Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,588

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model

Hogarth, Robin M, Einhorn, Hillel J·1992·Cognitive Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. Allen, 1974, Tutor attributions and attitudes as a function of tutee performance, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 311, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02810.x · DOI
  2. Anderson, 1959, Test of a model for opinion change, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 371, 10.1037/h0042539 · DOI
  3. Anderson, 1964, Test of a model for number-averaging behavior, Psychonomic Science, 1, 191, 10.3758/BF03342858 · DOI
  4. Anderson, 1965, Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1, 10.1037/h0021966 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Anderson, 1967, Application of a weighted average model to a psychophysical averaging task, Psychonomic Science, 8, 227, 10.3758/BF03331634 · DOI
  6. Anderson, 1968, Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 354, 10.1037/h0026816 · DOI
  7. Anderson, 1973, Information integration theory applied to attitudes about U.S. presidents, Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 1, 10.1037/h0033874 · DOI
  8. Anderson, 1973, Serial position curves in impression formation, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 8, 10.1037/h0033774 · doi:10.1037/h0033774
  9. Anderson, 1961, Primacy effects in personality impression formation, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 346, 10.1037/h0046719 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Anderson, 1973, New light on order effects in attitude change, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 88, 10.1037/h0035578 · doi:10.1037/h0035578
  11. Anderson, 1963, Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 379, 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80039-0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Anderson, 1968, Further data on a weighted average model for judgment in a lifted weight task, Perception & Psychophysics, 4, 81, 10.3758/BF03209513 · DOI
  13. Anderson, 1964, Order effects in impression formation in four classes of stimuli, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 467, 10.1037/h0047472 · doi:10.1037/h0047472
  14. Asch, 1946, Forming impressions of personality, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258, 10.1037/h0055756 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Asch, 1984, Thinking about persons, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1230 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1230
  16. Ashton, 1988, Sequential belief revision in auditing, The Accounting Review, 63, 623
  17. Benassi, 1982, Effects of order presentation, primacy, and physical attractiveness on attributions of ability, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 48, 10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.48 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.48
  18. Bossart, 1966, Effects of context, frequency, and order of presentation of evaluative assertions on impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 538, 10.1037/h0023898 · DOI
  19. Butt, 1989, The effects of information order and hypothesis testing strategies on auditors' judgments, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14, 471, 10.1016/0361-3682(89)90012-3 · DOI
  20. Camerer, 1987, Do biases in probability judgments matter in markets? Experimental evidence, American Economic Review, 77, 981
  21. Carlson, 1988, Diagnostic reasoning with circumstantial evidence, Cognitive Psychology, 20, 463, 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90013-8 · DOI
  22. Chalmers, 1971, Repetition and order effects in attitude formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 219, 10.1037/h0030379 · DOI
  23. Cooper, 1984, Attitudes and attitude change, Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 395, 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.002143 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Crano, 1977, Primacy versus recency in retention of information and opinion change, Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 87, 10.1080/00224545.1977.9923987 · DOI
  25. Cromwell, 1950, The relative effect on audience attitude of the first versus the second argumentative speech of a series, Speech Monographs, 17, 105, 10.1080/03637755009375004 · DOI
  26. Cronbach, 1975, Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology, American Psychologist, 30, 116, 10.1037/h0076829 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Dale, 1968, Weighing evidence: An attempt to assess the efficiency of the human operator, Ergonomics, 11, 215, 10.1080/00140136808930967 · doi:10.1080/00140136808930967
  28. De Wit, 1989, Effects of diazepam on a belief-updating task, Psychological Reports, 64, 219, 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.1.219 · doi:10.2466/pr0.1989.64.1.219
  29. Dillard, J. F., Kauffman, N. L., & Spires, E. E. (in press). Evidence order and belief revision in management accounting decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society. · DOI
  30. Dreben, 1979, The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1758, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1758 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1758 · Paper page
  31. Einhorn, 1986, Judging probable cause, Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3, 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · Paper page
  32. Feldman, 1977, Degree and sequence of success as determinants of self-attribution of ability, The Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 223, 10.1080/00224545.1977.9713268 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1977.9713268
  33. Feldman, 1978, Primacy effects in self-attribution of ability, Journal of Personality, 46, 732, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00194.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00194.x
  34. Fischhoff, 1983, Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective, Psychological Review, 90, 239, 10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.239 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.3.239 · Paper page
  35. Furnham, 1986, The robustness of the recency effect: Studies using legal evidence, The Journal of General Psychology, 113, 351, 10.1080/00221309.1986.9711045 · DOI
  36. Goldstein, 1987, Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena, Psychological Review, 94, 236, 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.236 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.236 · Paper page
  37. Hastie, 1983, Social inference, Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 511, 10.1146/annurev.ps.34.020183.002455 · DOI
  38. Hatvany, 1980, The impact of a discredited key witness, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 490, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00728.x · DOI
  39. Hendrick, 1970, Effects of varying trait inconsistency and response requirements on the primacy effect in impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 158, 10.1037/h0029203 · DOI
  40. Hendrick, 1970, Number averaging behavior: A primacy effect, Psychonomic Science, 19, 121, 10.3758/BF03337452 · doi:10.3758/bf03337452
  41. Hendrick, 1973, Attention decrement, temporal variation, and the primacy effect in impression formation, Memory & Cognition, 1, 193, 10.3758/BF03198093 · DOI
  42. Hoch, 1984, Availability and interference in predictive judgment, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 649
  43. Hogarth, 1975, Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 271, 10.1080/01621459.1975.10479858 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Hogarth, 1986, Generalization in decision research: The role of formal models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-16, 439, 10.1109/TSMC.1986.4308976 · DOI
  45. Insko, 1964, Primacy versus recency in persuasion as a function of the timing of arguments and measures, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 381, 10.1037/h0042765 · DOI
  46. Jones, 1979, The rocky road from acts to dispositions, American Psychologist, 34, 104, 10.1037/0003-066X.34.2.107 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.2.107 · Paper page
  47. Jones, 1968, Pattern of performance and ability attribution, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 317, 10.1037/h0026818 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Kruglanski, 1983, The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448, 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Lana, 1961, Familiarity and the order of presentation of persuasive communications, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 573, 10.1037/h0046634 · DOI
  50. Langer, 1975, Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951, 10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.951 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.951 · Paper page
  51. Levin, 1976, Processing of deviant information in inference and descriptive tasks with simultaneous and serial presentation, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 195, 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90037-4 · DOI
  52. Levin, 1977, The processing of deviant information in prediction and evaluation, Memory & Cognition, 5, 679, 10.3758/BF03197415 · doi:10.3758/bf03197415
  53. Levin, 1969, Sequential effects in impression formation with binary intermittent responding, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 283, 10.1037/h0027045 · doi:10.1037/h0027045
  54. Levin, 1970, Differential influence of information in an impressionformation task with binary intermittent responding, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 374, 10.1037/h0029205 · doi:10.1037/h0029205
  55. Lichtenstein, 1987, Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 93, 10.1016/0022-1031(87)90027-8 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Lopes, 1985, Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian influence, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 509, 10.3758/BF03329868 · DOI
  57. Lopes, 1987, Procedural debiasing, Acta Psychologica, 64, 167, 10.1016/0001-6918(87)90005-9 · DOI
  58. Lopes, 1987, Beyond hope and fear: The psychology of risk, Vol. 20, 255
  59. Luchins, 1958, Definitiveness of impression and primacy-recency in communications, The Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 275, 10.1080/00224545.1958.9919292 · DOI
  60. Luchins, 1962, Personality impressions from communications reflecting attitudes toward segregation, The Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 315, 10.1080/00224545.1962.9712382 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1962.9712382
  61. Luchins, 1962, Primacy-recency in communications reflecting attitudes toward segregation, The Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 357, 10.1080/00224545.1962.9712387 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1962.9712387
  62. Luchins, 1970, The effects of order of presentation of information and explanatory models, The Journal of Social Psychology, 80, 63, 10.1080/00224545.1970.9712520 · doi:10.1080/00224545.1970.9712520
  63. Luchins, 1984, Conceptions of personality and order effects in forming impressions, The Journal of General Psychology, 110, 165, 10.1080/00221309.1984.9709962 · DOI
  64. Luchins, 1986, Primacy and recency effects with descriptions of moral and immoral behavior, The Journal of General Psychology, 113, 159, 10.1080/00221309.1986.9710553 · DOI
  65. Lund, 1925, The psychology of belief: A study of its emotional and volitional determinants, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 20, 174, 10.1037/h0066996 · DOI
  66. McAndrew, 1981, Pattern of performance and attributions of ability and gender, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 583, 10.1177/014616728174010 · doi:10.1177/014616728174010
  67. Miller, 1961, Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurement, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1, 10.1037/h0049330 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Newtson, 1979, Variation in behavior perception and ability attribution, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1847, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1847 · DOI
  69. Parducci, 1968, Stimulus averaging and the context for judgment, Perception and Psychophysics, 3, 145, 10.3758/BF03212782 · DOI
  70. Payne, 1982, Contingent decision behavior, Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382, 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382 · Paper page
  71. Pennington, 1986, Evidence evaluation in complex decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242 · Paper page
  72. Peterson, 1967, Man as an intuitive statistician, Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29, 10.1037/h0024722 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Peterson, 1967, A primacy effect in subjective probability revision, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 61, 10.1037/h0024139 · DOI
  74. Pitz, 1968, Payoff effects in sequential decision-making, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 249, 10.1037/h0025802 · doi:10.1037/h0025802
  75. Pratz, 1987, Computer presentation of pattern-of-success: A primacy effect verified, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 379, 10.2466/pms.1987.65.2.379 · doi:10.2466/pms.1987.65.2.379
  76. Robinson, 1985, Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 443
  77. Roby, 1967, Belief states and sequential evidence, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 236, 10.1037/h0024996 · doi:10.1037/h0024996
  78. Rosenbaum, 1968, Impression formation as a function of source credibility and order of presentation of contradictory information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 167, 10.1037/h0026388 · DOI
  79. Schum, 1982, Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence, Law and Society Review, 17, 105, 10.2307/3053534 · DOI
  80. Shanteau, 1970, An additive model for sequential decision making, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 181, 10.1037/h0029552 · DOI
  81. Shanteau, 1972, Descriptive versus normative models of sequential inference judgment, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 63, 10.1037/h0032509 · DOI
  82. Slovic, 1971, Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649, 10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-X · DOI · Paper page
  83. Stewart, 1965, Effect of continuous responding on the order effect in personality impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 161, 10.1037/h0021641 · DOI
  84. Strange, 1978, Effects of the structure of descriptions on group impression formation, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 224, 10.3758/BF03329677 · doi:10.3758/bf03329677
  85. Tesser, 1968, Differential weighting and directed meaning as explanations of primacy in impression formation, Psychonomic Science, 11, 299, 10.3758/BF03328201 · DOI
  86. Tiwari, 1978, Primacy-recency effects in impression-formation as a function of dependence-independence proneness, Psychologia, 21, 143
  87. Tubbs, 1990, Recency effects in the auditor's belief revision process, The Accounting Review, 65, 452
  88. Tversky, 1988, Contingent weighting in judgment and choice, Psychological Review, 95, 371, 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Walker, 1972, Order of presentation at trial, Yale Law Journal, 82, 216, 10.2307/795112 · doi:10.2307/795112
  90. Weiss, 1969, Subjective averaging of length with serial presentation, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 52, 10.1037/h0028028 · DOI
  91. Yates, 1986, Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement, Acta Psychologica, 62, 293, 10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,588

Metadata

Authors
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J.
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-55
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979410064
Cited by
1,588
References
8
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j
The paper
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.