The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component
Open accessAbstract
Recently, macrophages have been characterized as having an M1 or M2 phenotype based on receptor expression, cytokine and effector molecule production, and function. The effects of macrophage phenotype upon tissue remodeling following the implantation of a biomaterial are largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of a cellular component within an implanted extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold upon macrophage phenotype, and to determine the relationship between macrophage phenotype and tissue remodeling. Partial-thickness defects in the abdominal wall musculature of Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with autologous body wall tissue, acellular allogeneic rat body wall ECM, xenogeneic pig urinary bladder tissue, or acellular xenogeneic pig urinary bladder ECM. At 3, 7, 14, and 28 days the host tissue response was characterized using histologic, immunohistochemical, and RT-PCR methods. The acellular test articles were shown to elicit a predominantly M2 type response and resulted in constructive remodeling, while those containing a cellular component, even an autologous cellular component, elicited a predominantly M1 type response and resulted in deposition of dense connective tissue and/or scarring. We conclude that the presence of cellular material within an ECM scaffold modulates the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response following implantation, and that the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response appears to be related to tissue remodeling outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“What is more, it is widely accepted that during the degradation of implanted ECM bioscaffolds, ECM components are released into the environment and promote the transition to a remodeling phase [18,44,74,78].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mechanistically, inadequate decellularization retains high amounts of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) or endotoxin, and excessive crosslinking biases macrophages toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes that drive fibrosis and poor remodeling [73,74].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Immunohistochemical and gene expression analysis using CCR7 and iNOS for M1 and CD163 and Arg for M2 macrophages revealed that cellular scaffolds had a majority of M1 phenotype and provided a dense, poorly organized collagenous FBC, while decellularized scaffolds favored the M2 phenotype, and displayed both neomatrix formation and early angiogenesis.”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [180]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Recognition of the predominant MΦ phenotypic profile can provide a tool by which a tissue regenerative outcome can be predicted and possibly promoted [4].”
From Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Brown et al. [83], who demonstrated that the presence of even an autologous cellular component attracted M1 cells, which was not observed in cell free constructs.”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“Briefly, scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) have been shown to promote a switch from a predominantly M1 cell population immediately following implantation to a population enriched in M2 cells by 7–14 days post implantation [154–156].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“This constructive remodeling response has been directly linked to the ability of the material to modulate macrophage phenotype [154–157].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“Here we find that MΦ activation depends on biomaterial architecture in addition to previously implicated biomaterial chemistry and bioactivity (34–36).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Previous in vivo studies demonstrated concurrent expression of M1 and M2 markers (37), and enhanced expression of M2 markers has been associated with improved outcomes for implanted biologic scaffolds (34).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodAnalyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method
Schmittgen, T. D., & Livak, K. J. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.73 · Cited by 26,190 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodThe chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534 · cited 3×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundMANTOVANI, A., SOZZANI, S., LOCATI, M., ALLAVENA, P., & SICA, A. (2002) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02302-5 · Cited by 5,528
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
BackgroundMutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287 · cited 2×
“Polarized macrophages are referred to as either M1 or M2 cells, mimicking the Th1/Th2 nomenclature [9].”
BackgroundMartínez, F. O., Gordon, S., Locati, M., & Mantovani, A. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303 · Cited by 2,399 · cited 1×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundDecellularization of tissues and organs
Gilbert, T. W., Sellaro, T. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 · Cited by 2,222 · cited 2×
“The decellularization methods used to process ECM scaffolds may alter these molecules such that they can no longer negatively influence the host response or there may be a threshold amount required to alter the host response to an ECM scaffold [25].”
MethodSelf-citationThe many faces of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M. (2003) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0602325 · Cited by 1,902 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 896
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Repair with a Cardiac Biologic Scaffold
Wainwright, J. M., Hashizume, R., Fujimoto, K. L., Remlinger, N. T., Pesyna, C., Wagner, W. R., Tobita, K., Gilbert, T. W., & Badylak, S. F. (2011) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000331400 · Cited by 78
“The cellular infiltrate and neovascularization that was observed in the remodeled C-ECM material is typical of the in vivo host response to non-cross-linked ECM biologic scaffold materials, such as small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and urinary bladder matrix (UBM) [Badylak et al., 2002; Gilbert et al., 2007; Brown et a…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBrown, B. N., Chung, W. L., Almarza, A. J., Pavlick, M. D., Reppas, S. N., Ochs, M. W., Russell, A. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.12.030 · Cited by 83
“The collagen and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of the remodeled UBM device were determined as a percentage of the dry weight using a hydroxyproline assay and a sulfated GAG assay according to the published protocols.(35,36) The water content was etermined as the percentage of water per total tissue eight by allowing…”
Self-citationSlivka, P. F., Dearth, C. L., Keane, T. J., Meng, F. W., Medberry, C. J., Riggio, R. T., Reing, J. E., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c4bm00189c · Cited by 77
Self-citationThe impact of decellularization agents on renal tissue extracellular matrix
Poornejad, N., Schaumann, L. B., Buckmiller, E. M., Momtahan, N., Gassman, J. R., Ma, H. H., Roeder, B. L., Reynolds, P. R., & Cook, A. D. (2016) · Journal of Biomaterials Applications · doi:10.1177/0885328216656099 · Cited by 78
“Elimination of cellular remnants is critical; otherwise inflammation, fibrosis, and scar tissue formation can occur after transplantation.(21,43,44) A variety of materials have been used for decellularization of native tissues including alkaline solutions, acidic solutions, ionic detergents, non-ionic detergents, and…”
BackgroundThe Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials
Lock, A. M., Cornish, J., & Musson, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb10030031 · Cited by 77
“For example, if there was a high pro- to anti-inflammatory ratio, the material would likely induce a severe foreign body response, while high anti- to pro-inflammatory ratios have been associated with positive healing outcomes in vivo [28,29].”
BackgroundRegeneration techniques for bone-to-tendon and muscle-to-tendon interfaces reconstruction
Baldino, L., Cardea, S., Maffulli, N., & Reverchon, E. (2016) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldv056 · Cited by 78
Preparation and characterization of a biologic scaffold from esophageal mucosa
Keane, T. J., Londoño, R., Carey, R. M., Carruthers, C. A., Reing, J. E., Dearth, C. L., D’Amore, A., Medberry, C. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.052 · Cited by 76
Self-citationLocal effect of IL‐4 delivery on polyethylene particle induced osteolysis in the murine calvarium
Rao, A. J., Nich, C., Dhulipala, L., Gibon, E., Valladares, R. D., Zwingenberger, S., Smith, R. L., & Goodman, S. B. (2012) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34486 · Cited by 78
Boddupalli, A., Zhu, L., & Bratlie, K. M. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201600532 · Cited by 79
Gentile, N. E., Stearns, K. M., Brown, E. H. P., Rubin, J. P., Boninger, M. L., Dearth, C. L., Ambrosio, F., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000145 · Cited by 75
Self-citationBiomaterial–Mesenchymal Stem Cell Constructs for Immunomodulation in Composite Tissue Engineering
Hanson, S. E., D’Souza, R. N., & Hematti, P. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0359 · Cited by 76
Ding, J., Chen, B., Lv, T., Liu, X., Fu, X., Wang, Q., Li, Y., Kang, N., Cao, Y., & Xiao, R. (2016) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0263 · Cited by 76
Mechanisms by which acellular biologic scaffolds promote functional skeletal muscle restoration
Badylak, S. F., Dziki, J. L., Sicari, B. M., Ambrosio, F., & Boninger, M. L. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.047 · Cited by 77
Self-citationShamaei, M., Mortaz, E., Pourabdollah, M., Garssen, J., Tabarsi, P., Velayati, A. A., & Adcock, I. M. (2017) · Human Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2017.10.009 · Cited by 75
Biomaterials for revascularization and immunomodulation after spinal cord injury
Haggerty, A. E., Maldonado, I. C., & Oudega, M. (2018) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/aaa9d8 · Cited by 74
Fabricating Lattice Structures via 3D Printing: The Case of Porous Bio-Engineered Scaffolds
Kantaros, A., & Piromalis, D. D. (2021) · Applied Mechanics · doi:10.3390/applmech2020018 · Cited by 74
“Tissue engineering strategies nowadays being slowly established in clinical practice, leading towards this direction [14,52].”
BackgroundLiposome-integrated hydrogel hybrids: Promising platforms for cancer therapy and tissue regeneration
Sanati, M., & Yavari, S. A. (2024) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.03.008 · Cited by 77
Patel, K. H., Dunn, A. J., Talovic, M., Haas, G. J., Marcinczyk, M., Elmashhady, H., Kalaf, E. A. G., Sell, S. A., & Garg, K. (2019) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/ab0b06 · Cited by 74
Zhao, D., Du, C., Zuo, K., Zhao, Y., Xu, X., Li, Y., Tian, S. T., Yang, H., Lu, Y., Cheng, L., et al. (2022) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202202537 · Cited by 74
Pacelli, S., Manoharan, V., Desalvo, A., Lomis, N., Jodha, K. S., Prakash, S., & Paul, A. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c5tb01686j · Cited by 73
Biomaterial and stem cell‐based strategies for skeletal muscle regeneration
Dunn, A., Talović, M., Patel, K. H., Patel, A., Marcinczyk, M., & Garg, K. (2019) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.24212 · Cited by 67
“M1 macrophages promote the activation, migration, and proliferation of satellite cells.(34,160,177) M2 macrophages are needed to mitigate the immune response and support the differentiation and maturation of satellite cells into myotubes and myofibers.”
BackgroundThe effect of cell debris within biologic scaffolds upon the macrophage response
Londono, R., Dziki, J. L., Haljasmaa, E., Turner, N. J., Leifer, C. A., & Badylak, S. F. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36055 · Cited by 72
Self-citationSmith, E. L., Kanczler, J. M., Gothard, D., Roberts, C., Wells, J. A., White, L. J., Qutachi, O., Sawkins, M. J., Peto, H., Rashidi, H., et al. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.011 · Cited by 71
Piccoli, M., Urbani, L., Fallas, M. E. A., Franzin, C., Dedja, A., Bertin, E., Zuccolotto, G., Rosato, A., Pavan, P. G., Elvassore, N., et al. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.005 · Cited by 71
“Several works showed that the major effect of ECM application in skeletal muscle, both with same or different origin of recipient tissue, is to stimulate anti-inflammatory macrophages, leading to a constructive-type remodelling response [26,27].”
Zheng, J., Kong, Y., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Wei, X., & Ling, J. (2020) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-020-02039-1 · Cited by 69
“M1 macrophages exert proinflammatory functions through helper T (Th) type 1 (Th1)-associated immune reactions [7], whereas M2 macrophages enhance Th2-related reactions, downregulating inflammation [8].”
BackgroundPorzionato, A., Sfriso, M. M., Macchi, V., Rambaldo, A., Lago, G., Lancerotto, L., Vindigni, V., & De, R. (2013) · European Journal of Histochemistry · doi:10.4081/ejh.2013.e4 · Cited by 70
“23,48 Conversely, a preserved extracellular matrix may induce cell mitogenesis, chemotaxis and differentiation, favoring a before (A, C, E, G) and after (B, D, F, H l”
Yu, T., Wang, W., Nassiri, S., Kwan, T. D., Dang, C., Liu, W. X., & Spiller, K. L. (2016) · Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · doi:10.1080/09205063.2016.1155881 · Cited by 70
“In some studies, higher levels of M2 macrophages surrounding implanted biomaterials relative to M1 macrophages has been associated with more constructive remodeling [14, 15].”
BackgroundResultExtracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds for Building Gastrointestinal Tissue
Hussey, G. S., Cramer, M. C., & Badylak, S. F. (2017) · Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.09.004 · Cited by 75
Self-citationBarbeck, M., Motta, A., Migliaresi, C., Sader, R., Kirkpatrick, C. J., & Ghanaati, S. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35579 · Cited by 68
Marçal, H., Ahmed, T., Badylak, S. F., Tottey, S., & Foster, L. J. R. (2012) · Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.2217/rme.12.6 · Cited by 68
Self-citationYang, X., Wei, J., Lei, D., Liu, Y., & Wu, W. T. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.026 · Cited by 69
“In our study, we found dense structure is unfavorable to the infiltration of inflammatory cells at early stage, in contrast, both 1 and 2 min' electrospinning sheath maintained adequate porosity, which was proven to allow inflammatory, especially M2 cell infiltration, indicating constructive remodeling [22].”
ten Brink, T., Damanik, F., Rotmans, J. I., & Moroni, L. (2024) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202301939 · Cited by 71
Immunoengineering strategies to enhance vascularization and tissue regeneration
Zárubová, J., Hasani‐Sadrabadi, M. M., Ardehali, R., & Li, S. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114233 · Cited by 75
Hashizume, R., Hong, Y., Takanari, K., Fujimoto, K. L., Tobita, K., & Wagner, W. R. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.020 · Cited by 66
Injectable Silk Foams for Soft Tissue Regeneration
Bellas, E., Lo, T. J., Fournier, E., Brown, J. E., Abbott, R. D., Gil, E. S., Marra, K. G., Rubin, J. P., Leisk, G. G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2014) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201400506 · Cited by 67
Decellularized Periodontal Ligament Cell Sheets with Recellularization Potential
Farag, A., Vaquette, C., Theodoropoulos, C., Hamlet, S. M., Hutmacher, D. W., & Ivanovski, S. (2014) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034514547762 · Cited by 67
“…included the addition of DNase digestion as well as the bi-directional perfusion steps, which aimed to enhance the removal of cellular contents from the decellularized sheet, thus minimizing the possibility of eliciting an immune response upon future in vivo transplantation (Brown et al., 2009).”
BackgroundTurner, N. J., Pezzone, M. A., Brown, B. N., & Badylak, S. F. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.508 · Cited by 68
“These abdominal wall samples were obtained from previous studies in which the remodelling characteristics of the different implantation materials had already been demonstrated (Brown et al., 2009; Valentin et al., 2009, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationLu, W., Wang, N., Gao, P., Li, C. Y., Zhao, H., & Zhang, Z. T. (2014) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/cpr.12149 · Cited by 65
Hanson, S. E., King, S. N., Kim, J., Xia, C., Thibeault, S. L., & Hematti, P. (2011) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0716 · Cited by 66
“Others have shown that while biologic scaffolds can induce an anti-inflammatory macrophage expression, adding a differentiated cellular component will induce a proinflammatory or M1 phenotype in vivo.(40,41) It is often difficult to predict how the in vitro outcomes will manifest into physiological responses, particul…”
Ma, Y., Shi, H., Wei, Q.-S., Deng, Q., Sun, J.-H., Liu, Z., Lai, B., Li, G., Ding, Y., Niu, W., et al. (2021) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121192 · Cited by 64
Extracellular matrix scaffold-immune microenvironment modulates tissue regeneration
Yu, Y., Zhang, W., Liu, X., Wang, H., Shen, J., Xiao, H., Mei, J., Chai, Y., & Wen, G. (2021) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109524 · Cited by 63
Recovery of cardiac function mediated by MSC and interleukin-10 plasmid functionalised scaffold
Holladay, C. A., Duffy, A. M., Chen, X., Sefton, M. V., O’Brien, T., & Pandit, A. S. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.019 · Cited by 65
Prest, T. A., Yeager, E. A., LoPresti, S. T., Žygelytė, E., Martin, M. J., Dong, L., Gibson, A., Olutoye, O. O., Brown, B. N., & Cheetham, J. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36235 · Cited by 64
Self-citationZhang, L., Zhang, F., Weng, Z., Brown, B. N., Yan, H.-Q., Ma, X., Vosler, P. S., Badylak, S. F., Dixon, C. E., Cui, X. T., et al. (2013) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0622 · Cited by 63
“29,30 33 It is plausible that these properties may be generalized to other types of ECM materials, including ECM materials recently identified from CNS tissue.”
Self-citationBiomaterial strategies for generating therapeutic immune responses
Kelly, S. H., Shores, L. S., Votaw, N. L., & Collier, J. H. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.009 · Cited by 64
“sponses were associated with less scarring and greater constructive remodeling [122].”
Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Lü, Q., Gao, Y., Cai, Y., Sui, A., Su, T., Shen, X. P., & Xie, B. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3892/ijmm.2017.3022 · Cited by 63
“Some studies have found that decreased numbers of M1/M2 ratios correlate with biomaterial vascularization (14-18), while others have revealed that increased numbers of M1/M2 ratios contribute to enhanced vascularization (19-21).”
Bioscaffold-Induced Brain Tissue Regeneration
Modo, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01156 · Cited by 66
Biologic scaffolds for musculotendinous tissue repair
Turner, N. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2013) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v025a09 · Cited by 65
Self-citationNatural Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications
Ebhodaghe, S. O. (2021) · Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · doi:10.1080/09205063.2021.1958185 · Cited by 61
“Though research has previously demonstrated the application of cell secretome-based approaches for effective cartilage regeneration [179,180], chemical crosslinking can improve the stability of derived biomaterials [181].”
BackgroundHow to build a lung: latest advances and emerging themes in lung bioengineering
Santis, M. M. D., Bölükbas, D. A., Lindstedt, S., & Wagner, D. E. (2018) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01355-2016 · Cited by 62
“and regeneration or potential immunogenicity of the implanted scaffold [56, 57].”
BackgroundWang, Y., Yao, D., Li, L.-H., Qian, Z.-Y., He, W., Ding, R., Liu, H., & Fan, Y.-B. (2020) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00175 · Cited by 51
Dziki, J. L., Giglio, R. M., Sicari, B. M., Wang, D. S., Gandhi, R. M., Londono, R., Dearth, C. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2018) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0011 · Cited by 61
Self-citationNovel Sodium Deoxycholate-Based Chemical Decellularization Method for Peripheral Nerve
McCrary, M. W., Vaughn, N. E., Hlavac, N., Song, Y. H., Wachs, R. A., & Schmidt, C. E. (2020) · Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0135 · Cited by 61
Naturally derived biomaterials for addressing inflammation in tissue regeneration
Hortensius, R. A., & Harley, B. A. C. (2016) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1535370216648022 · Cited by 61
“This conservation of biomolecules lends these materials to be biocompatible in vivo, exhibiting a low immune response.(26,59) Also maintained within the scaffolds are the complex three-dimensional microstructure (important for directing cellular phenotype via geometric cues)(53) and growth factors that have roles in c…”
Automation of Pressure Control Improves Whole Porcine Heart Decellularization
Momtahan, N., Poornejad, N., Struk, J. A., Castleton, A. A., Herrod, B. J., Vance, B. R., Eatough, J. P., Roeder, B. L., Reynolds, P. R., & Cook, A. D. (2015) · Tissue Engineering Part C Methods · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0709 · Cited by 59
Rare earth-based materials for bone regeneration: Breakthroughs and advantages
Huang, Y., Zhai, X., Ma, T., Zhang, M., Pan, H., Lu, W. W., Zhao, X., Sun, T., Li, Y., Shen, J., et al. (2021) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214236 · Cited by 60
Extracellular Matrix Scaffold Technology for Bioartificial Pancreas Engineering
Salvatori, M., Katari, R., Patel, T. H., Peloso, A., Mugweru, J., Owusu, K., & Orlando, G. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296813519558 · Cited by 64
“Complete decellularization is essential as residual cellular material may contain antigenic epitopes that trigger inflammatory responses(83) and compromise subsequent recellularization.(84) Following decellularization, gamma irradiation,(85) ethylene oxide,(86) or paracetic acid(87) have been shown to effectively ster…”
BackgroundSelective recruitment of non-classical monocytes promotes skeletal muscle repair
Emeterio, C. L. S., Olingy, C. E., Chu, Y., & Botchwey, E. A. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.021 · Cited by 59
“Biomaterial-based therapies such as ECM-derived scaffolds and macrophage-polarizing hydrogels [23] can increase the ratio of anti-inflammatory to inflammatory macrophages [51, 52] and improve regenerative outcome, but the origin of the AAMs (whether resident or circulation-derived) remains unknown.”
Blaudez, F., Ivanovski, S., Hamlet, S. M., & Vaquette, C. (2019) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.08.002 · Cited by 59
Dalgliesh, A. J., Parvizi, M., Lopera-Higuita, M., Shklover, J., & Griffiths, L. G. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.016 · Cited by 57
Decellularized xenografts in regenerative medicine: From processing to clinical application
Capella‐Monsonís, H., & Zeugolis, D. I. (2021) · Xenotransplantation · doi:10.1111/xen.12683 · Cited by 57
Tan, J., Zhang, Q.-Y., Huang, L.-P., Huang, K., & Xie, H.-Q. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d1bm00470k · Cited by 57
Decellularized cartilage as a prospective scaffold for cartilage repair
Xia, C., Mei, S., Gu, C., Zheng, L., Chen, F., Shi, Y., Wu, K., Lu, T., Jin, Y., Lin, X., et al. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.002 · Cited by 57
Bioinspired Scaffold Designs for Regenerating Musculoskeletal Tissue Interfaces
Barajaa, M. A., Nair, L. S., & Laurencin, C. T. (2019) · Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40883-019-00132-3 · Cited by 57
“The continuous movement of the individual can cause a subsequent degradation to the newly formed fibrocartilage tissue followed by degradation to the adjacent tissues, resulting in impaired joint mobility, severe pain, and low quality of life, which necessitate the clinical intervention [171, 172].”
BackgroundJones, G. L., Herbert, A., Berry, H. E., Edwards, J. H., Fisher, J., & Ingham, E. (2016) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0114 · Cited by 56
“It has been well documented that acellular biological scaffolds derived from porcine tissues (such as the porcine intestinal submucosa) that have been used clinically in millions of patients stimulate a constructive remodeling response orchestrated by macrophages that have a regenerative wound healing phenotype (M2; m…”
BackgroundTrichinella spiralisimmunomodulation: an interactive multifactorial process
Ashour, D. S. (2013) · Expert Review of Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1586/1744666x.2013.811187 · Cited by 54
Dearth, C. L., Slivka, P. F., Stewart, S. A., Keane, T. J., Tay, J. K., Londoño, R., Goh, Q., Pizza, F. X., & Badylak, S. F. (2015) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.043 · Cited by 55
Self-citationRabbitt, D., Villapún, V. M., Carter, L. N., Man, K., Lowther, M., O’Kelly, P. L., Knowles, A. J., Mottura, A., Tang, Y. T., Luerti, L., et al. (2024) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202403129 · Cited by 60
Biologic Scaffold for CNS Repair
Meng, F., Modo, M., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.2217/rme.14.9 · Cited by 54
Self-citationActivation of Macrophages in Response to Biomaterials
Rayahin, J., & Gemeinhart, R. A. (2017) · Results and problems in cell differentiation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54090-0_13 · Cited by 58
de Kort, B. J., Koch, S. E., Wissing, T. B., Krebber, M. M., Bouten, C. V. C., & Smits, A. I. P. M. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113960 · Cited by 58
Boccafoschi, F., Botta, M., Fusaro, L., Copes, F., Ramella, M., & Cannas, M. F. (2015) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.2103 · Cited by 53
Carruthers, C. A., Dearth, C. L., Reing, J. E., Kramer, C. R., Gagne, D. H., Crapo, P. M., Garcia, O., Badhwar, A., Scott, J. R., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0095 · Cited by 53
“13,40,41 Thus, it is plausible and logical that the disparate host response to AlloDerm and AlloMax could be due, at least in part, to differences in decellularization (i.e., the amount of cellular debris remaining) and/or changes in the composition and structure.”
Self-citationThe host response in tissue engineering: Crosstalk between immune cells and cell-laden scaffolds
Saleh, L. S., & Bryant, S. J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cobme.2018.03.006 · Cited by 54
Angelis, B. D., Orlandi, F., D’Autilio, M. F. L. M., Scioli, M. G., Orlandi, A., Cervelli, V., & Gentile, P. (2018) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.12912 · Cited by 53
Buckenmeyer, M. J., Meder, T. J., Prest, T. A., & Brown, B. N. (2019) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.07.023 · Cited by 56
Self-citationIn vivo degradation of 14C-labeled porcine dermis biologic scaffold
Carey, L. E., Dearth, C. L., Johnson, S. A., Londoño, R., Medberry, C. J., Daly, K. A., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.015 · Cited by 53
Self-citationTran, T.-H., Krishnan, S., & Amiji, M. M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152024 · Cited by 52
“On the other hand, in the wound-healing environment or in the presence of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4 or IL-10, macrophages shift to a predominant M2 phenotype with high secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4, IL-10, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) for tissue repair and re-modeling [4,5].”
BackgroundProcessing and production of bioresorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering
Walker, J. L., & Santoro, M. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100262-9.00009-4 · Cited by 54
Gu, B., Kaneko, T., Zaw, S. Y. M., Sone, P. P., Murano, H., Sueyama, Y., Zaw, Z. C. T., & Okiji, T. (2018) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.13033 · Cited by 51
Brown, B. N., Haschak, M. J., Lopresti, S. T., & Stahl, E. C. (2017) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.05.001 · Cited by 55
Self-citationInvolvement of the Innate Immune System in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Kotlyarov, S. N. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23020985 · Cited by 54
Engineering biomaterials to tailor the microenvironment for macrophage–endothelium interactions
Guan, Y., Racioppi, L., & Gerecht, S. (2023) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00591-9 · Cited by 52
“In an in vivo study, rapidly degradable ECM scaffolds induced pro-regenerative polarization and constructive vascularization, whereas nondegradable or slowly degradable scaffolds caused chronic inflammation 106,107 .”
BackgroundPreparation and characterization of a biologic scaffold and hydrogel derived from colonic mucosa
Keane, T. J., Dziki, J. L., Castelton, A., Faulk, D. M., Messerschmidt, V. L., Londoño, R., Reing, J. E., Velankar, S., & Badylak, S. F. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33556 · Cited by 52
Self-citationvan der Veen, V. C., Boekema, B. K. H. L., Ulrich, M. M. W., & Middelkoop, E. (2011) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2011.00713.x · Cited by 51
“The removal of cellular components shifts the macrophage response to the immunomodulatory M2 response, resulting in constructive tissue remodeling.(4) Because cell remnants are difficult to remove, biological materials are often used as temporary biological dressings rather than as permanent dermal substitutes.”
BackgroundLong-Term Evaluation of Functional Outcomes Following Rat Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury and Repair
Mintz, E. L., Passipieri, J. A., Franklin, I. R., Toscano, V. M., Afferton, E. C., Sharma, P. R., & Christ, G. J. (2019) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0126 · Cited by 50
“8), indicative of a chronic remodeling response.(42,43)”
Polymeric materials for immune engineering: Molecular interaction to biomaterial design
Soni, S. S., & Rodell, C. B. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.016 · Cited by 52
Effects of aging upon the host response to implants
Hachim, D., Wang, N., Lopresti, S. T., Stahl, E. C., Umeda, Y. U., Rege, R. D., Carey, S. T., Mani, D., & Brown, B. N. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36013 · Cited by 52
Self-citationCrum, R. J., Hall, K., Molina, C. P., Hussey, G. S., Graham, E., Li, H., & Badylak, S. F. (2022) · npj Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41536-022-00208-9 · Cited by 50
Self-citationGuan, Y. S., Liu, S., Sun, C., Cheng, G., Kong, F., Luan, Y., Xie, X., Zhao, S., Zhang, D., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5304 · Cited by 51
3D Culture of MIN-6 Cells on Decellularized Pancreatic Scaffold: In Vitro and In Vivo Study
Wu, D., Wan, J., Huang, Y. H., Guo, Y., Xu, T., Zhu, M., Fan, X., Zhu, S., Ling, C., Li, X., et al. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/432645 · Cited by 50
Human Testis Extracellular Matrix Enhances Human Spermatogonial Stem Cell Survival In Vitro
Murdock, M. H., David, S., Swinehart, I. T., Reing, J. E., Tran, K., Gassei, K., Orwig, K. E., & Badylak, S. F. (2018) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0147 · Cited by 51
Self-citationFast cyclical-decellularized trachea as a natural 3D scaffold for organ engineering
Giraldo‐Gómez, D. M., García-López, S. J., de Dios, L. T., Sánchez‐Sánchez, R., Villalba-Caloca, J., Sotres-Vega, A., Prado-Audelo, M. L. D., Gómez-Lizárraga, K. K., Garciadiego-Cázares, D., & Piña-Barba, M. C. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110142 · Cited by 49
Extracellular Matrix Powder Protects Against Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis
Manni, M. L., Czajka, C. A., Oury, T. D., & Gilbert, T. W. (2011) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0023 · Cited by 48
“20 Within the lung, the M2 macrophage phenotype has been reported to be associated with the onset of fibrosis.”
Smits, A. I. P. M., & Bouten, C. V. C. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cobme.2018.02.006 · Cited by 48
Wachesk, C. C., Seabra, S. H., dos Santos, T. A. T., Trava-Airoldi, V. J., Lobo, A. O., & Marciano, F. R. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10856-021-06596-6 · Cited by 50
Zhen, L., Creason, S. A., Simonovsky, F. I., Snyder, J. M., Lindhartsen, S. L., Mecwan, M. M., Johnson, B. W., Himmelfarb, J., & Ratner, B. D. (2021) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121174 · Cited by 51
Elsaesser, A. F., Bermueller, C., Schwarz, S., Körber, L., Breiter, R., & Rotter, N. (2013) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0365 · Cited by 47
“Recently, experimental evidence has been provided that unseeded biological scaffolds evoke the attraction of an M2 phenotype macrophage as opposed to seeded scaffolds, which attract predominantly an M1 phenotype.(49) The M2 phenotype is mainly responsible for tissue remodeling, including collagen turn-over, while the…”
The proangiogenic potential of a novel calcium releasing biomaterial: Impact on cell recruitment
Oliveira, H., Catros, S., Boiziau, C., Siadous, R., Martí-Muñoz, J., Bareille, R., Rey, S., Castaño, Ó., Planell, J. A., Amédée, J., et al. (2015) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.003 · Cited by 46
Cantu, D. A., Hematti, P., & Kao, W. J. (2012) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.5966/sctm.2012-0061 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, B. N., Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., McCabe, G. P., & Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1482-1491
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2805023
- OpenAlex
- W1999579326
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 36.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (F31EB007914)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- macrophage phenotype, macrophage polarization, tissue remodeling, extracellular matrix scaffolds, acellular scaffolds, cellular scaffolds, host tissue response, scar formation, connective tissue deposition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Nucleus, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Indoles, Macrophages, Phenotype, Transplantation, Autologous, Transplantation, Heterologous, Transplantation, Homologous, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Prosthesis Implantation, Sus scrofa, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
