Cited by 211Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Limits of long-term selection against Neandertal introgression

Open access
Petr, Martin, Pääbo, Svante, Kelso, Janet, Vernot, Benjamin·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Several studies have suggested that introgressed Neandertal DNA was subjected to negative selection in modern humans. A striking observation in support of this is an apparent monotonic decline in Neandertal ancestry observed in modern humans in Europe over the past 45,000 years. Here, we show that this decline is an artifact likely caused by gene flow between modern human populations, which is not taken into account by statistics previously used to estimate Neandertal ancestry. When we apply a statistic that avoids assumptions about modern human demography by taking advantage of two high-coverage Neandertal genomes, we find no evidence for a change in Neandertal ancestry in Europe over the past 45,000 years. We use whole-genome simulations of selection and introgression to investigate a wide range of model parameters and find that negative selection is not expected to cause a significant long-term decline in genome-wide Neandertal ancestry. Nevertheless, these models recapitulate previously observed signals of selection against Neandertal alleles, in particular the depletion of Neandertal ancestry in conserved genomic regions. Surprisingly, we find that this depletion is strongest in regulatory and conserved noncoding regions and in the most conserved portion of protein-coding sequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1814338116

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observations are consistent with NIMs having been primarily under purifying selection for thousands of generations.

    “Our observations are consistent with NIMs having been primarily under purifying selection for thousands of generations (Harris and Nielsen, 2016; Petr et al., 2019).”

    From The lingering effects of Neanderthal introgression on human complex traits (2023) · cites this paper as Petr et al., 2019

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports purifying selection against introgressed deleterious variants and continued, increasingly slow removal of selected variants. But it finds the strongest effect on Neandertal ancestry in the first few hundred generations and no significant long-term genome-wide decline. It therefore does not support describing NIMs broadly as primarily under purifying selection for thousands of generations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neanderthal ancestry is depleted in regions of the genome with strong background selection and evolutionary conservation.

    “First, Neanderthal ancestry is depleted in regions of the genome with strong background selection and evolutionary conservation18,19,27.”

    From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section, “Neandertal DNA Is Depleted in Regulatory and Conserved Noncoding Sequence” (page unavailable), reports significantly less Neandertal ancestry in conserved phastCons regions than in intronic and intergenic regions. It mentions earlier studies using B values, but our copy does not establish depletion specifically in regions of strong background selection. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neanderthal ancestry is depleted in regions of the genome with annotated molecular functions, and this depletion is strongest in annotated brain and testis regulatory regions.

    “Second, Neanderthal ancestry is depleted in regions of the genome with annotated molecular functions (e.g., genes and gene regulatory elements), and this depletion is strongest in annotated brain and testis regulatory regions27–29.”

    From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section, “Neandertal DNA Is Depleted in Regulatory and Conserved Noncoding Sequence” (page unavailable), reports significant depletion in promoters and conserved regions. It reports no significant depletion in protein-coding sequence relative to intronic and intergenic regions, and does not identify brain or testis regulatory regions as having the strongest depletion. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies of regions with Neanderthal ancestry found depletion for evidence of background selection and functional annotations, such as genes and gene regulatory elements active in specific tissues.

    “First, previous studies of regions with Neanderthal ancestry found depletion for evidence of background selection and functional annotations, such as genes and gene regulatory elements active in specific tissues18,19,27,29.”

    From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section, “Neandertal DNA Is Depleted in Regulatory and Conserved Noncoding Sequence” (page unavailable), reports previous findings of depletion in conserved and genic regions and this paper’s finding of depletion in promoters and conserved regions. It also says previous studies used B values, a measure of evolutionary conservation. Our copy does not establish depletion specifically in tissue-active regulatory elements or clearly report depletion by evidence of background selection. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Introgressed archaic DNA has mainly been deleterious and actively removed from coding sequences and conserved non-coding elements.

    “beyond general agreement that introgressed archaic DNA has mainly been deleterious and actively removed from coding sequences and conserved non-coding elements [8, 12–14]”

    From Denisovan introgression has shaped the immune system of present-day Papuans (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results section, “Neandertal DNA Is Depleted in Regulatory and Conserved Noncoding Sequence” (page not provided), reports strong depletion in promoters and conserved regions, supporting selection against introgression there. But it finds no significant depletion in coding sequence relative to intronic and intergenic regions. The Abstract describes some Neandertal alleles as potentially deleterious, not introgressed archaic DNA as mainly deleterious. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petr, M., Pääbo, S., Kelso, J., & Vernot, B.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Kelso, Janet
  • Vernot, Benjamin
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-01-15
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
1639-1644
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2952933500
Cited by
211
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 3
FWCI
167.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • H2020 European Research Council (694707)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
negative selection, gene flow, conserved genomic regions, regulatory elements, non-coding regions, protein-coding sequences
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, DNA, Europe, Humans, Selection, Genetic, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, RNA, Untranslated, White People, Gene Flow, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review