Cited by 106Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Factual sources of psychiatric patients’ perceptions of coercion in the hospital admission process

Lidz, Charles W., Mulvey, Edward P., Hoge, Steven K., Kirsch, Brenda L., Monahan, John, Eisenberg, Marlene, Gardner, William, Roth, Loren H.·1998·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine what predicts patients' perceptions of coercion surrounding admission to a psychiatric hospital. METHOD: For 171 cases, the authors integrated data from interviews with patients, admitting clinicians, and other individuals involved in the patients' psychiatric admissions with data from the medical records. Using a structured set of procedures, coders determined whether or not nine coercion-related behaviors occurred around the time of admission. Correlation and regression analyses were used to describe the predictors of patients' scores on the MacArthur Perceived Coercion Scale. RESULTS: The use of legal force, being given orders, threats, and "a show of force" were all strongly correlated with perceived coercion. A least squares regression accounted for 43.3% of the variance in perceived coercion. The evidence also suggested that force is typically only used in conjunction with less coercive pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Force and negative symbolic pressures, such as threats and giving orders about admission decisions, induce perceptions of coercion in persons with mental illness. Positive symbolic pressures, such as persuasion, do not induce perceptions of coercion. Such positive pressures should be tried in order to encourage admission before force or negative pressures are used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.155.9.1254

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., Hoge, S. K., Kirsch, B. L., Monahan, J., Eisenberg, M., Gardner, W., & Roth, L. H.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
155
Issue
9
Pages
1254-1260
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2111165658
Cited by
106
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, psychiatric hospital admissions, legal force, threats, persuasion, admission decisions, mental illness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Hospital Records, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Patient Participation, Persuasive Communication, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review