Cited by 464Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

The limited impact of kinship on cooperation in wild chimpanzees

Open access
Langergraber, Kevin E., Mitani, John C., Vigilant, Linda·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The complex cooperative behavior exhibited by wild chimpanzees generates considerable theoretical and empirical interest, yet we know very little about the mechanisms responsible for its evolution. Here, we investigate the influence of kinship on the cooperative behavior of male chimpanzees living in an unusually large community at Ngogo in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Using long-term field observations and molecular genetic techniques to identify kin relations between individuals, we show that male chimpanzees clearly prefer to affiliate and cooperate with their maternal brothers in several behavioral contexts. Despite these results, additional analyses reveal that the impact of kinship is limited; paternal brothers do not selectively affiliate and cooperate, probably because they cannot be reliably recognized, and the majority of highly affiliative and cooperative dyads are actually unrelated or distantly related. These findings add to a growing body of research that indicates that animals cooperate with each other to obtain both direct and indirect fitness benefits and that complex cooperation can occur between kin and nonkin alike.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0611449104

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [5]Muller MN, Mitani JC. Adv Study Behav. 2005;35:275–331. [Google Scholar]
  2. [9]Henrich J, Henrich N. Cogn Sys Res. 2006;7:220–245. [Google Scholar]
  3. [10]Silk JB. Int J Primatol. 2002;23:849–875. [Google Scholar]
  4. [11]Mitani JC, Watts DP, Muller MN. Evol Anthropol. 2002;11:9–25. [Google Scholar]
  5. [16]Mitani JC, Watts DP, Pepper J, Merriwether DA. Anim Behav. 2002;64:727–737. [Google Scholar]
  6. [17]Mitani JC. In: Cooperation in Primates: Mechanisms and Evolution. Kappeler P, van Schaik C, editors. Berlin: Springer; 2005. pp. 101–113. [Google Scholar]
  7. [18]de Waal F, Brosnan S. In: Cooperation in Primates: Mechanisms and Evolution. Kappeler P, van Schaik C, editors. Berlin: Springer; 2005. pp. 85–105. [Google Scholar]
  8. [20]Altmann J. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1979;6:161–164. [Google Scholar]
  9. [22]Widdig A, Nürnberg P, Krawkzac M, Streich WJ, Bercovitch FB. Behaviour. 2002;139:371–391. [Google Scholar]
  10. [24]Silk JB, Altmann J, Alberts SC. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006;61:183–195. [Google Scholar]
  11. [27]Holmes WG, Sherman PW. Am Sci. 1983;71:46–55. [Google Scholar]
  12. [31]Charpentier MJE, Peignot P, Hossaert-McKey M, Wickings EJ. Anim Behav. 2007;73:37–45. [Google Scholar]
  13. [37]Struhsaker T. Ecology of an African Rainforest. Gainesville, FL: Univ Press of Florida; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  14. [38]Mitani JC, Watts DP. Anim Behav. 2001;61:915–924. [Google Scholar]
  15. [39]Mitani JC, Watts DP. Anim Behav. 2005;70:1079–1086. [Google Scholar]
  16. [41]Hayaki H, Huffman M, Nishida T. Primates. 1989;30:187–197. [Google Scholar]
  17. [42]de Vries H, Netto W, Hanegraaf P. Behaviour. 1993;125:157–175. [Google Scholar]
  18. [43]Landau HG. Bull Math Biophys. 1951;13:1–19. [Google Scholar]
  19. [44]de Vries H. Anim Behav. 1995;50:1375–1389. [Google Scholar]
  20. [46]Pepper JW, Mitani JC, Watts DP. Int J Primatol. 1999;20:613–632. [Google Scholar]
  21. [48]Holm S. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65–70. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langergraber, K. E., Mitani, J. C., & Vigilant, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-05-08
Volume
104
Issue
19
Pages
7786-7790
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2102487116
Cited by
464
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
29.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
kinship, cooperation, chimpanzees, indirect fitness benefits, social evolution, dyadic cooperation, relatedness
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Cooperative Behavior, Biological Evolution, Male, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review