Cited by 30Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionWorkplace Violence and Bullying

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

School Bullying, Perpetration, and Cyberhate: Overlapping Issues

Open access
Blaya, Catherine, Audrin, Catherine, Skrzypiec, Grace·2022·Contemporary School Psychology

Abstract

In an international context of increasing racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and Islamophobia in Europe and the USA (FRA, 2013; Hawdon et al. 2015), social media provide a privileged tool for propaganda and victimization. Issues of racism and xenophobia have become more prevalent both in “real life” and on the Internet. This study presents the results of a self-reported questionnaire survey on cyberhate among 1900 French students, age 12–20, where we investigated the association between school bullying and cyberhate victimization and perpetration. Findings show that bullying and cyberhate are a common experience for quite a few young people. Structural equation models provide evidence of the association between ordinary offline victimization and involvement in cyberhate. Our findings for cyberhate provide further evidence suggesting an overlap between traditional bullying and cyberbullying. They confirm the need for further research to acquire a better understanding of the processes that underscore individual involvement in online hate in order to inform effective interventions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40688-020-00318-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Awan, I., & Zempi, I. (2016). The affinity between online and offline anti-Muslim hate crime: Dynamics and impacts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.001. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baldry, A. C., Sorrentino, A., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Cyberbullying and cybervictimization versus parental supervision, monitoring and control of adolescents’ online activities. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 302–307. · DOI
  3. Baldry, A., Blaya, C., Farrington D. (Eds.). (2018). International perspectives on cyberbullying. Palgrave studies in cybercrime and cybersecurity. London: Palgrave MacMillan. · DOI
  4. Blaya, C. (2015). In Murat, F. et C. Simonis-Sueur. L’école à l’ère du 2.0 : climat scolaire et cyberviolence. Climat scolaire et bien –être. Education et Formations n°88–89(32), 29–39.
  5. Blaya, C., & Audrin, C. (2019). Toward an understanding of the characteristics of secondary school cyberhate perpetrators. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00046. · DOI
  6. Blaya, C., & Gatti, U. (2010). Deviant youth groups in Italy and France: Prevalence and characteristics. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 16(2), 127–144. · DOI
  7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chakraborti, N. (2018). Responding to hate crime: Escalating problems, continued failings. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(4), 387–404. · DOI
  9. Corcoran, H., Lader, D., & Smith, K. (2016). Hate crime, England and Wales. Statistical Bulletin, 5, 15.
  10. Dooley, J. J., Pyzalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face to-face bullying. Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 182–188.
  11. Foxman, A. H., & Wolf, C. (2013). Viral hate: Containing its spread on the internet. New York: Macmillan.
  12. Hawdon, J., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Online extremism and online hate: Exposure among adolescents and young adults in four nations. Nordicom Information: Medie-och kommunikationsforskning i Norden, 37(3–4), 29–37.
  13. Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 59–65. · DOI
  14. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.09.003. · DOI
  17. Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Online harassment in context: Trends from three youth internet safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 53–69. · DOI
  18. Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2018). Did the risk of exposure to online hate increase after the November 2015 Paris attacks? A group relations approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 90–97. · DOI
  19. Keipi, T., Näsi, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2016). Online hate and harmful content: Cross-national perspectives (p. 154). Taylor & Francis. · DOI
  20. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13–S20. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lennings, C. J., Amon, K. L., Brummert, H., & Lennings, N. J. (2010). Grooming for terror: The Internet and young people. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710903566979. · DOI
  22. Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4). · DOI
  23. Livingstone S., Haddon L., Görzig A., & Olafsson K (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/ · DOI
  24. Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net Children Go Mobile: Risks and opportunities (2nd ed.). Milano: Educatt.
  25. McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 247–255. · DOI
  26. Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 362–374. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2012). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  28. Oksanen, A., Hawdon, J., Hokeri, E. Näsi, M., Räsänen, P. (2014). Exposure to online hate among young social media users, in M. N. Warehime (ed.) Soul of society a focus on the lives of children and youth (sociological studies of children and youth, volume 18). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 253-273. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Perry, B., & Olsson, P. (2009). Cyberhate: The globalization of hate. Information & Communications Technology Law, 18(2), 185–199. · DOI
  30. Quandt, T. and Festl, R. (2017). Cyberhate. In The international encyclopedia of media effects (Eds P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner and L. Zoonen). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0215. · DOI
  31. Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 564–575. · DOI
  32. Riebel, J., Jäger, R. S., & Fischer, U. C. (2009). Cyberbullying in Germany-an exploration of prevalence, overlapping with real life bullying and coping strategies. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51, 298–314 10.1.1.599.3516&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 15 July 2020.
  33. Smith, P. K., Sundaram, S., Spears, B. A., Blaya, C., Schäfer, M., & Sandhu, D. (Eds.). (2018). Bullying, cyberbullying and student well-being in schools. Comparing European, Australian and Indian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
  36. Tynes, B. (2006). Children, adolescents, and the culture of online hate. In N. E. Dowd, D. G. Singer, & R. F. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of children, culture, and violence (pp. 267–289). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  37. Tynes, B., Del Toro, J., & Lozada, T. (2015). An unwelcomed digital visitor in the classroom: The longitudinal impact of online racial discrimination on academic motivation. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-15-0095.1. · DOI
  38. Wachs, S., Wright, M. F., & Vazsonyi, A. T. (2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29(3), 179–188. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Javed, A., Liu, H., & Ozalp, S. (2020). Hate in the machine: Anti-Black and anti-Muslim social media posts as predictors of offline racially and religiously aggravated crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz049. · DOI
  40. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S51–S58. · DOI
  41. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., & Korchmaros, J. D. (2011). National trends in exposure to and experiences of violence on the internet among children. Pediatrics, 128(6), 1376–1386. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0118. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blaya, C., Audrin, C., & Skrzypiec, G.
Affiliations
  • Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Blaya, Catherine
Venue
Contemporary School Psychology
Published
2020-09-04
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
341-349
ISSN
  • 2159-2020 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-1505
OpenAlex
W3083533112
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Contemporary School Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
school bullying, cyberhate, cyberbullying, online hate, bullying perpetration, bullying victimization, racism, xenophobia, antisemitism, Islamophobia, social media, adolescents, French students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review