Education England and NIHR Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme (ICA-CL-2017-03-001)
  • Blackmores Institute Fellowship
  • Maudsley Charity and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Mitacs Canada Globalink
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
exercise medicine, mental illness, substance use disorders, severe mental illness, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, stress disorders, alcoholism, eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, postpartum depression, neuropsychological outcomes, neuropsychiatric symptoms, adjunctive therapy, exercise intervention
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review