Cited by 287Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Meat sharing among the Gombe chimpanzees: harassment and reciprocal exchange

Gilby, Ian C.·2006·Animal Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.009

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilby, I. C.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Gilby, Ian C.
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
953-963
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010730471
Cited by
287
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 24
FWCI
16.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Leakey Foundation
  • University of Minnesota
  • Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
meat sharing, chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii, reciprocal exchange, harassment, begging, grooming, social associations, food sharing, female receptivity, Gombe National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review