Cited by 83Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Group differences in captive gorillas’ reaction to large crowds

Kuhar, Christopher W.·2008·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.011

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhar, C. W.
Corresponding author
Kuhar, Christopher W.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
110
Issue
3-4
Pages
377-385
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050569077
Cited by
83
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
western lowland gorilla, captive animal behavior, crowd size, zoo animal welfare, bachelor groups, family groups, aggression, visual barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review