Cited by 92Obesity, Physical Activity, DietBehavioral Health and InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Long-term weight gain prevention: A theoretically based Internet approach

Winett, Richard A., Tate, Deborah F., Anderson, Eileen S., Wojcik, Janet R., Winett, Sheila G.·2005·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background A major focus of Healthy People 2010 is promoting weight management and physical activity because overweight, obesity, and a sedentary lifestyle are strongly associated with risk for heart disease and stroke, diabetes, cancers, and premature death.Methods Prevalence data and a focused review of weight management and physical activity studies point to the long-term weight gain prevention in normal weight (21-25 BMI), overweight (25-29 BMI), and even moderate obese (30-34 BMI) people as one alternative to prioritizing weight loss in health behavior interventions. This is because on a population basis annual weight gain is small (approximately 0.8 kg/year) and preventing weight gain appears to require only an energy shift of about 100 cal/day either through a modest increase in physical activity and/or consuming slightly less calories to maintain an energy balance. A more dynamic use of social cognitive theory (SCT) for developing programs to maintain health behavior changes is emerging with some evidence of long-term maintenance. The high use of the Internet provides a vehicle to reach different population segments with readily accessible, SCT-tailored long-term programs. Research studies using the Internet with tailored SCT interventions have shown changes in nutrition practices, physical activity, and weight loss for up to a year.Conclusions One promising approach to weight gain prevention in population segments is the development and wide spread use of longer-term Internet programs using specific principles and procedures from SCT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.005

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winett, R. A., Tate, D. F., Anderson, E. S., Wojcik, J. R., & Winett, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Winett, Richard A.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
629-641
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977552691
Cited by
92
References
119
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk060058-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA79469, R01CA079469)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK 60058-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
weight gain prevention, obesity prevention, online intervention, social cognitive theory, weight management, physical activity, energy balance, Healthy People 2010
MeSH terms
Counseling, Feeding Behavior, Health Promotion, Humans, Obesity, Psychological Theory, Weight Gain, Exercise, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review