Cited by 181Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Archaic Hominin Admixture Facilitated Adaptation to Out-of-Africa Environments

Open access
Gittelman, Rachel M., Schraiber, Joshua G., Vernot, Benjamin, Mikacenic, Carmen, Wurfel, Mark M., Akey, Joshua M.·2016·Current Biology

Abstract

As modern humans dispersed from Africa throughout the world, they encountered and interbred with archaic hominins, including Neanderthals and Denisovans [1, 2]. Although genome-scale maps of introgressed sequences have been constructed [3-6], considerable gaps in knowledge remain about the functional, phenotypic, and evolutionary significance of archaic hominin DNA that persists in present-day individuals. Here, we describe a comprehensive set of analyses that identified 126 high-frequency archaic haplotypes as putative targets of adaptive introgression in geographically diverse populations. These loci are enriched for immune-related genes (such as OAS1/2/3, TLR1/6/10, and TNFAIP3) and also encompass genes (including OCA2 and BNC2) that influence skin pigmentation phenotypes. Furthermore, we leveraged existing and novel large-scale gene expression datasets to show many positively selected archaic haplotypes act as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), suggesting that modulation of transcript abundance was a common mechanism facilitating adaptive introgression. Our results demonstrate that hybridization between modern and archaic hominins provided an important reservoir of advantageous alleles that enabled adaptation to out-of-Africa environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.041

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The regions of the novel T2T-CHM13 haplotypes included previously recognized targets of adaptive introgression, such as SGCB and SPATA18.

    “These regions included previously recognized targets of adaptive introgression, such as SGCB and SPATA18 [13, 14, 17].”

    From A refined analysis of Neanderthal-introgressed sequences in modern humans with a complete reference genome (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results and Discussion section on identifying adaptively introgressed loci says that seven high-frequency archaic haplotypes had previously been highlighted as putative targets of adaptive introgression. Our copy does not identify SGCB or SPATA18 as examples, and it does not address the novel T2T-CHM13 haplotypes (searched: SGCB, SPATA18). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some archaic alleles and haplotypes are adaptive and persist at high frequencies in human populations.

    “For instance, substantial evidence suggests that some archaic alleles and haplotypes are adaptive and persist at high frequencies in human populations [10, 13–19].”
  • The introgressed variants that remain in AMH genomes are the result of complex selective and demographic pressures following admixture.

    “The introgressed variants that remain in AMH genomes are the result of complex selective and demographic pressures following admixture9,25,27.”
  • Some remaining Neandertal variants have reached high frequencies in some present-day populations, suggesting they might have conferred advantages at some point since admixture.

    “Some of the remaining Neandertal variants have reached high frequencies in some present-day populations, suggesting that they might have conferred advantages at some point since admixture [12, 18, 19].”
  • Selected variants can exert their effect by modifying gene expression or by changing the amino acid sequence.

    “Selected variants can exert their effect by modifying gene expression or by changing the amino acid sequence [8–12].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gittelman, R. M., Schraiber, J. G., Vernot, B., Mikacenic, C., Wurfel, M. M., & Akey, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Akey, Joshua M.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
26
Issue
24
Pages
3375-3382
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550871030
Cited by
181
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10
FWCI
65.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (R01GM110068)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
adaptive introgression, Neanderthal DNA, Denisovan DNA, immune-related genes, A20, OCA2, BNC2, expression quantitative trait loci, positive selection, hybridization
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Demography, DNA, Biological Evolution, Gene Expression Regulation, Haplotypes, Humans, Pigmentation, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review