Cited by 8Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Hippocampal GABA A antagonism reverses the novel object recognition deficit in sub-chronic phencyclidine-treated rats

Neugebauer, Nichole M., Miyauchi, Masanori, Sato, Tatsuya, Tadano, Jun, Akal, Hanife, Ardehali, Hossein, Meltzer, Herbert Y.·2018·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Background Abnormalities in prefrontal cortical and hippocampal GABAergic function are postulated to be major causes of the cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS). There are conflicting views on whether diminished or enhanced GABAergic activity contributes to the deficit in short-term novel object recognition (NOR) in the sub-chronic phencyclidine (scPCP) rodent model of CIAS. This study assessed the role of GABA A signaling in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ventral hippocampus (vHPC) in NOR in saline (scSAL)- and scPCP-treated rats.Methods The effects of local administration of a GABA A agonist (muscimol) into the vHPC or mPFC and an antagonist (bicuculline) or a GABA A/benzodiazepine partial agonist (bretazenil) into the vHPC on NOR in scSAL and scPCP-treated rats were determined.Results In scSAL-treated rats, injection of muscimol into the vHPC, but not mPFC, induced a deficit in NOR. The scPCP-induced NOR deficit was significantly reversed by intra-vHPC bicuculline, while intra-vHPC bretazenil produced a non-significant trend for reversal (p = .06). scPCP treatment increased mRNA expression of GABA A γ 2 in PFC and GABA A α 5 and GABA A β 1 in the HPC. However, GABA concentration in the PFC or HPC was not altered.Conclusions These findings indicate that the scPCP-induced NOR deficit can be rescued by reducing GABA A receptor stimulation in vHPC, indicating that increased vHPC GABA A inhibition may contribute to the scPCP-induced NOR deficit in rats. These results also indicate that excessive GABA A receptor signalling in the vHPC has a deleterious effect on NOR in normal rats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.033

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neugebauer, N. M., Miyauchi, M., Sato, T., Tadano, J., Akal, H., Ardehali, H., & Meltzer, H. Y.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Meltzer, Herbert Y.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
342
Pages
11-18
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2779889570
Cited by
7
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
GABAA receptor, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, novel object recognition, schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, muscimol, bicuculline, bretazenil, GABAergic inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Bicuculline, Female, Hippocampus, Muscimol, Phencyclidine, Receptors, GABA-A, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, Models, Animal, Rats, GABA-A Receptor Agonists, GABA-A Receptor Antagonists, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review