Cited by 180Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Sounds like a narcissist: Behavioral manifestations of narcissism in everyday life

Open access
Holtzman, Nicholas S., Vazire, Simine, Mehl, Matthias R.·2010·Journal of Research in Personality

Abstract

Little is known about narcissists' everyday behavior. The goal of this study was to describe how narcissism is manifested in everyday life. Using the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), we obtained naturalistic behavior from participants' everyday lives. The results suggest that the defining characteristics of narcissism that have been established from questionnaire and laboratory-based studies are borne out in narcissists' day-to-day behaviors. Narcissists do indeed behave in more extraverted and less agreeable ways than non-narcissists, skip class more (among narcissists high in exploitativeness/entitlement only), and use more sexual language. Furthermore, we found that the link between narcissism and disagreeable behavior is strengthened when controlling for self-esteem, thus extending prior questionnaire-based findings (Paulhus, Robins, Trzesniewski, & Tracy, 2004) to observed, real-world behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.001

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narcissists are often combative toward others and perceived as confrontational, insulting, belittling, and intimidating.

    “At the same time, narcissists are often combative toward others. In such instances, they are often perceived as confrontational, insulting, belittling, and intimidating (Holtzman, Vazire, & Mehl, 2010; Morf & Rhodewalt, 1993; Reijntjes et al., 2016).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Holtzman, Vazire, & Mehl, 2010

    The Results (Behavioral Correlates of Narcissism; page not provided) associate narcissism with disagreeable acts, including arguing, swear words, and anger words, supporting the description of combative behavior. The paper does not report that others perceived participants as confrontational, insulting, belittling, or intimidating. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Narcissists may lie, insult, bully, and retaliate with physical aggression toward those who obstructed their status pursuit.

    “Not only might they sometimes lie (Lee & Ashton, 2005), insult (Holtzman et al., 2010), and bully (Reijntjes et al., 2016), but they can also retaliate with physical aggression toward those that obstructed their status pursuit (for a review, see Denissen, Thomaes, & Bushman, 2018).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Holtzman et al., 2010

    Only “insult” is attributed to Holtzman et al. The Method (Disagreeable acts; page unavailable) describes arguing, yelling, and expressing anger toward another person, and the Results report an association between narcissism and a composite of arguing, swear words, and anger words. These support verbal hostility, but the paper does not specifically establish that participants insulted others; the other behaviors in the citing sentence have different citations. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holtzman, N. S., Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Holtzman, Nicholas S.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
478-484
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101528257
Cited by
180
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R03CA137975)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
narcissism, daily behavior, naturalistic behavior, extraversion, agreeableness, self-esteem, sexual language, class skipping, exploitativeness, entitlement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review