Cited by 14Schizophrenia research and treatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health and Psychiatry

Negative Interpretation Biases Precede the Onset of Psychosis

Open access
Yiend, Jenny, Allen, Paul, Lopez, Natalie D., Falkenberg, Irina, Tseng, Huai-Hsuan, McGuire, Philip·2019·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

This study investigated whether a negative interpretation bias was present in people at high risk for psychosis. People with an At Risk Mental State (ARMS; n = 21), patients with First Episode Psychosis (FEP; n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 20) performed three tasks, each of which was designed to measure interpretation bias. Both ARMS and FEP participants showed an attenuated positive bias compared to controls. These findings extend previous results investigating interpretation bias in psychosis by showing that interpretative biases are present before the onset of psychosis, and could therefore contribute to its development. Biased interpretation mechanisms could be a new target for clinical intervention in the early phase of psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2018.11.002

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBM-pa was developed based on previous empirical evidence of the presence of paranoia-relevant interpretation biases in people with clinical and subclinical paranoia as well as in those in the At Risk Mental State (ARMS).

    “CBM-pa was developed based on previous empirical evidence of the presence of paranoia-relevant interpretation biases in people with clinical [3] and subclinical [4] paranoia as well as in those in the At Risk Mental State (ARMS) [15].”

    From A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

    The available passages contain the paper’s title, bibliographic details, and keywords, including “at risk mental state,” but no findings about paranoia-relevant interpretation biases in people in the ARMS. Searches for ARMS interpretation biases and empirical evidence returned no passage that establishes the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yiend, J., Allen, P., Lopez, N. D., Falkenberg, I., Tseng, H.-H., & McGuire, P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Yiend, Jenny
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
718-731
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901751313
Cited by
14
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
interpretation bias, negative interpretation bias, psychosis, clinical high risk for psychosis, first-episode psychosis, transition to psychosis, cognitive biases, early intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review