The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Communication and Persuasion · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 · Cited by 3,202
Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413 · Cited by 1,691
Self-citationHuman problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970.
Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1971) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0030806 · Cited by 635
Accountability and the Perseverance of First Impressions
Tetlock, P. E. (1983) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3033716 · Cited by 513
Primacy Effects in Clinical Judgments of Contingency
Curley, S. P., Young, M. J., Kingry, M. J., & Yates, J. F. (1988) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x8800800310 · Cited by 32
Research works printed but not linked: 91
- Allen, 1974, Tutor attributions and attitudes as a function of tutee performance, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 311, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02810.x · DOI
- Anderson, 1959, Test of a model for opinion change, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 371, 10.1037/h0042539 · DOI
- Anderson, 1964, Test of a model for number-averaging behavior, Psychonomic Science, 1, 191, 10.3758/BF03342858 · DOI
- Anderson, 1965, Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1, 10.1037/h0021966 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 1967, Application of a weighted average model to a psychophysical averaging task, Psychonomic Science, 8, 227, 10.3758/BF03331634 · DOI
- Anderson, 1968, Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 354, 10.1037/h0026816 · DOI
- Anderson, 1973, Information integration theory applied to attitudes about U.S. presidents, Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 1, 10.1037/h0033874 · DOI
- Anderson, 1973, Serial position curves in impression formation, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 8, 10.1037/h0033774 · doi:10.1037/h0033774
- Anderson, 1961, Primacy effects in personality impression formation, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 346, 10.1037/h0046719 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 1973, New light on order effects in attitude change, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 88, 10.1037/h0035578 · doi:10.1037/h0035578
- Anderson, 1963, Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 379, 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80039-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 1968, Further data on a weighted average model for judgment in a lifted weight task, Perception & Psychophysics, 4, 81, 10.3758/BF03209513 · DOI
- Anderson, 1964, Order effects in impression formation in four classes of stimuli, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 467, 10.1037/h0047472 · doi:10.1037/h0047472
- Asch, 1946, Forming impressions of personality, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258, 10.1037/h0055756 · DOI · Paper page
- Asch, 1984, Thinking about persons, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1230 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1230
- Ashton, 1988, Sequential belief revision in auditing, The Accounting Review, 63, 623
- Benassi, 1982, Effects of order presentation, primacy, and physical attractiveness on attributions of ability, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 48, 10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.48 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.48
- Bossart, 1966, Effects of context, frequency, and order of presentation of evaluative assertions on impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 538, 10.1037/h0023898 · DOI
- Butt, 1989, The effects of information order and hypothesis testing strategies on auditors' judgments, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14, 471, 10.1016/0361-3682(89)90012-3 · DOI
- Camerer, 1987, Do biases in probability judgments matter in markets? Experimental evidence, American Economic Review, 77, 981
- Carlson, 1988, Diagnostic reasoning with circumstantial evidence, Cognitive Psychology, 20, 463, 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90013-8 · DOI
- Chalmers, 1971, Repetition and order effects in attitude formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 219, 10.1037/h0030379 · DOI
- Cooper, 1984, Attitudes and attitude change, Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 395, 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.002143 · DOI · Paper page
- Crano, 1977, Primacy versus recency in retention of information and opinion change, Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 87, 10.1080/00224545.1977.9923987 · DOI
- Cromwell, 1950, The relative effect on audience attitude of the first versus the second argumentative speech of a series, Speech Monographs, 17, 105, 10.1080/03637755009375004 · DOI
- Cronbach, 1975, Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology, American Psychologist, 30, 116, 10.1037/h0076829 · DOI · Paper page
- Dale, 1968, Weighing evidence: An attempt to assess the efficiency of the human operator, Ergonomics, 11, 215, 10.1080/00140136808930967 · doi:10.1080/00140136808930967
- De Wit, 1989, Effects of diazepam on a belief-updating task, Psychological Reports, 64, 219, 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.1.219 · doi:10.2466/pr0.1989.64.1.219
- Dillard, J. F., Kauffman, N. L., & Spires, E. E. (in press). Evidence order and belief revision in management accounting decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society. · DOI
- Dreben, 1979, The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1758, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1758 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1758 · Paper page
- Einhorn, 1986, Judging probable cause, Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3, 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · Paper page
- Feldman, 1977, Degree and sequence of success as determinants of self-attribution of ability, The Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 223, 10.1080/00224545.1977.9713268 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1977.9713268
- Feldman, 1978, Primacy effects in self-attribution of ability, Journal of Personality, 46, 732, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00194.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00194.x
- Fischhoff, 1983, Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective, Psychological Review, 90, 239, 10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.239 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.3.239 · Paper page
- Furnham, 1986, The robustness of the recency effect: Studies using legal evidence, The Journal of General Psychology, 113, 351, 10.1080/00221309.1986.9711045 · DOI
- Goldstein, 1987, Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena, Psychological Review, 94, 236, 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.236 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.236 · Paper page
- Hastie, 1983, Social inference, Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 511, 10.1146/annurev.ps.34.020183.002455 · DOI
- Hatvany, 1980, The impact of a discredited key witness, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 490, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00728.x · DOI
- Hendrick, 1970, Effects of varying trait inconsistency and response requirements on the primacy effect in impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 158, 10.1037/h0029203 · DOI
- Hendrick, 1970, Number averaging behavior: A primacy effect, Psychonomic Science, 19, 121, 10.3758/BF03337452 · doi:10.3758/bf03337452
- Hendrick, 1973, Attention decrement, temporal variation, and the primacy effect in impression formation, Memory & Cognition, 1, 193, 10.3758/BF03198093 · DOI
- Hoch, 1984, Availability and interference in predictive judgment, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 649
- Hogarth, 1975, Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 271, 10.1080/01621459.1975.10479858 · DOI · Paper page
- Hogarth, 1986, Generalization in decision research: The role of formal models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-16, 439, 10.1109/TSMC.1986.4308976 · DOI
- Insko, 1964, Primacy versus recency in persuasion as a function of the timing of arguments and measures, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 381, 10.1037/h0042765 · DOI
- Jones, 1979, The rocky road from acts to dispositions, American Psychologist, 34, 104, 10.1037/0003-066X.34.2.107 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.2.107 · Paper page
- Jones, 1968, Pattern of performance and ability attribution, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 317, 10.1037/h0026818 · DOI · Paper page
- Kruglanski, 1983, The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448, 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Lana, 1961, Familiarity and the order of presentation of persuasive communications, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 573, 10.1037/h0046634 · DOI
- Langer, 1975, Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951, 10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.951 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.951 · Paper page
- Levin, 1976, Processing of deviant information in inference and descriptive tasks with simultaneous and serial presentation, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 195, 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90037-4 · DOI
- Levin, 1977, The processing of deviant information in prediction and evaluation, Memory & Cognition, 5, 679, 10.3758/BF03197415 · doi:10.3758/bf03197415
- Levin, 1969, Sequential effects in impression formation with binary intermittent responding, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 283, 10.1037/h0027045 · doi:10.1037/h0027045
- Levin, 1970, Differential influence of information in an impressionformation task with binary intermittent responding, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 374, 10.1037/h0029205 · doi:10.1037/h0029205
- Lichtenstein, 1987, Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 93, 10.1016/0022-1031(87)90027-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Lopes, 1985, Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian influence, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 509, 10.3758/BF03329868 · DOI
- Lopes, 1987, Procedural debiasing, Acta Psychologica, 64, 167, 10.1016/0001-6918(87)90005-9 · DOI
- Lopes, 1987, Beyond hope and fear: The psychology of risk, Vol. 20, 255
- Luchins, 1958, Definitiveness of impression and primacy-recency in communications, The Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 275, 10.1080/00224545.1958.9919292 · DOI
- Luchins, 1962, Personality impressions from communications reflecting attitudes toward segregation, The Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 315, 10.1080/00224545.1962.9712382 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1962.9712382
- Luchins, 1962, Primacy-recency in communications reflecting attitudes toward segregation, The Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 357, 10.1080/00224545.1962.9712387 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1962.9712387
- Luchins, 1970, The effects of order of presentation of information and explanatory models, The Journal of Social Psychology, 80, 63, 10.1080/00224545.1970.9712520 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1970.9712520
- Luchins, 1984, Conceptions of personality and order effects in forming impressions, The Journal of General Psychology, 110, 165, 10.1080/00221309.1984.9709962 · DOI
- Luchins, 1986, Primacy and recency effects with descriptions of moral and immoral behavior, The Journal of General Psychology, 113, 159, 10.1080/00221309.1986.9710553 · DOI
- Lund, 1925, The psychology of belief: A study of its emotional and volitional determinants, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 20, 174, 10.1037/h0066996 · DOI
- McAndrew, 1981, Pattern of performance and attributions of ability and gender, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 583, 10.1177/014616728174010 · doi:10.1177/014616728174010
- Miller, 1961, Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurement, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1, 10.1037/h0049330 · DOI · Paper page
- Newtson, 1979, Variation in behavior perception and ability attribution, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1847, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1847 · DOI
- Parducci, 1968, Stimulus averaging and the context for judgment, Perception and Psychophysics, 3, 145, 10.3758/BF03212782 · DOI
- Payne, 1982, Contingent decision behavior, Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382, 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382 · Paper page
- Pennington, 1986, Evidence evaluation in complex decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242 · Paper page
- Peterson, 1967, Man as an intuitive statistician, Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29, 10.1037/h0024722 · DOI · Paper page
- Peterson, 1967, A primacy effect in subjective probability revision, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 61, 10.1037/h0024139 · DOI
- Pitz, 1968, Payoff effects in sequential decision-making, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 249, 10.1037/h0025802 · doi:10.1037/h0025802
- Pratz, 1987, Computer presentation of pattern-of-success: A primacy effect verified, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 379, 10.2466/pms.1987.65.2.379 · doi:10.2466/pms.1987.65.2.379
- Robinson, 1985, Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 443
- Roby, 1967, Belief states and sequential evidence, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 236, 10.1037/h0024996 · doi:10.1037/h0024996
- Rosenbaum, 1968, Impression formation as a function of source credibility and order of presentation of contradictory information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 167, 10.1037/h0026388 · DOI
- Schum, 1982, Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence, Law and Society Review, 17, 105, 10.2307/3053534 · DOI
- Shanteau, 1970, An additive model for sequential decision making, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 181, 10.1037/h0029552 · DOI
- Shanteau, 1972, Descriptive versus normative models of sequential inference judgment, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 63, 10.1037/h0032509 · DOI
- Slovic, 1971, Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649, 10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-X · DOI · Paper page
- Stewart, 1965, Effect of continuous responding on the order effect in personality impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 161, 10.1037/h0021641 · DOI
- Strange, 1978, Effects of the structure of descriptions on group impression formation, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 224, 10.3758/BF03329677 · doi:10.3758/bf03329677
- Tesser, 1968, Differential weighting and directed meaning as explanations of primacy in impression formation, Psychonomic Science, 11, 299, 10.3758/BF03328201 · DOI
- Tiwari, 1978, Primacy-recency effects in impression-formation as a function of dependence-independence proneness, Psychologia, 21, 143
- Tubbs, 1990, Recency effects in the auditor's belief revision process, The Accounting Review, 65, 452
- Tversky, 1988, Contingent weighting in judgment and choice, Psychological Review, 95, 371, 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371 · DOI · Paper page
- Walker, 1972, Order of presentation at trial, Yale Law Journal, 82, 216, 10.2307/795112 · doi:10.2307/795112
- Weiss, 1969, Subjective averaging of length with serial presentation, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 52, 10.1037/h0028028 · DOI
- Yates, 1986, Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement, Acta Psychologica, 62, 293, 10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2 · DOI
Cited by
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
The trouble with overconfidence.
Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.502 · Cited by 2,358
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
Bolton, R. N. (1998) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.45 · Cited by 1,948
Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511 · Cited by 1,448
Metadata
- Authors
- Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J.
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-55
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979410064
- Cited by
- 1,588
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j
- The paper
- Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.