Cited by 222Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 180 of the 181 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 127 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Autoimmune diseases and immune-checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy: review of the literature and personalized risk-based prevention strategy

Open access

Abstract

Patients with cancer and with preexisting active autoimmune diseases (ADs) have been excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials because of concerns for high susceptibility to development of severe adverse events resulting from exacerbation of their preexisting ADs. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be safe and effective in this patient population. However, baseline corticosteroids (CS) and other nonselective immunosuppressants appear to negatively impact drug efficacy, whereas retrospective and case report data suggest that use of specific immunosuppressants may not have the same consequences. Therefore, we propose here a two-step strategy. First, to lower the risk of compromising ICI efficacy before their initiation, nonselective immunosuppressant drugs (nSIs) could be replaced by specific selective immunosuppressant drugs (SI) following a short rotation phase. Subsequently, combining ICI with the selective immunosuppressant could prevent exacerbation of the AD. For the most common active ADs encountered in the context of cancer, we propose specific algorithms to optimize ICI therapy. These preventive strategies go beyond current practices and recommendations, and should be practiced in ICI-specialized clinics, as these require multidisciplinary teams with extensive knowledge in the field of clinical immunology and oncology. In addition, we challenge the exclusion from ICI therapy for patients with cancer and active ADs and propose the implementation of an international registry to study such novel strategies in a prospective fashion.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that patients with cancer and preexisting active autoimmune diseases (ADs) should not be universally excluded from immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), because retrospective data suggest ICIs can be safe and effective in many such patients. It proposes a personalized two-step strategy: rotate off nonselective immunosuppressants to selective immunosuppressants before ICI initiation, then continue selective immunosuppression with ICIs under close multidisciplinary monitoring.

Key findings

  • Across retrospective studies, AD flares occurred in roughly 20%–40% of ICI-treated patients with preexisting ADs and were mostly manageable; in a 52-patient melanoma cohort, 38% flared at a median of 38 days, 85% of flares were grade 1/2, and response rates were similar with vs without flare (35% vs 31%).
  • Baseline immunosuppression was associated with worse outcomes: response was lower on immunosuppressants at ICI start (3/20, 15%) than without (14/32, 44%); baseline corticosteroids >10 mg prednisone were associated with poor outcome in NSCLC (odds ratio 0.42, P = 0.053; PFS HR 1.31, OS HR 1.66).
  • A systematic review of 123 patients with cancer and preexisting ADs found 41% had AD exacerbation, 25% had de novo irAEs, 17.1% permanently discontinued ICI, and 4.1% died; in 102 patients with preexisting IBD, GI adverse events occurred in 41% vs 11% without IBD, with no GI adverse event-related deaths.
  • In solid organ transplant recipients, a review of 39 ICI-treated patients reported allograft rejection in 41% (11 renal, 4 hepatic, 1 cardiac), median time to kidney rejection 21 days, and tumor response in 40% with rejection vs 52% without.

Methods

  • Design: narrative literature review and expert proposal, not a primary clinical study; it synthesizes retrospective cohorts, case reports, systematic reviews, and guideline-based AD treatments.
  • Data: PubMed search in English from 1 January 2008 to 30 December 2019 using terms including checkpoint inhibitor, immune-related adverse event, CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, preexisting autoimmune diseases, and specific ADs and immunosuppressants.
  • Analysis: qualitative synthesis of safety/efficacy data and development of AD-specific two-step algorithms combining selective immunosuppressive therapy rotation before ICI with concomitant maintenance during ICI treatment.

Limitations

  • The paper states that key limitations of the underlying studies are their retrospective nature, heterogeneity in patient populations and oncological disease, and selection bias because treating oncologists were inclined to treat these patients; few had previous life-threatening or markedly symptomatic AD.
  • The paper states that prospective studies are lacking, no consensus guidelines exist for this population, and there is no means to determine individual risk–benefit ratios.
  • Evident from the text: the proposed algorithms are expert-opinion and extrapolation-based, go beyond current recommendations, and have not been prospectively validated; the authors call for an international registry and AD-specific prospective trials.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.285

Cites

180 of 180 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 127 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 62 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
72 of 72
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Treatment of active ADs in cancer patients can be guided by analogy with the treatment of classical ADs.

    “Based on these data and by analogy with the treatment of classical ADs, patients with active ADs could be considered candidates for ICIs, even in the context of active immunosuppressive therapy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A 2-4 week rotation phase is sufficient to achieve AD stability before ICI initiation.

    “ICI treatment can be introduced after 2e4 weeks of AD stability under SIs, or alternatively concomitantly to the introduction of SIs in patients with rapid disease pace.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Standardized risk assessment for IBD exacerbation from ICI treatment is still lacking.

    “Standardized risk assessment for IBD exacerbation from ICI treatment is still lacking.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patients with severe baseline IBD activity without active IBD treatment at the time of ICI treatment will be more likely to have IBD exacerbation and its related complications.

    “In general, we usually anticipate that patients with severe baseline IBD activity without active IBD treatment at the time of ICI treatment will be more likely to have IBD exacerbation and its related complications.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The use of prednisone <10 mg/day or hydroxychloroquine at 5-7 mg/kg/day is tolerated.

    “The use of PDN < 10 mg/day or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) at 5e7 mg/kg/day is tolerated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    During tocilizumab therapy, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate will be completely normalized.

    “During TCZ therapy, we recommend avoiding the use of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate as biomarkers for GCA activity because they will be completely normalized under TCZ.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    IL-17 inhibitors may exacerbate or induce inflammatory bowel disease.

    “IBD is of special interest when using IL-17 inhibitors since these agents may exacerbate or induce IBD, although real-life data are very reassuring.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Effective treatment of arthritis immune-related adverse events requires a prolonged treatment period.

    “Because effective treatment of arthritis irAEs requires a prolonged treatment period, in this case, an anti-TNF-a inhibitor may potentially dampen the antitumor benefit of ICI therapy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Antisynthetase syndrome is associated with a higher prevalence of interstitial lung disease than dermatomyositis and polymyositis.

    “In contrast to other IIMs, ASS is associated with a higher prevalence of ILD than dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM), representing IIMs with which it shares many features.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The place of tocilizumab in spondyloarthritis is not yet clear, with inconsistent or mixed responses.

    “The place of TCZ in this indication is not yet clear with inconsistent or mixed responses.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Optimal dosing of mepolizumab in patients with corticosteroid-refractory hypereosinophilic syndrome is variable depending on HES subtype but globally ranges from 300 mg to 750 mg monthly.

    “Optimal dosing in patients with GS-refractory disease requires further study; it seems to be variable depending on HES subtype but globally ranges from 300 mg to 750 mg monthly.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    300 mg subcutaneous monthly mepolizumab is likely to be effective in most patients with corticosteroid-refractory hypereosinophilic syndrome.

    “Other emerging data suggest that 300 mg s.c.monthly is likely to be effective in most of these subjects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms of immune-related adverse events and autoimmune diseases are similar enough that treatments for primary autoimmune diseases can be extrapolated to ICI-treated patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases.

    “based on current immuno-pathophysiological knowledge and on extrapolations from treatment options for primary ADs”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Selective immunosuppressive therapy can prevent autoimmune disease exacerbations or graft rejection without compromising ICI effectiveness.

    “without compromising ICI effectiveness”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The proposed treatments (e.g., mepolizumab, benralizumab, rituximab, belimumab) are safe and effective in ICI-treated patients with autoimmune diseases.

    “we recommend preferentially the introduction of concomitant mepolizumab 300 mg once monthly or benralizumab 30 mg once monthly preventatively for asymptomatic patients with AEC > 5 G/l”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cytokine profile and specific active immune cell types can guide personalized choice of selective immunosuppressive therapy.

    “personalized choice of the best SIT is one of the most promising future directions and should be based on precision medicine strategies, according to the cytokine profile and specific active immune cell types involved in the AD of individual patients.”
16 of 16

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Psoriasis recommendations disagree on the next choice after anti-IL-12/23

    Major

    The main text ranks anti-IL-23 second and anti-IL-17 third, while the Figure 2 description recommends anti-IL-17 when the preferred anti-IL-12/23 treatment is unavailable.

  • GCA monitoring algorithm includes biomarkers the text says to avoid

    Minor

    The GCA section recommends avoiding CRP and ESR as activity biomarkers during tocilizumab therapy, but its monitoring algorithm includes both in regular biological evaluation.

  • IBD prevalence differs between the NSCLC cohort description and table

    Minor

    The description of the 56-patient NSCLC cohort reports IBD in 11%, whereas its Table 1 entry lists IBD in 20%.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 181 references

1 of the 181 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 222

Metadata

Authors
Haanen, J., Ernstoff, M. S., Wang, Y., Menzies, A. M., Puzanov, I., Grivas, P., Larkin, J., Peters, S., Thompson, J. A., & Obeid, M.
Affiliations
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (US)
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
724-744
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012088984
Cited by
222
References
181
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Fondation Leenaards
  • Neos Therapeutics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
autoimmune disease, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer immunotherapy, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, drug efficacy, adverse events, treatment algorithm, patient selection, international registry
MeSH terms
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Autoimmune Diseases, Humans, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review