Cited by 199Behavioral Health and InterventionsUrban Transport and AccessibilityEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Adult Active Transportation

de Bruijn, Gert-Jan, Kremers, Stef P.J., Singh, Amika, van den Putte, Bas, van Mechelen, Willem·2009·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Many health behaviors have a history of repetition and, as a result, may become habitual. Because including a measure of habit strength may add depth to current theoretical models on health behavior, the present study explored the issue of habit strength within the context of the theory of planned behavior regarding adult bicycle use as a means of transportation.Methods Cross-sectional data were gathered in a Dutch adult sample (n=317; mean age=42.09 years; 46.7% men) in 2006 using self-administered questionnaires. Variables for the theory of planned behavior were assessed regarding bicycle use as a means of transportation; habit strength regarding bicycle use as a means of transportation was assessed with the validated Self-Reported Habit Index. Hierarchical regression analyses and interaction analyses using simple slope analyses were conducted.Results After controlling for variables for the theory of planned behavior, habit strength was the strongest predictor of bicycle use. In addition, simple slope analyses based on a significant interaction term, intention x habit, showed that intention was a significant predictor of bicycle use among those at low levels of habit strength for bicycle use (beta=0.67, p<0.001) but a weaker and nonsignificant predictor at high levels of habit strength (beta=0.10, p=0.136).Conclusions Habit strength is a moderator of the intention-behavior relationship regarding bicycle use, with intention becoming less relevant when bicycle use increases in habit strength. Future determinant and intervention studies on physical activity may benefit from including a measure of habit strength--for instance, by identifying the differential effects of informational and environmental interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.10.019

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
de Bruijn, G.-J., Kremers, S. P. J., Singh, A., van den Putte, B., & van Mechelen, W.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
189-194
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1857049811
Cited by
199
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
habit strength, theory of planned behavior, cycling, active travel, physical activity, behavioral intention, intention-behavior relationship, health behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Bicycling, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Psychological Theory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Transportation, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review