Cited by 251Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Introgression of Neandertal- and Denisovan-like Haplotypes Contributes to Adaptive Variation in Human Toll-like Receptors

Open access
Dannemann, Michael, Andrés, Aida M., Kelso, Janet·2016·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Pathogens and the diseases they cause have been among the most important selective forces experienced by humans during their evolutionary history. Although adaptive alleles generally arise by mutation, introgression can also be a valuable source of beneficial alleles. Archaic humans, who lived in Europe and Western Asia for more than 200,000 years, were probably well adapted to this environment and its local pathogens. It is therefore conceivable that modern humans entering Europe and Western Asia who admixed with them obtained a substantial immune advantage from the introgression of archaic alleles. Here we document a cluster of three Toll-like receptors (TLR6-TLR1-TLR10) in modern humans that carries three distinct archaic haplotypes, indicating repeated introgression from archaic humans. Two of these haplotypes are most similar to the Neandertal genome, and the third haplotype is most similar to the Denisovan genome. The Toll-like receptors are key components of innate immunity and provide an important first line of immune defense against bacteria, fungi, and parasites. The unusually high allele frequencies and unexpected levels of population differentiation indicate that there has been local positive selection on multiple haplotypes at this locus. We show that the introgressed alleles have clear functional effects in modern humans; archaic-like alleles underlie differences in the expression of the TLR genes and are associated with increased [corrected] microbial resistance and increased allergic disease in large cohorts. This provides strong evidence for recurrent adaptive introgression at the TLR6-TLR1-TLR10 locus, resulting in differences in disease phenotypes in modern humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.015

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some archaic alleles have been shown to confer an adaptive advantage for modern humans.

    “Some archaic alleles have been shown to confer an adaptive advantage for modern humans”
  • A number of instances of adaptive introgression have been described, generally affecting systems that influence immune and metabolic phenotypes.

    “a number of instances of adaptive introgression have been described, generally affecting systems that influence immune and metabolic phenotypes [1, 5, 10, 22, 40, 41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dannemann, M., Andrés, A. M., & Kelso, J.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Kelso, Janet
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
22-33
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2226561648
Cited by
249
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 2
FWCI
137.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2016-02-04)
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1052, project A02)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
adaptive introgression, Neanderthals, Denisovans, Toll-like receptors, archaic human admixture, positive selection, innate immunity, microbial resistance, allergic diseases, gene expression, allele frequency, genetic differentiation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Cell Line, Haplotypes, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Toll-Like Receptors, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review