Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A biomimetic triple-layered biocomposite with effective multifunction for dura repair

Liao, Jie, Li, Xiaoming, He, Wei, Guo, Qi, Fan, Yubo·2021·Acta Biomaterialia
DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. Cosgrove, 2007, Safety and efficacy of a novel polyethylene glycol hydrogel sealant for watertight dural repair, J. Neurosurg., 106, 52, 10.3171/jns.2007.106.1.52 · DOI · Paper page
  2. MacManus, 2017, Protection of cortex by overlying meninges tissue during dynamic indentation of the adolescent brain, Acta Biomater., 57, 384, 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.022 · DOI
  3. Bylski, 1983, Mechanical behavior of fetal dura mater under large axisymmetric inflation, J. Biomech. Eng., 105, 71, 10.1115/1.3138388 · doi:10.1115/1.3138388
  4. van Noort, 1981, A study of the uniaxial mechanical properties of human dura mater preserved in glycerol, Biomaterials, 2, 41, 10.1016/0142-9612(81)90086-7 · DOI
  5. Wilcox, 2003, Mathematical model for the viscoelastic properties of dura mater, J. Orthop. Sci., 8, 432, 10.1007/s10776-003-0644-9 · doi:10.1007/s10776-003-0644-9
  6. Narotam, 2004, Collagen matrix (DuraGen) in dural repair: analysis of a new modified technique, Spine, 29, 2861, 10.1097/01.brs.0000148049.69541.ad · DOI · Paper page
  7. Thavarajah, 2010, Postoperative cervical cord com pression induced by hydrogel (DuraSeal): a possible complication, Spine, 35, 25, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9fc45 · DOI
  8. Epstein, 2010, Dural repair with four spinal sealants: focused review of the manufacturers' inserts and the current literature, Spine J., 10, 1065, 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.017 · DOI
  9. Kinaci, 2019, Dural sealants for the management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after intradural surgery: current status and future perspectives, Expert Rev. Med. Devices, 16, 549, 10.1080/17434440.2019.1626232 · DOI
  10. Thammavaran, 1990, Fascia lata graft as dural substitute in neurosurgery, South. Med J., 83, 634, 10.1097/00007611-199006000-00009 · doi:10.1097/00007611-199006000-00009
  11. Sun, 2018, Large retrospective study of artificial dura substitute in patients with traumatic brain injury undergo decompressive craniectomy, Brain Behav., 8, 7, 10.1002/brb3.907 · DOI
  12. Turchan, 2018, Duraplasty using amniotic membrane versus temporal muscle fascia: a clinical comparative study, J. Clin. Neurosci., 50, 272, 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.069 · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.069
  13. He, 2017, Efficacy and safety of small intestinal submucosa in dural defect repair in a canine model, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 73, 267, 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.077 · DOI
  14. Islam, 2004, Usefulness of acellular dermal graft as a dural substitute in experimental model, Surg. Neurol., 61, 297, 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00380-X · doi:10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00380-x
  15. Vinas, 1999, Evaluation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) versus polydioxanone (PDS) for repair of dura mater defects, Neurol. Res., 21, 262, 10.1080/01616412.1999.11740929 · doi:10.1080/01616412.1999.11740929
  16. Wang, 2013, Multilayer scaffold of electrospun PLA-PCL-collagen nanofibers as a dural substitute, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, 101, 1359, 10.1002/jbm.b.32953 · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32953
  17. Hu, 2017, Development of collagen/polydopamine complexed matrix as mechanically enhanced and highly biocompatible semi-natural tissue engineering scaffold, Acta Biomater., 47, 135, 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.017 · DOI
  18. Flanagan, 2015, Development of a sutureless dural substitute from Bombyx mori silk fibroin, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, 103, 485, 10.1002/jbm.b.33217 · DOI
  19. Nunamaker, 2011, Investigation of the material properties of alginate for the development of hydrogel repair of dura mater, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 4, 16, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.08.006 · DOI
  20. Hemstapat, 2020, Performance evaluation of bilayer oxidized regenerated cellulose/poly ε-caprolactone knitted fabric-reinforced composites for dural substitution, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med., 234, 854, 10.1177/0954411920926071 · doi:10.1177/0954411920926071
  21. Bhatia, 1995, Synthetic dural prothesis constructed from hydroxyethylmethacrylate hydrogels, J. Neurosurg., 83, 897, 10.3171/jns.1995.83.5.0897 · doi:10.3171/jns.1995.83.5.0897
  22. Bi, 2020, Applications of materials for dural reconstruction in pre-clinical and clinical studies: advantages and drawbacks, efficacy, and selections, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 117, 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111326 · DOI
  23. Xu, 2017, Hierarchical micro/nanofibrous bioscaffolds for structural tissue regeneration, Adv. Healthc Mater., 6, 15, 10.1002/adhm.201601457 · DOI
  24. Xie, 2010, Radially aligned, electrospun nanofibers as dural substitutes for wound closure and tissue regeneration applications, ACS Nano, 4, 5027, 10.1021/nn101554u · DOI · Paper page
  25. Shi, 2015, Fabrication and evaluation of a homogeneous electrospun PCL-gelatin hybrid membrane as an anti-adhesion barrier for craniectomy, J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 4063, 10.1039/C5TB00261C · DOI
  26. Chen, 2017, Methotrexate prevents epidural fibrosis through endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling pathway, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 796, 131, 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.12.032 · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.12.032
  27. Gonzalez-Lopez, 2015, Efficacy of placing a thin layer of gelatin sponge over the subdural space during dural closure in preventing meningo-cerebral adhesion, World Neurosurg., 83, 93, 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.02.032 · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.02.032
  28. Ito, 2013, Comparative study of fibrin and chemical synthetic sealant on dural regeneration and brain damage, J. Neurosurg., 19, 736
  29. Deng, 2017, A novel biomimetic composite substitute of PLLA/gelatin nanofiber membrane for dura repairing, Neurol. Res., 39, 819, 10.1080/01616412.2017.1348680 · doi:10.1080/01616412.2017.1348680
  30. Shi, 2016, A new absorbable synthetic substitute with biomimetic design for dural tissue repair, Artif. Organs, 40, 403, 10.1111/aor.12568 · doi:10.1111/aor.12568
  31. Li, 2017, The importance of nonlinear tissue modelling in finite element simulations of infant head impacts, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 16, 823, 10.1007/s10237-016-0855-5 · doi:10.1007/s10237-016-0855-5
  32. Chauvet, 2010, Histological and biomechanical study of dura mater applied to the technique of dura splitting decompression in Chiari type I malformation, Neurosurg. Rev., 33, 287, 10.1007/s10143-010-0261-x · doi:10.1007/s10143-010-0261-x
  33. Sung, 1999, In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 10, 63, 10.1163/156856299X00289 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Cui, 2014, Preparation and characterization of IPN hydrogels composed of chitosan and gelatin cross-linked by genipin, Carbohyd. Polym., 99, 31, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.048 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Butler, 2003, Mechanism and kinetics of the crosslinking reaction between biopolymers containing primary amine groups and genipin, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem., 41, 3941, 10.1002/pola.10960 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Chiono, 2008, Genipin-crosslinked chitosan/gelatin blends for biomedical applications, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 19, 889, 10.1007/s10856-007-3212-5 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Cao, 2020, Biomimetic SIS-based biocomposites with improved biodegradability, antibacterial activity and angiogenesis for abdominal wall repair, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 109, 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110538 · DOI
  38. Pal, 2020, Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based dual-crosslinking biohybrid injectable hydrogels for vascularization, Acta Biomater., 107, 138, 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.041 · DOI
  39. Protasoni, 2011, The collagenic architecture of human dura mater, J. Neurosurg., 114, 1723, 10.3171/2010.12.JNS101732 · DOI
  40. Xu, 2017, Polylactic acid nanofiber scaffold decorated with chitosan islandlike topography for bone tissue engineering, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 21094, 10.1021/acsami.7b01176 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Hou, 2020, Polysaccharide-peptide cryogels for multidrug-resistant-bacteria infected wound healing and hemostasis, Adv. Healthc Mater., 9, 10.1002/adhm.201901041 · DOI
  42. Zhao, 2016, Photocrosslinkable gelatin hydrogel for epidermal tissue engineering, Adv. Healthc Mater., 5, 108, 10.1002/adhm.201500005 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Yokoyama, 2012, Evaluation of the protective effects of cyclosporin A and FK506 on abnormal cytosolic and mitochondrial Ca2+ dynamics during ischemia and exposure to high glutamate concentration in mouse brain slice preparations, J. Pharmacol. Sci., 120, 228, 10.1254/jphs.12145FP · doi:10.1254/jphs.12145fp
  44. Milhorat, 2004, Possible harmful effects on central nervous system cells in the use of physiological saline as an irrigant during neurosurgical procedures, Surg. Neurol., 62, 96, 10.1016/j.surneu.2003.12.014 · doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2003.12.014
  45. Gu, 2012, The influence of heterogeneous meninges on the brain mechanics under primary blast loading, Compos. Part B Eng., 43, 3160, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.014 · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.014
  46. Zwirner, 2019, Mechanical properties of human dura mater in tension-an analysis at an age range of 2 to 94 years, Sci. Rep., 9, 16655, 10.1038/s41598-019-52836-9 · DOI
  47. Kyle Kurpinski, 2011, Dura mater regeneration with a novel synthetic, bilayered nanofibrous dural substitute: an experimental study, Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., 6, 325
  48. Vasilios, 2007, Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, 83, 580
  49. Chen, 2013, Biodegradable electrospun PLLA/chitosan membrane as guided tissue regeneration membrane for treating periodontitis, J. Mater. Sci., 48, 6567, 10.1007/s10853-013-7453-z · DOI
  50. Shi, 2016, Correction: fabrication and evaluation of a homogeneous electrospun PCL–gelatin hybrid membrane as an anti-adhesion barrier for craniectomy, J. Mater. Chem. B, 4, 348, 10.1039/C5TB90174J · DOI
  51. Qu, 2018, Injectable antibacterial conductive hydrogels with dual response to an electric field and pH for localized “smart” drug release, Acta Biomater., 72, 55, 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.018 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Spector, 2002, Dura mater biology: autocrine and paracrine effects of fibroblast growth factor 2, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 109, 645, 10.1097/00006534-200202000-00035 · DOI
  53. Bi, 2020, The effects of silk layer-by-layer surface modification on the mechanical and structural retention of extracellular matrix scaffold, Biomater. Sci., 8, 4026, 10.1039/D0BM00448K · DOI
  54. Yang, 2020, Konjac glucomannan/polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers with enhanced skin healing properties by improving fibrinogen adsorption, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 110, 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110718 · DOI
  55. Cheng, 2006, Near-Infrared fluorescent deoxyglucose analogue for tumor optical imaging in cell culture and living mice, Bioconjug. Chem., 17, 662, 10.1021/bc050345c · doi:10.1021/bc050345c
  56. Takanari, 2017, Skeletal muscle derived stem cells microintegrated into a biodegradable elastomer for reconstruction of the abdominal wall, Biomaterials, 113, 31, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.029 · DOI
  57. Taravel, 1993, Relation between the physicochemical characteristics of collagen and its interactions with chitosan: I, Biomaterials, 14, 930, 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90135-O · DOI
  58. Wu, 2019, Clinical evaluation and the establishment of quality control standards for dural repair materials, China Med. Devices, 34, 177
  59. Keisuke Yamada, 1997, Development of a dural substitute from synthetic bioabsorbabe polymers, J. Neurosurg., 86, 1012, 10.3171/jns.1997.86.6.1012 · doi:10.3171/jns.1997.86.6.1012
  60. Fang Wu, 2014, Antibiotic-loaded chitosan hydrogel with superior dual functions: antibacterial efficacy and osteoblastic cell responses, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6, 10005, 10.1021/am502537k · DOI
  61. Liao, 2020, Applications of decellularized materials in tissue engineering: advantages, drawbacks and current improvements, and future perspectives, J. Mater. Chem. B, 8, 10023, 10.1039/D0TB01534B · DOI
  62. Dziki, 2017, Solubilized extracellular matrix bioscaffolds derived from diverse source tissues differentially influence macrophage phenotype, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 105, 138, 10.1002/jbm.a.35894 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Suwanprateeb, 2016, Bilayer oxidized regenerated cellulose/poly ε-caprolactone knitted fabric-reinforced composite for use as an artificial dural substitute, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 27, 122, 10.1007/s10856-016-5736-z · DOI
  64. Sacks, 1998, Local mechanical anisotropy in human cranial dura mater allografts, J. Biomech. Eng., 120, 541, 10.1115/1.2798027 · doi:10.1115/1.2798027
  65. McGarvey, 1984, Mechanical suitability of glycerol-preserved human dura mater for construction of prosthetic cardiac valves, Biomaterials, 5, 109, 10.1016/0142-9612(84)90011-5 · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(84)90011-5
  66. Hirotaka Ito, 2011, Reinforcement of pericranium as a dural substitute by fibrin sealant, Acta Neurochir., 153, 2251, 10.1007/s00701-011-1077-3 · doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1077-3
  67. Agarwal, 1997, Histopathological changes following the use of biological and synthetic glue for dural grafts: an experimental study, Brit. J. Neurosurg., 12, 213, 10.1080/02688699845014 · doi:10.1080/02688699845014
  68. Michael, 2000, Convulsive seizures followin subdural application of fibrin sealant containing tranexamic acid in a rat model, Neurosurgery, 47, 1463, 10.1097/00006123-200012000-00048 · doi:10.1097/00006123-200012000-00048
  69. Matsumoto, 2013, Histological examination of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene artificial dura mater at 14 years after craniotomy, Neurol. Med. Chir., 53, 43, 10.2176/nmc.53.43 · doi:10.2176/nmc.53.43
  70. Sandoval-Sánchez, 2012, A new bilayer chitosan scaffolding as a dural substitute: experimental evaluation, World Neurosurg., 77, 577, 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.007 · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.007
  71. Mukai, 2008, Development of watertight and bioabsorbable synthetic dural substitutes, Artif. Organs, 32, 473, 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00567.x · DOI
  72. Trejo, 1997, Effects of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and polylactic acid barriers on healthy sites, J. Periodontol., 69, 14, 10.1902/jop.1998.69.1.14 · doi:10.1902/jop.1998.69.1.14
  73. Xue, 2014, Drug loaded homogeneous electrospun PCL/gelatin hybrid nanofiber structures for anti-infective tissue regeneration membranes, Biomaterials, 35, 9395, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.060 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Wu, 2017, Advances in biomaterials for preventing tissue adhesion, J. Control Release, 261, 318, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.020 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Li, 2002, Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 60, 613, 10.1002/jbm.10167 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Griessenauer, 2015, Epidural bovine pericardium facilitates dissection during cranioplasty: a technical note, World Neurosurg., 84, 2059, 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.009 · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.009
  77. Maolin, 1995, The difference between prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells, Biol. Teach. (Chinese), 20, 1
  78. Xuan, 2020, Freestanding hyaluronic acid/silk-based self-healing coating toward tissue repair with antibacterial surface, Appl. Bio. Mater., 3, 1628, 10.1021/acsabm.9b01196 · doi:10.1021/acsabm.9b01196
  79. Homaeigohar, 2020, Antibacterial biohybrid nanofibers for wound dressings, Acta Biomater., 107, 25, 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.022 · DOI · Paper page
  80. No, 2002, Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan oligomers with different molecular weights, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 74, 65, 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00717-6 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Dumont, 2017, Processing and antibacterial properties of chitosan-coated alginate fibers, Carbohyd. Polym., 190, 31, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.088 · DOI
  82. Liu, 2007, Application of scaffold materials in tissue reconstruction in immunocompetent mammals: our experience and future requirements, Biomaterials, 28, 5078, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.028 · DOI
  83. Shen, 2019, Electrospun acid-neutralizing fibers for the amelioration of inflammatory response, Acta Biomater., 97, 200, 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Li, 2005, Porous poly-l-lactic acid scaffold reinforced by chitin fibers, Polym. Bull., 54, 47, 10.1007/s00289-005-0364-7 · DOI
  85. Stachowiak, 2005, Bioactive hydrogels with an ordered cellular structure combine interconnected macroporosity and robust mechanical properties, Adv. Mater., 17, 399, 10.1002/adma.200400507 · DOI
  86. Lévesque, 2005, Macroporous interconnected dextran scaffolds of controlled porosity for tissue-engineering applications, Biomaterials, 26, 7436, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.054 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Chiu, 2011, The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels, Biomaterials, 32, 6045, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.066 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Griffin, 2015, Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks, Nat. Mater., 14, 737, 10.1038/nmat4294 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Maikos, 2008, Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord, J. Neurotrauma, 25, 38, 10.1089/neu.2007.0348 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Hamann, 1998, Quantification of the collagen fibre architecture of human cranial dura mater, J. Anat., 192, 99, 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19210099.x · doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19210099.x

Cited by

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Liao, J., Li, X., He, W., Guo, Q., & Fan, Y.
ORCID
He, Wei
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
130
Pages
248-267
ISSN
1742-7061
DOI
10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.003
Cited by
45
References
1
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11827803, 31771042, U20A20390)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
  • Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (141039)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1104703)
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (B13003)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A biomimetic triple-layered biocomposite with effective multifunction for dura repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.003
The paper
Liao, J., Li, X., He, W., Guo, Q., & Fan, Y. (2021). A biomimetic triple-layered biocomposite with effective multifunction for dura repair. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.