The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Leech, G. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315835976 · Cited by 7,767
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1985) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326517 · Cited by 5,377
Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 2,726
Biber, D. (1986) · Language · doi:10.2307/415483 · Cited by 1,941
A Festschrift for Morris Halle
Halle, M., Anderson, S. R., & Kiparsky, P. (1973) · Holt, Rinehart and Winston eBooks · Cited by 1,908
(1979) · Expression and Meaning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609213.004 · Cited by 1,393
Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)1
BLUM-KULKA, S., & OLSHTAIN, E. (1984) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/5.3.196 · Cited by 1,242 · cited 1×
“For details of the study see Blum-Kulka and Olshtain (1984), and Blum-Kulka, House and Kasper (forthcoming).”
MethodSelf-citationSearle, J. R. (1975) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_004 · Cited by 804
Is Sybil there? the structure of some American English directives
Ervin-Tripp, S. Μ. (1976) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500006849 · Cited by 764
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, in press. The multifunctionality of discourse markers: The case of requests. Theoretical Linguistics. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper, eds., forthcoming. Cross-cultural pragmatics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Dascal, 1983, Vol. 1
- Katriel Tamar, forthcoming. ‘Dugri’ speech: Talking straight in Israeli ‘Sabra’ culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 887
First order and second order indirectness in Korean and Chinese
Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2021) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.022 · Cited by 22
Mitigating strategies and politeness in German requests
Ackermann, T. (2023) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/pr-2021-0034 · Cited by 22
Requests and politeness in Vietnamese as a native language
Nguyen, T. T. M., & Ho, G. A. L. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.23.4.05ngu · Cited by 22
“The level of directness refers to the extent to which S (speaker)’s intent is made transparent (see Blum-Kulka 1987).”
BackgroundInfluentialIrony in and through follow-ups
Weizman, E. (2015) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.259.07wei · Cited by 22
Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back
Baider, F. H., Cislaru, G., & Claudel, C. (2020) · Corpus Pragmatics · doi:10.1007/s41701-020-00088-8 · Cited by 22
“At a more specific level of analysis, research questions on the functioning of speech acts may concern, in particular, the place given in statements to indirection (Blum-Kulka 1987), to supportive moves and/or to the internal modifiers they are composed of (Blum-Kulka et al.”
BackgroundThe interactive effects of request form and speaker status on judgments of requests
Becker, J. A., Kimmel, H. D., & Bevill, M. J. (1989) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01067314 · Cited by 22
“These findings reinforce the idea that the context in which language is used affects the way it is interpreted (Austin, 1975; Brown & Levinson, 1987; Ervin-Tripp, 1976; Haslett, 1987; McTear, 1980), particularly for requests ( Blum-Kulka, 1987; Holtgraves, 1986).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialChałupnik, M., & Atkins, S. (2020) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.014 · Cited by 22
“In the paper, the candidates who were evaluated well in their simulations and completed the station faster all used British English as their L1.”
BackgroundInfluentialSociopragmatic variation in Britain: A corpus-based study of politeness
van Dorst, I., Gillings, M., & Culpeper, J. (2024) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2024.04.009 · Cited by 21
Compliments in English and Persian interaction: A cross-cultural perspective
Karimnia, A., & Afghari, A. (2011) · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · Cited by 21
Edwards, A. P., & Harris, C. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.050 · Cited by 21
“In the case of FTAs, onlookers may appreciate an indirect, or off-record approach for its face-saving quality (see, e.g., Blum-Kulka, 1987; Holtgraves & Joong-Nam, 1990).”
BackgroundResultVergis, N., & Pell, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/pr-2017-0008 · Cited by 26
“Ultimately, “politeness is defined as the interactional balance achieved between two needs: The need for pragmatic clarity and the need to avoid coerciveness” (Blum-Kulka 1987: 1).”
BackgroundDiffering perceptions of face in British and Japanese academic settings
Hiraga, M., & Turner, J. (1996) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0388-0001(96)00037-x · Cited by 21
Analysing Health Communication
Chałupnik, M., & Atkins, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68184-5 · Cited by 27
GarcíaFuentes, C., & McDonough, K. (2018) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2016.1167232 · Cited by 20
“Although research has shed light on the use of politeness strategies for requests (Blum-Kulka 1987), apologies (Olshtain and Cohen 1983), and refusals (Beebe, Takahashi, and Uliss-Weltz 1990), less is known about the use of politeness strategies for disagreements.”
BackgroundTerkourafi, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108954105.004 · Cited by 20
“…more polite: the explicit guidance offered by the discourse marker in this case lessens the imposition on the listener’s cognitive resources (Blum-Kulka 1987) reducing costs, or, conversely, shows that the speaker is at least trying to be relevant (provide an answer to a previous question…”
BackgroundSupportive Discourse Moves in Persian Requests.
Nodoushan, M. A. S., & Allami, H. (2011) · Cited by 20
Academic Misconduct: A Goals–Plans–Action Approach to Peer Confrontation and Whistle-Blowing
Henningsen, M. L. M., Valde, K. S., & Denbow, J. (2013) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.752509 · Cited by 20
“, Blum-Kulka, 1987, Cody, Canary, & Smith, 1994; Dillard, Wilson, Tusing, & Kinney, 1997; Wiseman & Schenck-Hamlin, 1981). The activated goal structure of a situation should lead to planning; planning should predict the use of explicit messages. Complex, active goal structures should lead to care in the use of message…”
BackgroundInfluentialResolving the directness dilemma in document review sessions with nonnative speakers
Riley, K., & Mackiewicz, J. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2002.808352 · Cited by 20
“However, rather than ranking the forms from high to low clarity, Table II shows politeness judgments (based on experimental studies such as [23] and [ 40 ]) about the same forms.”
BackgroundOn the Applicability of Cultural Scripts in Teaching L2 Compliments
Karimnia, A., & Afghari, A. (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v3n3p71 · Cited by 19
“Indeed, speakers of a given culture have been shown to have mutually shared expectations about what the appropriate behavior and its social meanings are in different contexts (Blum-Kulka 1987).”
BackgroundRequest Strategies in Professional E-mail Correspondence: Insights from the United States Workplace
Leopold, L. (2015) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v32i2.1205 · Cited by 21
“What follows the head act is a supportive move (grounder), according to the classification scheme developed by Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper (1989).”
BackgroundMethodShafran, R. W. (2019) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.020 · Cited by 19
Ruytenbeek, N. (2019) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/pr-2017-0026 · Cited by 19
“The analysis of the structure and content of the emails was conducted in line with Blum-Kulka and Olshtain’s (1984) CCSARP coding scheme (Appendix 1), with the exception that, here, request forms were not classified according to “levels of (in)directness”.”
BackgroundInfluentialPoliteness Phenomena in British English and Uruguayan Spanish: The Case of Requests
Reiter, R. M. (1997) · Miscelánea A Journal of English and American Studies · doi:10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199711291 · Cited by 19
Mackiewicz, J. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2005.859727 · Cited by 19
“In other words, standard situations provide scripts that lend the pragmatic clarity needed to create a polite message, as Blum-Kulka postulated [6].”
BackgroundRegulatory talk and politeness at the family dinner table
Brumark, Å. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.16.2-3.06bru · Cited by 18
“Directness and politeness in adult-child communication The use of control acts by parents has been widely studied ever since the rise of interest in natural parent–child communications (Ervin-Tripp & Gordon 1986; Snow et al. 1990; Blum-Kulka 1987, 1990).”
BackgroundCiceroFam.5.8 andFam.15.5 in the Light of Modern Politeness Theory
Jon, H. (1996) · Antichthon · doi:10.1017/s006647740000099x · Cited by 18
Tact or frankness in English and Russian blind peer reviews
Larina, T. V., & Ponton, D. M. (2020) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/ip-2020-4004 · Cited by 18
Ruytenbeek, N. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108673112 · Cited by 20
Lee, J.-G., Lee, J., & Lee, D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106697 · Cited by 20
Understanding indirect requests for information in high-functioning autism
Marocchini, E., Paola, S. D., Mazzaggio, G., et al. (2021) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-021-01056-z · Cited by 18
“These non-conventionalized IRs are also usually referred to as highly indirect requests (HIRs) or hints (Blum-Kulka 1987; Clark 1979).”
BackgroundSpeech Acts in English: From Research to Instruction and Textbook Development
Hernández, L. P. (2020) · RIUR (Universidad de La Rioja) · Cited by 18
A process model of request tactic evaluation
Kim, M., & Bresnahan, M. (1994) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539409544898 · Cited by 18
Boundary conditions of the politeness effect in online mathematical learning
Mikheeva, M., Schneider, S., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.028 · Cited by 21
Bloch, L. (1998) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3102_2 · Cited by 18
Experiential and Physiological Responses to Interpersonal Influence
Dillard, J. P., & Kinney, T. A. (1994) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00333.x · Cited by 18
Duskaeva, L. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81747-3_1 · Cited by 17
Kranich, S., Hampel, E., & Bruns, H. (2020) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101271 · Cited by 17
Wang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00068-7 · Cited by 17
PRAGMATIC PHENOMENA CONSTELLATION IN SPECIFIC CULTURE DIMENSION LANGUAGE STUDY
Rahardi, R. K. (2017) · International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) · doi:10.24071/ijhs.2017.010109 · Cited by 17
Pressuring the President: Changing language practices and the growth of political accountability
Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. C. (2023) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.014 · Cited by 17
The facework of unfinished turns in French conversation
Chevalier, F. H. G. (2009) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445609102443 · Cited by 17
“Further, it has been shown that off-record forms are not necessarily the most polite forms (Blum-Kulka, 1987).”
BackgroundAddressing Agamemnon: A Pilot Study of Politeness and Pragmatics in the Iliad
Brown, H. P. (2006) · Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) · doi:10.1353/apa.2006.0004 · Cited by 17
Rater Behaviour When Judging Language Learners’ Pragmatic Appropriateness in Extended Discourse
Sydorenko, T., Maynard, C., & Guntly, E. (2015) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v32i1.1197 · Cited by 17
“Raters’ markings of appropriate and inappropriate strategies were compared to the Blum-Kulka et al. (1989) framework of direct, conventionally indirect, and nonconventionally indirect head acts, as well as mitigating and aggravating supportive moves.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe Effect of Request Form and Content on Constructing Obstacles to Compliance
Paulson, G. D., & Roloff, M. E. (1997) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365097024003003 · Cited by 17
Threatening in English: A Mixed Method Approach
Muschalik, J. (2018) · Cited by 17
A Textbook Evaluation of Speech Acts: The Case of English Result Series
Alemi, M., & Irandoost, R. (2012) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.199 · Cited by 16
Domakani, M. R., Hashemian, M., & Mansoori, S. (2013) · Journal of research in applied linguistic studies/Journal of research in applied linguistics · Cited by 15
The Politics of Person Reference
Truan, N. (2020) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.320 · Cited by 17
Saleem, A., Saleem, T., & Aziz, A. (2022) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-022-00134-9 · Cited by 16
Imperatives in voice-overs in British TV commercials: ‘Get this, buy that, taste the other’
Pennock-Speck, B., & Márquez, M. F. (2014) · Discourse & Communication · doi:10.1177/1750481314537578 · Cited by 16
Functions of Head and Body Movements in Austrian Sign Language
Lackner, A. (2017) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781501507779 · Cited by 16
Schrott, A. (2014) · Romanische Forschungen · doi:10.3196/003581214810860517 · Cited by 16
Requests across Varieties and Cultures
Kranich, S., Bruns, H., & Hampel, E. (2021) · Anglistik · doi:10.33675/angl/2021/1/9 · Cited by 15
Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts
Burnette, J., & Calude, A. S. (2022) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.002 · Cited by 15
Polite like an Egyptian? Case Studies of Politeness in the Late Ramesside Letters
Ridealgh, K. (2016) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/pr-2016-0007 · Cited by 15
Politeness in power-asymmetrical e-mail requests of Korean and American corporate employees
Kim, S. H., & Lee, H. (2017) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/ip-2017-0010 · Cited by 15
The confirmational marker ha in Northern Mandarin
Yang, X., & Wiltschko, M. E. (2016) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.004 · Cited by 15
Modal Expressions in Refusals of Friends' Interpersonal Requests: Politeness and Effectiveness
Johnson, D. I. (2008) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510970802062477 · Cited by 15
“Brown and Levinson (1987) defined positive face as the need to be approved by others; Lim and Bowers (1991) extended this definition to include both the desire to be seen as competent and to be liked.”
BackgroundInfluentialRue, Y.-J., Zhang, G. Q., & Shin, K. L. (2007) · eSpace (Curtin University) · Cited by 15
On the pragmatic development of modal particles in Navarrese-Lapurdian Basque
Monforte, S. (2020) · Studies in language companion series · doi:10.1075/slcs.219.02mon · Cited by 14
Pseudo-Directive Speech Act in the Javanese Language: Culture-Specific Pragmatic Perspective
Rahardi, R. K., Rahmat, W., & Kurniawan, Y. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00223 · Cited by 14
Balancing clarity and politeness in editing sessions with non-native speakers
Mackiewicz, J., & Riley, K. (2003) · IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) · doi:10.1109/ipcc.2002.1049125 · Cited by 14
“Interestingly, research on cross-cultural pragmatics has found that an utterance which requires the hearer to travel a long inferential path will actually be judged as less polite than one which expresses all or part of the proposition (Blum-Kulka, 1987; Brown & Levinson, 1987; Rinnert & Kobayashi, 1999).”
BackgroundMedical communication in L1 and L2 contexts: Comparative modification analysis
de Poel, K. V., & Brunfaut, T. (2010) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/iprg.2010.005 · Cited by 14
The study of refusals and pragmatic modifiers in jordanian arabic
Kayed, M. A., Alzu’bi, M. A., & Alkayid, M. (2020) · Acta Scientiarum Language and Culture · doi:10.4025/actascilangcult.v42i2.52543 · Cited by 14
“Pragmatic modifiers include two types: internal and external modifiers (Blum-Kulka, 1987). Internal pragmatic modifiers include the lexical and grammatical devices used inside the head act, while external pragmatic modifiers used outside the head act (Blum-Kulka et al., 1989). Classification of pragmatic modifiers was…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPragmatic transfer and development
Li, W. (2018) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.287 · Cited by 22
Relational Framing Theory: Utterance Form and Relational Context as Antecedents of Frame Salience
McLaren, R. M., Dillard, J. P., Tusing, K. J., et al. (2014) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2014.949387 · Cited by 14
“The oblique form was unconventionally indirect (Blum-Kulka, 1987): ‘‘We’re playing ping-pong in the den.”
BackgroundInfluentialEnglish Speech Act Realization of “Refusals” among Iranian EFL Learners
Sahragard, R., & Javanmardi, F. (2011) · Cross-cultural communication · doi:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110702.021 · Cited by 14
“According to Blum-Kulka (1987), implicitness and politeness have been considered to represent scalable parallel dimensions in the literature on politeness and explicitness.”
BackgroundDavies, C. E., & Arnold, J. E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.6 · Cited by 15
Comparison between Chinese and Japanese Social Media Requests
Ren, W., & Fukushima, S. (2020) · Contrastive Pragmatics · doi:10.1163/26660393-bja10017 · Cited by 14
Politeness, Time Constraints, and Collaboration in Decision-Making Meetings: A Case Study
Friess, E. (2011) · Technical Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10572252.2011.551507 · Cited by 14
“Leech ( 1983 ) and Blum-Kulka ( 1987 ) indicated similar findings in dyadic conversations.”
BackgroundNative speakers' assessment of (im)politeness of non-native speakers' requests
Mohammadi, M., & Sa’d, S. H. T. (2013) · International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning · doi:10.5861/ijrsll.2013.591 · Cited by 14
Resonancias discursivas y cortesía en prácticas de lecto-escritura
Serrani-Infante, S. M. (2001) · DELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada · doi:10.1590/s0102-44502001000100002 · Cited by 14
The issue of Selection of Objects of Analysis in Ethnographies of Speaking
Fitch, K. L. (1994) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2701_2 · Cited by 14
Perception and evaluation of requests on social media in Chinese and Japanese
Ren, W., & Fukushima, S. (2022) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2022.09.002 · Cited by 13
Hessels, R. S., Iwabuchi, T., Niehorster, D. C., Funawatari, R., Benjamins, J. S., Kawakami, S., Nyström, M., Suda, M., Hooge, I. T. C., Sumiya, M., et al. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106174 · Cited by 14
“If one considers politeness as a balance between the need for pragmatic clarity and the need to avoid coerciveness (as proposed by Blum-Kulka, 1987), it may be that pointing gestures are avoided more in Japan as a way to reduce coerciveness.”
Zayts, O. A., & Kang, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/jplr.2009.003 · Cited by 13
Prayitno, H. J., Ngalim, A., Sutopo, A., et al. (2018) · Humanus · doi:10.24036/humanus.v17i2.101371 · Cited by 13
“The meaning of speech is the pragmatics study (Akinwotu, 2015; Beaver, 2007; Blum-Kulka, 1987).”
BackgroundResultDesigning interactive, automated dialogues for L2 pragmatics learning
Timpe‐Laughlin, V., Evanini, K., Green, A., et al. (2017) · doi:10.21437/semdial.2017-13 · Cited by 13
“However, Blum-Kulka (1987) mediated Leech’s stance, arguing that in order to be polite every speaker has to strike a balance between pragmatic clarity and avoiding coerciveness.”
BackgroundZand-Moghadam, A., & Adeh, A. (2020) · Journal of Intercultural Communication Research · doi:10.1080/17475759.2019.1705876 · Cited by 14
“These speech acts have received a great deal of attention in cross-cultural pragmatics too (Blum-Kulka, 1987; Blum-Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989; Blum-Kulka & Olshtain, 1984; Otcu & Zeyrek, 2008; Rose & Ng, 2001).”
BackgroundTian, Y., & Breheny, R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.29 · Cited by 13
The Importance of Pragmatic Competence in the EFL Curriculum: Application and Implications*Preprint
Choraih, M. A., Loutfi, A., & Mansoor, A. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2895549 · Cited by 13
Aggressiveness and deference in Arabic broadcast interviews
Alfahad, A. (2015) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.009 · Cited by 12
López, M. H., & Placencia, M. E. (2004) · ELUA Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante · doi:10.14198/elua2004.18.07 · Cited by 12
“10 Críticas al modelo de Brown y Levinson (1987) en esta área se pueden encontrar en Blum-Kulka (1987) y Bravo (1999), entre otros.”
BackgroundCıfuentes, L., Eslami, Z. R., & Liu, C.-N. (2007) · Cited by 12
Children’s Production and Comprehension of Politeness in Requests
Pedlow, R., Wales, R. J., & Sanson, A. V. (2001) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x01020001002 · Cited by 12
“Regarding the direction of the effect for indirectness, Blum-Kulka (1987) argued that contrary to prior research in this area, indirectness does not parallel politeness.”
ResultContextualizing intercultural communication and sociopragmatic choices
Mei, L.-W. S. (2002) · Multilingua · doi:10.1515/mult.2002.005 · Cited by 12
Routine and Indirection in Interlanguage Pragmatics.
Kasper, G. (1995) · Cited by 12
Kim, M., & Bresnahan, M. (1996) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463379609370000 · Cited by 12
The representation of African humanism in the narrative writings of Es'kia Mphahlele
Rafapa, L. (2005) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 12
Saberi, K. (2012) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/4941 · Cited by 12
Self-compassion, mental health shame and work motivation in German and Japanese employees
Kotera, Y., Mayer, C., & Vanderheiden, E. (2022) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2022.2148829 · Cited by 13
“…German workplaces to some degree (Schomerus et al., 2012), in the individualistic, and relatively uncertainty tolerant culture of Germany, direct and honest communication, even when revealing a socially unfavourable matter, is preferred for its efficiency (Blum-Kulka, 1987; Hickey & Stewart, 2005).”
BackgroundHofweber, J. E., & Jaworska, S. (2022) · Journal of English as a Lingua Franca · doi:10.1515/jelf-2022-2085 · Cited by 11
RESEMBLANCE OF INDIRECTNESS IN POLITENESS OF EFL LEARNERS’ REQUEST REALIZATIONS
Syahri, I. (2013) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v3i1.197 · Cited by 11
“That is why Blum-Kulka (1992) considered ‘mood derivable’ as one of direct strategies.”
Managed confrontation and the managed heart: gendered teacher talk through reported speech
LeBlanc, R. J. (2018) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1441728 · Cited by 11
“Blum-Kulka (1987) and others have noted that indirectness is a key part of language use, allowing speakers to hedge, to deny claims later on, and to develop sociability with their interlocutors.”
BackgroundHow (not) to be rude: Facilitatingthe acquisition of L2 (im)politeness
Rieger, C. L. (2018) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/ip-2018-0023 · Cited by 11
Social Media in Emergent Brazil
Spyer, J. (2017) · UCL Press eBooks · doi:10.14324/111.9781787351653 · Cited by 11
The Effect of Instruction on the Development of Pragmatic Competence
Salehi, M. (2013) · CPS International Journal of Social Science Research · doi:10.14239/ijssr.2013.01203 · Cited by 11
Transferability of L1 Indirect Request Strategies to L2 Contexts.
Takahashi, S. (1993) · Cited by 11
Demeure, V., Bonnefon, J., & Raufaste, É. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.4.873 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Blum-Kulka, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-146
- ISSN
- 0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974543382
- Cited by
- 891
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 29.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pragmatics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- indirectness, politeness, requests, politeness theory, coerciveness, face, hints, Hebrew language, English language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review