Cited by 35Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Exposing Worry’s Deceit: Percentage of Untrue Worries in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Treatment

Open access
LaFreniere, Lucas S., Newman, Michelle G.·2020·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Theories of cognitive therapy have long proposed that those with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) have inaccurate expectations. By challenging them with objective evidence, symptoms are thought to decrease. To test these premises, this study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) during the Worry Outcome Journal (WOJ) treatment to determine the percentage of GAD worries that did not come true. We then analyzed the association between participants' untrue worry percentages and GAD symptom change across treatment. Twenty-nine participants with GAD recorded worries when prompted for 10 days, reviewed them online nightly, and tracked their worry outcomes across 30 days. These recordings were then coded by independent raters. Analyses applied bias-correct bootstrapping path analysis on slopes extracted from longitudinal linear mixed models. Primary results revealed that 91.4% of worry predictions did not come true. Higher percentages of untrue worries significantly predicted lower GAD symptoms after treatment, as well as a greater slope of symptom reduction from pre- to post-trial. Participants' average expected likelihoods of worries coming true were much greater than actual observed likelihoods. The most common percentage of untrue worries per person was 100%. Thus, worries in those with GAD were mostly inaccurate. Greater evidence of this inaccuracy predicted greater improvement in treatment. As theorized, disconfirming false expectations may significantly contribute to treatment's effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2019.07.003

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with versus without generalized anxiety disorder experienced an increased sense of threat and reduced emotional control.

    “They also experienced an increased sense of threat and reduced emotional control [24-26].”

    From Treatment condition as a moderator and change in trait mindfulness as a mediator of a brief mindfulness ecological momentary intervention for generalized anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The paper’s introductory discussion reports that excessive worrying and GAD have been associated with higher estimates of negative outcomes than in controls, supporting the increased-threat part of the claim. The Methods describe uncontrollable worry as a GAD symptom, but the paper does not report a comparison of emotional control between people with and without GAD. Its study participants all had GAD. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prolonged worry has been causally linked to decreased vagal tone and increased blood pressure.

    “Physiologically, prolonged worry has been causally linked to decreased vagal tone [i.e., higher resting heart rate; 24] and increased blood pressure [79].”

    From Treatment condition as a moderator and change in trait mindfulness as a mediator of a brief mindfulness ecological momentary intervention for generalized anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Method > Procedure and Results > Descriptive Analyses passages address recorded worries, distress, and whether feared outcomes occurred. Searches for vagal tone, resting heart rate, and blood pressure found no passage linking prolonged worry to either physiological outcome, causally or otherwise. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaFreniere, L. S., & Newman, M. G.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
LaFreniere, Lucas S.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
413-423
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2960669587
Cited by
35
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH115128)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, worry, cognitive therapy, treatment response, symptom change, ecological momentary assessment
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review