Cited by 165biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Degradation mechanisms of bioresorbable polyesters. Part 1. Effects of random scission, end scission and autocatalysis

Open access
Gleadall, Andrew, Pan, Jingzhe, Kruft, Marc-Anton, Kellomäki, Minna·2014·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

A mathematical model was developed to relate the degradation trend of bioresorbable polymers to different underlying hydrolysis mechanisms, including noncatalytic random scission, autocatalytic random scission, noncatalytic end scission or autocatalytic end scission. The effect of each mechanism on molecular weight degradation and potential mass loss was analysed. A simple scheme was developed to identify the most likely hydrolysis mechanism based on experimental data. The scheme was first demonstrated using case studies, then used to evaluate data collected from 31 publications in the literature to identify the dominant hydrolysis mechanisms for typical biodegradable polymers. The analysis showed that most of the experimental data indicates autocatalytic hydrolysis, as expected. However, the study shows that the existing understanding on whether random or end scission controls degradation is inappropriate. It was revealed that pure end scission cannot explain the observed trend in molecular weight reduction because end scission would be too slow to reduce the average molecular weight. On the other hand, pure random scission cannot explain the observed trend in mass loss because too few oligomers would be available to diffuse out of a device. It is concluded that the chain ends are more susceptible to cleavage, which produces most of the oligomers leading to mass loss. However, it is random scission that dominates the reduction in molecular weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.039

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SEM voids may correspond to areas where significant auto-catalysis has occurred, resulting in pockets of low molecular weight oligomers that diffuse slowly out through the polymer matrix.

    “This is consistent with SEM observations, where the voids seen may correspond to areas where significant auto-catalysis has occurred, resulting in pockets of low molecular weight oligomers which diffuse slowly out through the polymer matrix [21, 47].”

    From Tuning structural relaxations, mechanical properties, and degradation timescale of PLLA during hydrolytic degradation by blending with PLCL-PEG (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links faster degradation in the cores of large samples to oligomers and monomers acting as catalysts, and Section 3 says these water-soluble chains may diffuse out of a device. The paper does not identify SEM voids as sites of autocatalysis or describe them as pockets of oligomers that diffuse slowly through the polymer matrix. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The accelerated degradation of the blend is attributable to auto-catalytic behaviour: faster degrading PLCL-PEG breaks down, accumulating catalytic oligomers formed by hydrolysis, which then catalyse degradation of PLLA and further degradation of PLCL-PEG.

    “This can be attributed to auto-catalytic behaviour [47, 48] - as the faster degrading PLCL-PEG breaks down, there is an accumulation of catalytic oligomers formed by hydrolysis, which then catalyse degradation of PLLA as well as further degradation of PLCL-PEG.”

    From Tuning structural relaxations, mechanical properties, and degradation timescale of PLLA during hydrolytic degradation by blending with PLCL-PEG (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The hydrolytic degradation rate of LA/CL copolymers is strongly influenced by composition and increases with increasing LA amount and degree of randomness.

    “the hydrolytic degradation rate of the copolymers of LA and CL is strongly influenced by the composition, as a consequence of the degree of crystallinity and the hydrophobicity. It was found that the degradation rate increase by increasing the LA amount and by the degree of randomness in the case of CL/LA copolymers [21].”

    From Thermo-Rheological and Shape Memory Properties of Block and Random Copolymers of Lactide and ε-Caprolactone (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

    Table 2 (Conclusions; page unavailable) includes a 90PLA:10PCL sample, but does not compare LA/CL compositions or their degradation rates. The discussion of random scission in §3.1 concerns where polymer chains break, not the degree of randomness of a copolymer. Searches for LA content, copolymer randomness, crystallinity, and hydrophobicity found no passage establishing the claimed trend. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Siparsky GL, Voorhees KJ, Miao F. Hydrolysis of polylactic acid (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) in aqueous acetonitrile solutions: Autocatalysis. Journal of Environmental Polymer Degradation 1998;6:31-41.
  2. Yoon J-S, Jung H-W, Kim M-N, Park E-S. Diffusion coefficient and equilibrium solubility of water molecules in biodegradable polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2000;77:1716-22.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gleadall, A., Pan, J., Kruft, M.-A., & Kellomäki, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Pan, Jingzhe
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
2223-2232
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030708200
Cited by
165
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
biodegradable polymers, hydrolysis mechanism, random chain scission, autocatalytic hydrolysis, molecular weight degradation, mass loss, mathematical model
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Catalysis, Computer Simulation, Hydrolysis, Models, Theoretical, Molecular Weight, Polyesters, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review