The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
School Bullying, Perpetration, and Cyberhate: Overlapping Issues
Open accessAbstract
In an international context of increasing racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and Islamophobia in Europe and the USA (FRA, 2013; Hawdon et al. 2015), social media provide a privileged tool for propaganda and victimization. Issues of racism and xenophobia have become more prevalent both in “real life” and on the Internet. This study presents the results of a self-reported questionnaire survey on cyberhate among 1900 French students, age 12–20, where we investigated the association between school bullying and cyberhate victimization and perpetration. Findings show that bullying and cyberhate are a common experience for quite a few young people. Structural equation models provide evidence of the association between ordinary offline victimization and involvement in cyberhate. Our findings for cyberhate provide further evidence suggesting an overlap between traditional bullying and cyberbullying. They confirm the need for further research to acquire a better understanding of the processes that underscore individual involvement in online hate in order to inform effective interventions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only Blaya & Audrin (2019) and Blaya et al. (2020) narrowed down the group features exclusively to ethnic or religious backgrounds.
“Only Blaya & Audrin (2019) and Blaya et al. (2020) narrowed down the group features exclusively to ethnic or religious backgrounds.”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al. (2020)
Only a minority of definitions considered the harmfulness of hate speech in terms of a given community or social group.
“Only a minority of definitions (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Räsänen et al., 2016; Wachs et al., 2021a) considered the harmfulness of hate speech in terms of a given community or social group (e.g., disintegration of social cohesion, advocacy of hatred, rejection, violence, or hostility).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Aspects of perpetration that refer to a person-centered basis of hate speech behavior-such as prejudice, bias, a devaluating attitude, hatred, or, most often, the purpose, aim or intention to harm-were mentioned in nine definitions.
“Aspects of perpetration that refer to a person-centered basis of hate speech behavior—such as prejudice, bias, a devaluating attitude, hatred, or, most often, the purpose, aim or intention to harm—were mentioned in nine definitions (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Vaught, 2012; Wachs et al., 2019, 2020, 2021a).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Only a few definitions considered whether hate speech had occurred publicly or in private, directly or indirectly.
“Only a few definitions considered whether hate speech had occurred publicly or in private (Blaya et al., 2020), directly or indirectly (Wachs et al., 2019, 2021a).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Seven studies, related to 14 publications, reported quantitative data for hate speech victimization.
“Seven studies, related to 14 publications, reported quantitative data for hate speech victimization (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Elpus & Carter, 2016; Lehmann, 2019, 2020; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; van Dorn, 2004; Wachs et al., 2019, 2020, 2021a, Wachs & Wright, 2018, 2019, 2020).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Four studies, related to ten publications, reported frequencies of online hate speech perpetration.
“Four studies, related to ten publications, reported frequencies of online hate speech perpetration (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Wachs et al., 2019b, 2019a, 2021a, Wachs & Wright, 2018, 2019, 2020).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
The prevalence of hate speech was generally studied and reported in online contexts.
“The prevalence of hate speech was generally studied and reported in online contexts (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Tynes, 2005; Wachs et al., 2019b, 2019a, 2020, 2021a, Wachs & Wright, 2018, 2019, 2020).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Only two studies, related to four publications, assessed whether online hate posts were searched for deliberately or not.
“Only two studies, related to four publications, assessed whether online hate posts were searched for deliberately or not (Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Blaya et al., 2020; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Locations mediated by ICT were referred to either globally or with items pointing to specific Internet sites, social media tools, or technologies.
“Locations mediated by ICT (e.g., sites on the Internet) were referred to either globally (e.g., Wachs et al., 2021a) or with items pointing to specific Internet sites, social media tools, or technologies (e.g., Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Blaya et al., 2020; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
The specific target group was not identified in items used by Blaya et al. (2020) and Blaya & Audrin (2019).
“The specific target group was not identified in items used by Blaya et al. (2020) and Blaya & Audrin (2019).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al. (2020)
The remaining publications reported exposure rates within this range.
“The remaining publications reported exposure rates within this range (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Lehmann, 2019, 2020; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Tynes, 2005; van Dorn, 2004; Wachs et al., 2019; Wachs & Wright, 2018).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
For those perpetrators identified, such characteristics included, for instance, prejudicial views of minorities or toxic online disinhibition.
“For those perpetrators identified, such characteristics included, for instance, prejudicial views of minorities (Blaya et al., 2020; Wachs et al., 2020) or toxic online disinhibition (Wachs & Wright, 2018).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Looking at relationship features, power imbalances may also link cyberbullying and cyberhate.
“Looking at relationship features, power imbalances may also link cyberbullying and cyberhate (Blaya et al., 2020).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
In Western European countries, perpetration rates varied from 5.2% in France to 11.3% in Germany.
“In Western European countries, perpetration rates varied from 5.2% in France (Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Blaya et al., 2020) to 11.3% in Germany (Wachs et al., 2019a, 2019, Wachs & Wright, 2018, 2019, 2020).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
The means and contexts in which both phenomena become apparent were also regarded as being similar.
“The means and contexts in which both phenomena become apparent were also regarded as being similar (Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Blaya et al., 2020).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
In 12 publications bullying was the concept that was seen to most closely overlap with hate speech and online or cyberhate.
“In 12 publications bullying was the concept that was seen to most closely overlap with hate speech and online or cyberhate (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Elpus & Carter, 2016; Lehmann, 2019, 2020; Oksanen et al., 2014; Räsänen et al., 2016; Wachs et al., 2019a, 2019, 2020, Wachs & Wright, 2018, 2019).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Findings on empirical associations between bullying and online hate speech were reported in four publications.
“Findings on empirical associations between bullying and online hate speech were reported in four publications (Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Lehmann, 2019; Wachs et al., 2019).”
From A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena (2023) · cites this paper as Blaya et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims: Distinct Groups of At-Risk Youth
Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. (2001) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431601021001002 · Cited by 897
Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying: A Theoretical and Conceptual Review
Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182 · Cited by 790
Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying
Kowalski, R. M., Morgan, C. A., & Limber, S. P. (2012) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034312445244 · Cited by 310
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Awan, I., & Zempi, I. (2016). The affinity between online and offline anti-Muslim hate crime: Dynamics and impacts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.001. · DOI · Paper page
- Baldry, A. C., Sorrentino, A., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Cyberbullying and cybervictimization versus parental supervision, monitoring and control of adolescents’ online activities. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 302–307. · DOI
- Baldry, A., Blaya, C., Farrington D. (Eds.). (2018). International perspectives on cyberbullying. Palgrave studies in cybercrime and cybersecurity. London: Palgrave MacMillan. · DOI
- Blaya, C. (2015). In Murat, F. et C. Simonis-Sueur. L’école à l’ère du 2.0 : climat scolaire et cyberviolence. Climat scolaire et bien –être. Education et Formations n°88–89(32), 29–39.
- Blaya, C., & Audrin, C. (2019). Toward an understanding of the characteristics of secondary school cyberhate perpetrators. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00046. · DOI
- Blaya, C., & Gatti, U. (2010). Deviant youth groups in Italy and France: Prevalence and characteristics. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 16(2), 127–144. · DOI
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005. · DOI · Paper page
- Chakraborti, N. (2018). Responding to hate crime: Escalating problems, continued failings. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(4), 387–404. · DOI
- Corcoran, H., Lader, D., & Smith, K. (2016). Hate crime, England and Wales. Statistical Bulletin, 5, 15.
- Dooley, J. J., Pyzalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face to-face bullying. Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 182–188.
- Foxman, A. H., & Wolf, C. (2013). Viral hate: Containing its spread on the internet. New York: Macmillan.
- Hawdon, J., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Online extremism and online hate: Exposure among adolescents and young adults in four nations. Nordicom Information: Medie-och kommunikationsforskning i Norden, 37(3–4), 29–37.
- Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 59–65. · DOI
- Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221. · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. · DOI · Paper page
- Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.09.003. · DOI
- Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Online harassment in context: Trends from three youth internet safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 53–69. · DOI
- Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2018). Did the risk of exposure to online hate increase after the November 2015 Paris attacks? A group relations approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 90–97. · DOI
- Keipi, T., Näsi, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2016). Online hate and harmful content: Cross-national perspectives (p. 154). Taylor & Francis. · DOI
- Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13–S20. · DOI · Paper page
- Lennings, C. J., Amon, K. L., Brummert, H., & Lennings, N. J. (2010). Grooming for terror: The Internet and young people. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710903566979. · DOI
- Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4). · DOI
- Livingstone S., Haddon L., Görzig A., & Olafsson K (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/ · DOI
- Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net Children Go Mobile: Risks and opportunities (2nd ed.). Milano: Educatt.
- McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 247–255. · DOI
- Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 362–374. · DOI · Paper page
- Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2012). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
- Oksanen, A., Hawdon, J., Hokeri, E. Näsi, M., Räsänen, P. (2014). Exposure to online hate among young social media users, in M. N. Warehime (ed.) Soul of society a focus on the lives of children and youth (sociological studies of children and youth, volume 18). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 253-273. · DOI · Paper page
- Perry, B., & Olsson, P. (2009). Cyberhate: The globalization of hate. Information & Communications Technology Law, 18(2), 185–199. · DOI
- Quandt, T. and Festl, R. (2017). Cyberhate. In The international encyclopedia of media effects (Eds P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner and L. Zoonen). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0215. · DOI
- Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 564–575. · DOI
- Riebel, J., Jäger, R. S., & Fischer, U. C. (2009). Cyberbullying in Germany-an exploration of prevalence, overlapping with real life bullying and coping strategies. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51, 298–314 10.1.1.599.3516&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 15 July 2020.
- Smith, P. K., Sundaram, S., Spears, B. A., Blaya, C., Schäfer, M., & Sandhu, D. (Eds.). (2018). Bullying, cyberbullying and student well-being in schools. Comparing European, Australian and Indian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. · DOI · Paper page
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
- Tynes, B. (2006). Children, adolescents, and the culture of online hate. In N. E. Dowd, D. G. Singer, & R. F. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of children, culture, and violence (pp. 267–289). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Tynes, B., Del Toro, J., & Lozada, T. (2015). An unwelcomed digital visitor in the classroom: The longitudinal impact of online racial discrimination on academic motivation. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-15-0095.1. · DOI
- Wachs, S., Wright, M. F., & Vazsonyi, A. T. (2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29(3), 179–188. · DOI · Paper page
- Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Javed, A., Liu, H., & Ozalp, S. (2020). Hate in the machine: Anti-Black and anti-Muslim social media posts as predictors of offline racially and religiously aggravated crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz049. · DOI
- Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S51–S58. · DOI
- Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., & Korchmaros, J. D. (2011). National trends in exposure to and experiences of violence on the internet among children. Pediatrics, 128(6), 1376–1386. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0118. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kansok-Dusche, J., Ballaschk, C., Krause, N., Zeißig, A., Seemann-Herz, L., Wachs, S., & Bilz, L. (2023) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380221108070 · Cited by 112
“Other authors connect hate speech and bullying via the perpetrator’s intention to harm a person or group (e.g., Blaya et al., 2020; Blaya & Audrin, 2019; Lehmann, 2020; Räsänen et al., 2016; Wachs et al., 2019, 2020; Wachs & Wright, 2019).”
InfluentialHate speech in adolescents: A binational study on prevalence and demographic differences
Castellanos, M., Wettstein, A., Wachs, S., Kansok-Dusche, J., Ballaschk, C., Krause, N., & Bilz, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1076249 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Blaya, C., Audrin, C., & Skrzypiec, G.
- Affiliations
- Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Blaya, Catherine
- Venue
- Contemporary School Psychology
- Published
- 2020-09-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-349
- ISSN
- 2159-2020 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-1505
- OpenAlex
- W3083533112
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Contemporary School Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- school bullying, cyberhate, cyberbullying, online hate, bullying perpetration, bullying victimization, racism, xenophobia, antisemitism, Islamophobia, social media, adolescents, French students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review