Cited by 55Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Territoriality, tolerance and testosterone in wild chimpanzees

Sobolewski, Marissa E., Brown, Janine L., Mitani, John C.·2012·Animal Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.018

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study found an anticipatory increase in urinary oxytocin in wild chimpanzees, similar to the anticipatory testosterone increase previously found in intergroup conflicts and intragroup competition in chimpanzees.

    “Our results demonstrate an anticipatory increase in urinary oxytocin in a similar manner to the anticipatory testosterone increase found in intergroup conflicts (28) and intragroup competition (29) in chimpanzees.”
  • Sobolewski et al. have shown that food sharing is linked to low urinary testosterone levels in wild male chimpanzees.

    “Sobolewski et al. [69] have shown that food sharing is linked to low urinary testosterone levels in wild male chimpanzees.”
  • In wild chimpanzees, urine samples following naturally-occurring food sharing events had low testosterone levels and high oxytocin levels.

    “In the context of food sharing in wild chimpanzees, urine samples following naturally-occurring food sharing events had low testosterone levels (Sobolewski et al., 2012) and high oxytocin levels (Wittig et al., 2014).”
  • Urinary testosterone was significantly higher following territorial boundary patrols compared with before patrols in wild chimpanzees.

    “Sobolewski et al. (2012) showed that urinary testosterone was significantly higher following territorial boundary patrols compared with before patrols.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sobolewski, M. E., Brown, J. L., & Mitani, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Sobolewski, Marissa E.
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
84
Issue
6
Pages
1469-1474
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144216472
Cited by
55
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Uganda Wildlife Authority
  • Uganda National Council for Science and Technology
  • Makerere University Biological Research Station
  • L.S.B. Leakey Foundation
  • U.S. National Science Foundation (IOB-0516644, BCS-0752637)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
testosterone, challenge hypothesis, territorial aggression, predatory behavior, meat sharing, tolerance, chimpanzees, urinary testosterone, hunting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review