The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component
Open accessAbstract
Recently, macrophages have been characterized as having an M1 or M2 phenotype based on receptor expression, cytokine and effector molecule production, and function. The effects of macrophage phenotype upon tissue remodeling following the implantation of a biomaterial are largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of a cellular component within an implanted extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold upon macrophage phenotype, and to determine the relationship between macrophage phenotype and tissue remodeling. Partial-thickness defects in the abdominal wall musculature of Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with autologous body wall tissue, acellular allogeneic rat body wall ECM, xenogeneic pig urinary bladder tissue, or acellular xenogeneic pig urinary bladder ECM. At 3, 7, 14, and 28 days the host tissue response was characterized using histologic, immunohistochemical, and RT-PCR methods. The acellular test articles were shown to elicit a predominantly M2 type response and resulted in constructive remodeling, while those containing a cellular component, even an autologous cellular component, elicited a predominantly M1 type response and resulted in deposition of dense connective tissue and/or scarring. We conclude that the presence of cellular material within an ECM scaffold modulates the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response following implantation, and that the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response appears to be related to tissue remodeling outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“What is more, it is widely accepted that during the degradation of implanted ECM bioscaffolds, ECM components are released into the environment and promote the transition to a remodeling phase [18,44,74,78].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mechanistically, inadequate decellularization retains high amounts of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) or endotoxin, and excessive crosslinking biases macrophages toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes that drive fibrosis and poor remodeling [73,74].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Immunohistochemical and gene expression analysis using CCR7 and iNOS for M1 and CD163 and Arg for M2 macrophages revealed that cellular scaffolds had a majority of M1 phenotype and provided a dense, poorly organized collagenous FBC, while decellularized scaffolds favored the M2 phenotype, and displayed both neomatrix formation and early angiogenesis.”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [180]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Recognition of the predominant MΦ phenotypic profile can provide a tool by which a tissue regenerative outcome can be predicted and possibly promoted [4].”
From Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Brown et al. [83], who demonstrated that the presence of even an autologous cellular component attracted M1 cells, which was not observed in cell free constructs.”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“Briefly, scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) have been shown to promote a switch from a predominantly M1 cell population immediately following implantation to a population enriched in M2 cells by 7–14 days post implantation [154–156].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“This constructive remodeling response has been directly linked to the ability of the material to modulate macrophage phenotype [154–157].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“Here we find that MΦ activation depends on biomaterial architecture in addition to previously implicated biomaterial chemistry and bioactivity (34–36).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Previous in vivo studies demonstrated concurrent expression of M1 and M2 markers (37), and enhanced expression of M2 markers has been associated with improved outcomes for implanted biologic scaffolds (34).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodAnalyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method
Schmittgen, T. D., & Livak, K. J. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.73 · Cited by 26,190 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodThe chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534 · cited 3×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundMANTOVANI, A., SOZZANI, S., LOCATI, M., ALLAVENA, P., & SICA, A. (2002) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02302-5 · Cited by 5,528
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
BackgroundMutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287 · cited 2×
“Polarized macrophages are referred to as either M1 or M2 cells, mimicking the Th1/Th2 nomenclature [9].”
BackgroundMartínez, F. O., Gordon, S., Locati, M., & Mantovani, A. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303 · Cited by 2,399 · cited 1×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundDecellularization of tissues and organs
Gilbert, T. W., Sellaro, T. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 · Cited by 2,222 · cited 2×
“The decellularization methods used to process ECM scaffolds may alter these molecules such that they can no longer negatively influence the host response or there may be a threshold amount required to alter the host response to an ECM scaffold [25].”
MethodSelf-citationThe many faces of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M. (2003) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0602325 · Cited by 1,902 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–896 of 896
Brennan-Pierce, E. P. (2009) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Chen, G., & Kawazoe, N. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9780470027318.a9472.pub2 · Cited by 1
Guillory, R. J. (2019) · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/967 · Cited by 1
The effect of azithromycin on acute and chronic inflammation in an in vivo experimental model.
Bois, D. (2013) · Cited by 1
Vagina reconstruction by decellularization of healthy human vaginal tissuePreprint
Sueters, J., Xiao, F., Roovers, J., Bouman, M., Groenman, F. A., Maas, H., Huirne, J. A. F., & Smit, T. H. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.04.05.23288175 · Cited by 1
Neurorestorative Approaches for Ischemic Stroke - Challenges, Opportunities, and Recent AdvancesPreprint
Michór, P., Renardson, L., & Boltze, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4635803 · Cited by 1
Bryan, A. E., Krutko, M., Rebholz, S. L., Marquez, L., Busch, E., Dong, K., Pixley, S. K., Cushion, M. T., Esfandiari, L., & Harris, G. M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5055754 · Cited by 1
Mechanisms of Biomaterial-Mediated Cardiac and Esophageal Repair
Londoño, R. (2015) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Development of three-dimensional patterning strategies for osteochondral tissue engineering
Sawkins, M. J. (2013) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)
Williams, P. N., Mistry, J. B., & Dines, J. S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7494-5_6
Brown, B. N. (2010) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Self-citationCrosstalk between colorectal cancer cells and tumour-associated macrophages
Zhang, Y. (2013) · Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Eighth Symposium on Biologic Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine
Dearth, C. L. (2014) · Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.2217/rme.14.41
Kwan, S. Y. (2011) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6723587
Engineering contractile myocardial tissue using extracellular matrix scaffolds
Remlinger, N. T. (2013) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SCAFFOLDS FOR AUGMENTATION OF ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRS
Aurora, A. (2010) · EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University)
Functional Tissue Reconstruction with the Use of Biologic Scaffolds
Badylak, S. F., Ogilvie, J. B., & Gilbert, T. W. (2009) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-366-4_11
Self-citationThrombogenecity of decellularized and re-endothelialized baboon arteries
Khemisi, M. M. (2015)
Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Macrophages, and Biomaterials During Myocardial Repair
Pallotta, I., Wrona, E. A., Sun, B. Q., & Freytes, D. O. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18045-8_1
Goh, S. K. (2015) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Engineered Fibrin Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Repair
Thomson, K. S. (2013) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Stearns-Reider, K. M., & Ambrosio, F. (2015) · Stem cell biology and regenerative medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3228-3_8
The Effect of Polymer Chain Mobility on Protein Adsorption and Subsequent Cell Behavior
Vyner, M. C. (2015) · QSpace (Queen's University Library)
Moura, C. C. G., Miyagaki, D. C., Oliveira, M. J., Rodrigues, D. B. R., Dechichi, P., & Biffi, J. C. G. (2014) · Dental Press Endodontics · doi:10.14436/2178-3713.4.3.014-020.oar
Mokarram, N. (2015) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology)
Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for treatment of volumetric muscle loss
Dziki, J. L. (2017) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Parker, L. C. (2017) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
On the role of macrophages, microglia and the extracellular matrix in remyelination
Wang, P. (2018) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Decellularisation of the dental pulp for use as a scaffold in regenerative endodontics
Matoug‐Elwerfelli, M. (2017) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Tolouei, A. E. (2018) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/diss-tolouei-anita-2018
A Study of Macrophages in the Aging Liver and in the Host Response to Engineered Lung Scaffolds
Stahl, E. C. (2019) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Bioengineering The Fracture Callus: Bone Repair Through Fracture Mimetics
Vas, W. J. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
[Effect of cells in the epimysium conduit on the regeneration of peripheral nerve].
Feng, W., Lu, H., Xu, Z., Chen, L., Yang, X., & Qi, Z. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.7507/1002-1892.201712092
Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering: Polymeric Starter Matrices for
Dijkman, P. E., Generali, M., Weber, B., & Hoerstrup, S. P. (2016) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.1081/e-ebpp-120052312
AGED MUSCLE ECM RECAPITULATES ALTERED HOST RESPONSE OBSERVED IN AGED MUSCLE INJURY
LoPresti, S. T. (2019) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Cellular Mechanisms of Bioresorption of a Porous 3D Matrix Based on Chitosan
Popryadukhin, P. V., Yukina, G. Y., Dobrovol’skaya, I. P., Ivan’kova, E. M., & Yudin, V. E. (2019) · Cell and Tissue Biology · doi:10.1134/s1990519x19060087
Imbir, G., Major, R., Mzyk, A., Wilczek, P., Sanak, M., Strzelec, M., Ostrowski, R., & Rycyk, A. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52180-6_32
Differential fate of acellular vascular scaffolds in vivo involves macrophages and T-cell subsetsPreprint
Banerjee, D., Nayakawde, N. B., Antony, D., Deshmukh, M. V., Ghosh, S., Sihlbom, C., Berger, E., Haq, U. U., & Olausson, M. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.21.392654
“can lead to scar tissue formation [52, 53].”
Scaffold augmentation in rotator cuff repair
Mesiha, M., Ricchetti, E. T., Derwin, K. A., & Iannotti, J. P. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-2-294-71318-7.00016-2
Biologic Options in Rotator Cuff Repair: Current Indications and Techniques
Gentile, J. M., & Gulotta, L. V. (2017) · Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1097/bte.0000000000000110
Engineering Adhesion Substrates as Biomaterials for Cell Fate Control
Wong, S. Y. (2016) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Immunomodulatory Contribution of Mast Cells to the Regenerative Biomaterial MicroenvironmentPreprint
Wang, R. M., Mesfin, J. M., Ungerleider, J. L., Kawakami, Y., Kawakami, Y., Kawakami, T., & Christman, K. L. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.31.231852
Suspended Manufacturing of Multi-Layered Biopolymer Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering
Senior, J. J. (2020) · University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield)
Fantin, A. (2020) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Itoh, M., Imasu, H., Takano, K., Umezu, M., Okazaki, K., & Iwasaki, K. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1030698/v1
Wu, J., Wang, M., Chen, F., Tang, Y., Zhi, W., Chen, X., & Zhang, X. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3953117
Kim, B. S., & Kim, H. T. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2723-9_7
Biomaterials and immunomodulation for spinal cord repair
Oudega, M., & Maldonado-Lasunción, I. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821440-4.00011-6
Tissue Engineering and Graft Options
Çelik, H., Türkmen, İ., & Karahan, M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94702-6_21
Chapple, C. R. (2019) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.726864966.793560597
Gilbert, T. W. (2009) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.008
Wang, R. M., Duran, P., & Christman, K. L. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816137-1.00027-1
Lelis, M., Tučkutė, S., Demikyte, E., Vasiliauske, D., Urbonavičius, M., Varnagiris, Š., & Sakalauskaitė, S. (2022) · doi:10.26799/cp-nanotechfrance2022/1
Paige, J. T., Lightell, D., Douglas, H. F., Klingenberg, N. C., Pham, T., & Woods, T. C. (2023) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/exd.14845 · Cited by 2
Makrophagen-Reaktion auf Biomaterialien bei kardiovaskulären Anwendungen
Roy, S., Schmuck, E. G., & Raval, A. N. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25378-2_6
Revolutionizing Bone Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review On Bone Grafts
Raut, S., Madhu, P. P., & Reche, A. R. (2023) · International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research · doi:10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.6.l312-l324
Kolomenskaya, E. R., Butova, V. V., Rusalev, Y. V., Protsenko, B. O., Soldatov, A. V., & Butakova, M. A. (2024) · Journal of Surface Investigation X-ray Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques · doi:10.1134/s102745102470023x
Skepastianos, G., Mallis, P., Kostopoulos, E., Michalopoulos, Ε., Skepastianos, V., Doudakmanis, C., Palazi, C., & Tsourouflis, G. S. (2024) · Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering · doi:10.3233/bme-240144
“48 This event may further be supported by the fact that only a low number of T helper (CD4+) and cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) were evident in the decellularized full-thickness abdominal wall samples, indicating that no cytotoxicity or graft rejection events occurred.”
Kolomenskaya, E. R., Butova, V. V., Rusalev, Y. V., Protsenko, B. O., Soldatov, A. V., & Butakova, M. A. (2024) · Поверхность Рентгеновские синхротронные и нейтронные исследования · doi:10.31857/s1028096024060025
Ruan, W., Wang, G., Qu, Q., Gai, X., Wang, C., Liu, J., Zhu, F., Qu, Z., & Liu, C. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7324829/v1
Bioresorbable materials in tissue engineering and regeneration: design and applications
Sharma, D., Mishra, A. K., Magani, S. K. J., & Dahiya, S. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-31606-7.00019-3
Kidney Tissue Engineering Using Decellularized Organs and Pluripotent Stem Cells
Williams, M. J. (2013) · University of Florida Digital Collections (University of Florida)
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & Ling, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311250
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & ling, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311244
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & Ling, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311241
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & ling, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311235
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & ling, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311238
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & Ling, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311232
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & ling, J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311247
Niu, Y., Stadler, F. J., Yang, X., Deng, F., Liu, G., & Xia, H. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16664615
Biyomalzemelerle Sinyal Yolu Modülasyonu: Hücresel Mekanizmalardan Terapötik Uygulamalara
Çırçırlı, B., & Emre, M. C. (2025) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub1126.c4580
Zhao, D., Ding, Y., Yan, Z., Zhao, J., Yu, M., Mou, X., & Cai, Y. (2026) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115737
Three-Dimensional Printed Biomimetic Polymer Scaffolds for Wound Healing
Kumar, A., Singh, N., Chopra, D. S., Singh, D., & Singh, N. (2026) · Biomedical engineering · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1013675
Rader, A., Orr, L. J., & Becher, Z. (2026) · Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · doi:10.1055/a-2856-1085
Evolution from Supramolecular Polymer Grafts to Natural Tissue: The aXess Device
Mestres, G., Bauer, H., Cox, M. A. J., Riambau, V., & Moll, F. L. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1014621
Cho, H., Jung, S., 서다은, & Khang, G. (2026) · Macromolecular Research · doi:10.1007/s13233-026-00522-x
Ruan, W., Wang, G., Qu, Q., Gai, X., Wang, C., Liu, J., Zhu, F., Qu, Z., & Liu, C. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47592-6
“Residual mass (W 1 ) was measured after 3, 7, and 10 days. structural components) to mimic the physiological breakdown of ECM and separately analyze the bioactivity of released factors versus the remaining scaffold structure 15 .”
Lin, J., Luo, M., Qi, H., Wu, X., Li, J., Feng, Y., Li, Z., Luo, F., Li, J., Tan, H., et al. (2026) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2026.178332
Ponomareva, Y. V., Korolev, M. V., Supil’nikov, A. A., Stolyarov, S. A., & Belokonev-Bezzubov, A. R. (2026) · Hirurg (Surgeon) · doi:10.33920/med-15-2603-05
Decellularized biomaterials for tendon-to-bone healing: Advances and translational challenges
Jin, H., Zhang, C. F., Chen, J. C., Zhang, G., Tang, X., & Huang, Y. (2026) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2026.07.033
Ghosh, S., & Pati, F. (2026) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2026.124508 · Cited by 1
A Dynamic Modeling Framework for Real-Time Monitoring of Porcine Lung Tissue Decellularization
Wang, Z., Bedsaul, A., Hincher, C. G., Jimenez-Socha, M., White, S. E., Sze, D., Ducoste, J. J., Mora‐Navarro, C., & Freytes, D. O. (2026) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6c00414
Introduction to translational tissue engineering
Kumar, S., Durgapal, A., & Verma, Y. K. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-33455-9.00021-3
Kim, M. W., Lee, H., Billman, E., Kim, I., Ju, Y. M., Atala, A., Yoo, J. J., & Kim, J. H. (2026) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2026.09.040
Tran, H. N., Vu, N. M., Do, X.-H., Nguyen, T.-C., Phung, L. X., Le, D. D., Dinh, H. D., Than, U. T. T., Nguyen, L. T., Dang, X.-K., et al. (2026) · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13770-026-00841-1
Hydrogel bioink in three-dimensional bioprinting technology
Bhowmick, A., Banerjee, S., Ghosh, B., Mukhopadhyay, M., & Bhattacharya, D. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34207-3.00021-6
O’Rourke, S. A., Gonnella, G., Kronemberger, G. S., Petrousek, S., Hoey, D. A., Dunne, A., & Kelly, D. J. (2026) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.70155
Adipogenesis within a Hollow Fiber-Based, Three-Dimensional Dynamic Perfusion Bioreactor
Minteer, D. M. (2015) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, B. N., Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., McCabe, G. P., & Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1482-1491
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2805023
- OpenAlex
- W1999579326
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 36.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (F31EB007914)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- macrophage phenotype, macrophage polarization, tissue remodeling, extracellular matrix scaffolds, acellular scaffolds, cellular scaffolds, host tissue response, scar formation, connective tissue deposition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Nucleus, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Indoles, Macrophages, Phenotype, Transplantation, Autologous, Transplantation, Heterologous, Transplantation, Homologous, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Prosthesis Implantation, Sus scrofa, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
