The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component
Open accessAbstract
Recently, macrophages have been characterized as having an M1 or M2 phenotype based on receptor expression, cytokine and effector molecule production, and function. The effects of macrophage phenotype upon tissue remodeling following the implantation of a biomaterial are largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of a cellular component within an implanted extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold upon macrophage phenotype, and to determine the relationship between macrophage phenotype and tissue remodeling. Partial-thickness defects in the abdominal wall musculature of Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with autologous body wall tissue, acellular allogeneic rat body wall ECM, xenogeneic pig urinary bladder tissue, or acellular xenogeneic pig urinary bladder ECM. At 3, 7, 14, and 28 days the host tissue response was characterized using histologic, immunohistochemical, and RT-PCR methods. The acellular test articles were shown to elicit a predominantly M2 type response and resulted in constructive remodeling, while those containing a cellular component, even an autologous cellular component, elicited a predominantly M1 type response and resulted in deposition of dense connective tissue and/or scarring. We conclude that the presence of cellular material within an ECM scaffold modulates the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response following implantation, and that the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response appears to be related to tissue remodeling outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“What is more, it is widely accepted that during the degradation of implanted ECM bioscaffolds, ECM components are released into the environment and promote the transition to a remodeling phase [18,44,74,78].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mechanistically, inadequate decellularization retains high amounts of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) or endotoxin, and excessive crosslinking biases macrophages toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes that drive fibrosis and poor remodeling [73,74].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Immunohistochemical and gene expression analysis using CCR7 and iNOS for M1 and CD163 and Arg for M2 macrophages revealed that cellular scaffolds had a majority of M1 phenotype and provided a dense, poorly organized collagenous FBC, while decellularized scaffolds favored the M2 phenotype, and displayed both neomatrix formation and early angiogenesis.”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [180]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Recognition of the predominant MΦ phenotypic profile can provide a tool by which a tissue regenerative outcome can be predicted and possibly promoted [4].”
From Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Brown et al. [83], who demonstrated that the presence of even an autologous cellular component attracted M1 cells, which was not observed in cell free constructs.”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“Briefly, scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) have been shown to promote a switch from a predominantly M1 cell population immediately following implantation to a population enriched in M2 cells by 7–14 days post implantation [154–156].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“This constructive remodeling response has been directly linked to the ability of the material to modulate macrophage phenotype [154–157].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“Here we find that MΦ activation depends on biomaterial architecture in addition to previously implicated biomaterial chemistry and bioactivity (34–36).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Previous in vivo studies demonstrated concurrent expression of M1 and M2 markers (37), and enhanced expression of M2 markers has been associated with improved outcomes for implanted biologic scaffolds (34).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodAnalyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method
Schmittgen, T. D., & Livak, K. J. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.73 · Cited by 26,190 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodThe chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534 · cited 3×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundMANTOVANI, A., SOZZANI, S., LOCATI, M., ALLAVENA, P., & SICA, A. (2002) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02302-5 · Cited by 5,528
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
BackgroundMutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287 · cited 2×
“Polarized macrophages are referred to as either M1 or M2 cells, mimicking the Th1/Th2 nomenclature [9].”
BackgroundMartínez, F. O., Gordon, S., Locati, M., & Mantovani, A. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303 · Cited by 2,399 · cited 1×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundDecellularization of tissues and organs
Gilbert, T. W., Sellaro, T. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 · Cited by 2,222 · cited 2×
“The decellularization methods used to process ECM scaffolds may alter these molecules such that they can no longer negatively influence the host response or there may be a threshold amount required to alter the host response to an ECM scaffold [25].”
MethodSelf-citationThe many faces of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M. (2003) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0602325 · Cited by 1,902 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 896
Efficient decellularization of rabbit trachea to generate a tissue engineering scaffold biomatrix
Hong, P., Bezuhly, M., Graham, M. E., & Gratzer, P. F. (2018) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.06.032 · Cited by 32
Tavakoli, S., Kisiel, M. A., Biedermann, T., & Klar, A. S. (2022) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-213624 · Cited by 31
Bullers, S. J., Baker, S. C., Ingham, E., & Southgate, J. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0628 · Cited by 31
Rutledge, K., & Cheng, Q. (2016) · Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology · doi:10.4172/2157-7439.1000350 · Cited by 31
“Furthermore, scaffolds composed of natural ECM can switch macrophage phenotype to predominantly wound healing by 7-14 days after implantation [67-69].”
BackgroundPadalino, M. A., Castaldi, B., Fedrigo, M., Gallo, M., Zucchetta, F., Vida, V. L., Milanesi, O., Angelini, A., & Stellin, G. (2016) · Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2016.04.015 · Cited by 31
Hashemi, J., Pasalar, P., Soleimani, M., Arefian, E., Khorramirouz, R., Akbarzadeh, A., Ghorbani, F., Enderami, S. E., & Kajbafzadeh, A. M. (2018) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000487230 · Cited by 32
“The absence of any nuclear material was very promising, as remnants of DNA fragments in a decellularized scaffold can cause cytocompatibility in vitro and immunological responses after implantation [Brown et al., 2009; Nagata et al., 2010].”
BackgroundIn Vivo Response of Acellular Porcine Pericardial for Tissue Engineered Transcatheter Aortic Valves
Khorramirouz, R., Go, J. L., Noble, C., Morse, D. W., Lerman, A., & Young, M. D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37550-2 · Cited by 30
Filament-anchored hydrogel layer on polypropylene hernia mesh with robust anti-inflammatory effects
Qiao, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.013 · Cited by 32
Zhao, B., He, J., Wang, F., Xing, R., Sun, B., & Zhou, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Materials · doi:10.3389/fmats.2021.758599 · Cited by 30
“However, the lack of donor sources and immune rejection limit the clinical applications (Brown et al., 2009; Oryan et al., 2014).”
BackgroundWang, H., Xing, M., Deng, W., Qian, M., Wang, F., Wang, K., Midgley, A. C., & Zhao, Q. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.007 · Cited by 30
Bera, A. K., Yeleswarapu, S., & Pati, F. (2022) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.202200109 · Cited by 31
Red blood cell membrane-functionalized Nanofibrous tubes for small-diameter vascular grafts
Zhang, C., Cha, R., Wang, C., Chen, X., Li, Z., Xie, Q., Jia, L., Sun, Y., Hu, Z., Zhang, L., et al. (2023) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122124 · Cited by 30
Daly, K. A., Wolf, M. T., Johnson, S. A., & Badylak, S. F. (2011) · Tissue Engineering Part C Methods · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0699 · Cited by 31
“18,30,41 In addition, macrophages have a role in myogenesis following injury, with classically activated macrophages (i.e., the M1 phenotype) being important in debris phagocytosis and the alternatively activated macrophage (M2 phenotype) necessary for myogenesis.”
Self-citationLung protection by inhalation of exogenous solubilized extracellular matrix
Wu, J., Ravikumar, P., Nguyen, K. T., Hsia, C. C. W., & Hong, Y. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171165 · Cited by 33
Bank, R. A., Zandstra, J., Room, H., Petersen, A. H., & van Putten, S. M. (2017) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0499 · Cited by 30
Rajabi, S., Jalili‐Firoozinezhad, S., Ashtiani, M. K., Carrou, G. L., Tajbakhsh, S., & Baharvand, H. (2017) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.2479 · Cited by 30
Lucke, S., Hoene, A., Walschus, U., Kob, A., Pissarek, J.-W., & Schlosser, M. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/938059 · Cited by 33
“M1 macrophages act as effector cells in TH1 cellular immune response, whereasM2 macrophages are involved in wound healing, tissue repair, and immunosuppression [5, 6, 24, 25].”
BackgroundResultBiomaterials in Regenerative Medicine and the Immune System
Santambrogio, L. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18045-8 · Cited by 30
Borax-loaded injectable alginate hydrogels promote muscle regeneration in vivo after an injury
Ciriza, J., Rodríguez-Romano, A., Nogueroles, I., Ferrer, G. G., Martín‐Cabezuelo, R., Pedraz, J. L., & Rico, P. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2021.112003 · Cited by 29
Matrix-Bound Nanovesicles: What Are They and What Do They Do?
Piening, L. M., & Wachs, R. A. (2022) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000522575 · Cited by 28
“Prior work demonstrated that decellularized tissue scaffolds altered macrophage phenotype away from an M1 phenotype, even towards an M2 phenotype [Brown et al., 2009, 2012; Sicari et al., 2014; Keane et al., 2017].”
BackgroundDeveloping Extracellular Matrix Technology to Treat Retinal or Optic Nerve Injury
Ren, T., van der Merwe, Y., & Steketee, M. B. (2015) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0077-15.2015 · Cited by 30
Kajbafzadeh, A. M., Sabetkish, S., Sabetkish, N., Muhammadnejad, S., Akbarzadeh, A., Tavangar, S. M., Mohseni, M. J., & Amanpour, S. (2014) · Surgery Today · doi:10.1007/s00595-014-0993-2 · Cited by 29
Tissue Engineering in Animal Models for Urinary Diversion: A Systematic Review
Sloff, M., de Vries, R., Geutjes, P., IntHout, J., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. J., Oosterwijk, E., & Feitz, W. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098734 · Cited by 29
Nowotny, J., Aibibu, D., Farack, J., Nimtschke, U., Hild, M., Gelinsky, M., Kasten, P., & Cherif, C. (2016) · Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · doi:10.1080/09205063.2016.1155879 · Cited by 29
Correia, C. R., Gaifem, J., Oliveira, M. B., Silvestre, R., & Mano, J. F. (2017) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c6bm00920d · Cited by 29
Mueller, C. K., & Schultze–Mosgau, S. (2009) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.009 · Cited by 29
Advances focusing on the application of decellularization methods in tendon-bone healing
Zhong, S., Lan, Y., Liu, J., Tam, M. S., Hou, Z., Zheng, Q., Fu, S., & Bao, D. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2024.01.020 · Cited by 30
Decellularization and Their Significance for Tissue Regeneration in the Era of 3D Bioprinting
Gadre, M. A., Kasturi, M., Agarwal, P., & Vasanthan, K. S. (2024) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c08930 · Cited by 34
A porous collagen‐GAG scaffold promotes muscle regeneration following volumetric muscle loss injury
Panayi, A. C., Smit, L., Hays, N. M., Udeh, K., Endo, Y., Li, B., Sakthivel, D., Tamayol, A., Neppl, R. L., Orgill, D. P., et al. (2019) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12768 · Cited by 28
“Materials such as decellularized tissue have shown successful vital tissue formation, but studies have also shown unfavorable scar tissue formation and insufficient improvement in recovery following implantation.(17,18,22) One scaffold of potential interest is the collagen-GAG scaffold (CGS), a bilayer consisting of a…”
BackgroundWang, X., Zhang, H., Guo, R., Li, X., Liu, H., Wang, Z., Du, Q., Tong, D., & Huang, Y. (2021) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107783 · Cited by 28
Vakilzadeh, H., Varshosaz, J., Dinari, M., Mirian, M., Hajhashemi, V., Shamaeizadeh, N., & Hamid, M. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.111 · Cited by 28
Fishman, J. M., Wiles, K., & Wood, K. J. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800196-7.00008-6 · Cited by 31
Protein turnover during in vitro tissue engineering
Li, Q., Chang, Z., de Oliveira, G. A. R., Xiong, M., Smith, L. M., Frey, B. L., & Welham, N. V. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.004 · Cited by 29
“We observed ongoing degradation of these remnant proteins during the 6 w culture period, which theoretically corresponds to a decrease in the immunogenic potential of the final engineered tissue[57, 58].”
Osteoinductive micro-nano guided bone regeneration membrane for in situ bone defect repair
Wang, B., Xie, X., Jiang, W., Zhan, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, Z., Guo, N., Guo, K., & Sun, J. (2024) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-024-03745-w · Cited by 27
“On the other hand, M2 macrophages release anti-inflammatory factors such as interleukin 10 (IL10) and interleukin 4 (IL4), promoting tissue regeneration [22].”
BackgroundEDC Cross-linking of Decellularized Tissue: A Promising Approach?
Lehmann, N., Christ, T., Daugs, A., Bloch, O., & Holinski, S. (2017) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0416 · Cited by 30
“35,36 A major factor in the degradation of heart valve prostheses and tissue failure is calcification.”
Kim, W.-J., Kwon, D. R., Lee, H., Lee, J., Moon, Y. S., Lee, S. C., & Kim, G. (2024) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.10.002 · Cited by 36
Preventive midline laparotomy closure with a new bioabsorbable mesh: An experimental study
Cano, M. L., Armengol, M., Quiles, M., Biel, A., Velasco, J., Huguet, P., Mestre, A., Delgado, L. M., Gil, F. X., & Arbos, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.041 · Cited by 27
“[32] Brown BN, Valentin JE, Stewart-Akers AM, McCabe GP, Badylak SF.”
BackgroundMcGarvey, J. R., Pettaway, S., Shuman, J. A., Novack, C. P., Zellars, K. N., Freels, P. D., Echols, R. L., Burdick, J. A., Gorman, J. H., Gorman, R. C., et al. (2014) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.114.215798 · Cited by 27
“Isolated macrophage cytokine mRNA levels for TNF, IL-8, MCP-1, and MIP-1A were differentially affected within the MI region with CHAM injections, whereby mRNA levels were increased in the MI/CHAM group at 7 days post-MI.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialYu, H., Chen, Y., Kong, H., He, Q., Sun, H., Bhugul, P. A., Zhang, Q., Chen, B., & Zhou, M. (2018) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-018-0096-5 · Cited by 27
Endochondral Bone Regeneration by Non-autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Longoni, A., Pennings, I., Cuenca, M., van Rijen, M. H. P., Peperzak, V., Rosenberg, A. J. W. P., Levato, R., & Gawlitta, D. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00651 · Cited by 25
“Furthermore, the presence of iNOS positive macrophages usually correlates with poor regenerative outcomes (Brown et al., 2009).”
BackgroundPost-Stroke Timing of ECM Hydrogel Implantation Affects Biodegradation and Tissue Restoration
Damian, C., Ghuman, H., Mauney, C., Azar, R. M., Reinartz, J., Badylak, S. F., & Modo, M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222111372 · Cited by 25
Self-citationMueller, C. K., & Schultze–Mosgau, S. (2010) · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.025 · Cited by 27
Wool Keratin 3D Scaffolds with Light-Triggered Antimicrobial Activity
Ferroni, C., Sotgiu, G., Sagnella, A., Varchi, G., Guerrini, A., Giuri, D., Polo, E., Orlandi, V. T., Marras, E., Gariboldi, M. B., et al. (2016) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00697 · Cited by 27
Zhang, S., Xu, K., Ge, L., Darabi, M. A., Xie, F., Derakhshanfar, S., Liu, Y., Xing, M. M. Q., & Wei, H. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra10014g · Cited by 27
Lindberg, G. C. J., Longoni, A., Lim, K. S., Rosenberg, A. J. W. P., Hooper, G. J., Gawlitta, D., & Woodfield, T. B. F. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.022 · Cited by 27
Al‐Maawi, S., Rother, S., Halfter, N., Fiebig, K. M., Moritz, J., Moeller, S. J., Schnabelrauch, M., Kirkpatrick, C. J., Sader, R., Wiesmann, H., et al. (2021) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.008 · Cited by 27
“During regeneration, the polarization of macrophages towards these phenotypes may change according to the inflammatory pattern of their microenvironment [20].”
BackgroundSurfactant-Free Decellularization of Porcine Aortic Tissue by Subcritical Dimethyl Ether
Kanda, H., Ando, D., Hoshino, R., Yamamoto, T., Diono, W., Suzuki, S., Shinohara, S., & Goto, M. (2021) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c01549 · Cited by 26
Parchehbaf‐Kashani, M., Ansari, H., Mahmoudi, E., Barekat, M., Sepantafar, M., Rajabi, S., & Pahlavan, S. (2021) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.1c00133 · Cited by 26
Nellinger, S., Mršić, I., Keller, S., Heine, S., Southan, A., Bach, M., Volz, A., Chassé, T., & Kluger, P. J. (2022) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.28047 · Cited by 28
“It is known that remaining DNA can contribute to cytocompatibility problems and immunogenic reactions upon reintroduction of cells (B. N. Brown et al., 2009).”
BackgroundKoch, H., Hammer, N., Oßmann, S., Schierle, K., Sack, U., Hofmann, J., Wecks, M., & Boldt, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00089 · Cited by 26
“In contrast, M2-activated macrophages (CD163+) are able to facilitate tissue repair and constructive remodeling (Mantovani et al., 2005; Brown et al., 2009; Chin et al., 2011).”
BackgroundEnayati, M., Eilenberg, M., Grasl, C., Riedl, P., Kaun, C., Meßner, B., Walter, I., Liska, R., Schima, H., Wojta, J., et al. (2016) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1601-y · Cited by 28
Ocular Surface Repair Using Decellularized Porcine Conjunctiva
Zhao, L., Jia, Y., Zhao, C., Li, H., Wang, F., Dong, M., Liu, T., Zhang, S., Zhou, Q., & Shi, W. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.006 · Cited by 26
Extracellular Matrix for Myocardial Repair
Dziki, J. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2018) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97421-7_8 · Cited by 25
Self-citationDynamic reciprocity in cell–scaffold interactions
Mauney, J. R., & Adam, R. M. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.016 · Cited by 27
Decellularized Renal Matrix and Regenerative Medicine of the Kidney: A Different Point of View
Petrosyan, A., Zanusso, I., Lavarreda-Pearce, M., Leslie, S., Sedrakyan, S., Filippo, R. E. D., Orlando, G., Sacco, S. D., & Perin, L. (2015) · Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0368 · Cited by 25
“41 PDGF, in addition to mediating mesangioproliferative and renal interstitial fibrosis, 42 along with VEGF and TGF-a , also directs neoangiogenesis.”
Towards rebuilding vaginal support utilizing an extracellular matrix bioscaffold
Liang, R., Knight, K. M., Easley, D. C., Palcsey, S. L., Abramowitch, S. D., & Moalli, P. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.015 · Cited by 25
“ECM bioscaffolds are designed to degrade and to be gradually replaced by normal host tissue [45, 46][47–50][51].”
BackgroundMora‐Navarro, C., Garcia, M. E., Sarker, P., Ozpinar, E. W., Enders, J. R., Khan, S. A., Branski, R. C., & Freytes, D. O. (2021) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/ac361f · Cited by 25
“Given the known ability of ECM scaffolds to modulate macrophage polarization [45], we tested the effects of auVFLP hydrogel upon in vitro polarization when challenged with LPS.”
MethodEvren, S., Loai, Y., Antoon, R., Islam, S. S., Yeger, H., Moore, K., Wong, K. K. W., Gorczynski, R. M., & Farhat, W. A. (2010) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000317332 · Cited by 26
“M2 macrophage polarization has been associated with degradation and healing during ACM implantation [Badylak et al., 2008; Brown et al., 2009; Valentin et al., 2009].”
BackgroundKeeler, G. D., Durdik, J. M., & Stenken, J. A. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.022 · Cited by 25
Muhamed, J., Revi, D., Rajan, A., Geetha, S., & Anilkumar, T. V. (2014) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623314550722 · Cited by 25
“Biologic scaffold materials induce constructive tissue remodeling by inducing M2 macrophage response (Brown et al. 2009).”
BackgroundMethodRoch, T., Akymenko, O., Krüger, A., Jung, F., Ma, N., & Lendlein, A. (2014) · Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation · doi:10.3233/ch-141885 · Cited by 27
Decellularized tongue tissue as an in vitro model for studying tongue cancer and tongue regeneration
Zhao, L., Huang, L., Yu, S., Zheng, J., Wang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.062 · Cited by 26
Despeyroux, A., Duret, C., Gondeau, C., Pérez-Gracia, E., Chuttoo, L., de Boussac, H., Briolotti, P., Bony, C., Noël, D., Jørgensen, C., et al. (2017) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.2607 · Cited by 25
Pilipović, I., Stojić-Vukanić, Z., Prijić, I., Jasnic, N. I., & Leposavić, G. (2019) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104665 · Cited by 27
“Similarly, the frequency of noradrenaline-synthesizing (“noradrenergic”) cells in the target tissues increases with the development of collagen-induced arthritis (Capellino et al., 2012).”
BackgroundLindner, C., Pröhl, A., Abels, M., LÖFFLER, T., Batinic, M., Jung, O., & Barbeck, M. (2020) · In Vivo · doi:10.21873/invivo.12148 · Cited by 25
Polymer-Based Reconstruction of the Inferior Vena Cava in Rat: Stem Cells or RGD Peptide?
Pontailler, M., Illangakoon, U. E., Williams, G. R., Marijon, C., Bellamy, V., Balvay, D., Autret, G., Vanneaux, V., Larghero, J., Planat‐Benard, V., et al. (2015) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0254 · Cited by 24
“From this standpoint, PDO and PHVBB outperformed PU with regard to the predominance of infiltrating regulatory ED2 macrophages, a phenotype associated with less inflammatory tissue scarring and improved remodelling.(35,36) The enhanced ED2 response to PDO and PHBVV is consistent with our concurrent findings of higher…”
Tolouei, A. E., Dülger, N., Ghatee, R., & Kennedy, S. M. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201800227 · Cited by 26
The Effect of Laminin-111 Hydrogels on Muscle Regeneration in a Murine Model of Injury
Marcinczyk, M., Dunn, A., Haas, G., Madsen, J., Scheidt, R., Patel, K. H., Talović, M., & Garg, K. (2019) · Tissue Engineering. Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0200 · Cited by 24
Bioactive Medications for the Delivery of Platelet Derivatives to Skin Wounds
Bonferoni, M. C., Rossi, S., Sandri, G., Caramella, C. M., Fante, C. D., Perotti, C. G., Miele, D., Vigani, B., & Ferrari, F. (2019) · Current Drug Delivery · doi:10.2174/1381612825666190320154406 · Cited by 24
Yu, Y., Cui, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, D., Yin, J., Wen, G., & Chai, Y. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c9tb02910a · Cited by 25
Engineering Vascularized Composite Allografts Using Natural Scaffolds: A Systematic Review
Lupon, E. L., Lellouch, A. G., Acun, A., Andrews, A. R., Oganesyan, R. V., Goutard, M. P., Taveau, C. B., Lantieri, L. A., Cetrulo, C. L., & Uygun, B. E. (2021) · Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2021.0102 · Cited by 32
“12,51–56 Indeed, Zhang et al. advocates that hASCs and decellularized skin flaps worked synergistically to activate M2 macrophage polarization and provide a proregenerative environment for adipose tissue formation.”
Research Progress on the Immunogenicity and Regeneration of Acellular Adipose Matrix: A Mini Review
Liu, K., He, Y., & Lu, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.881523 · Cited by 24
“Within 1–6 days following transplantation, M1 macrophage initiates vascularization in the graft via pro-inflammatory signaling, which involves the upregulated levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-23 and TNF-α (Brown et al., 2009).”
BackgroundLister, Z., Rayner, K. J., & Suuronen, E. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2016.00062 · Cited by 25
“One study using a rat abdominal defect model compared the effects of an autologous cellular and acellular patch or a cellular and acellular patch derived from the bladder of a xenogeneic pig (Brown et al., 2009).”
MethodLoPresti, S. T., Popovic, B., Kulkarni, M., Skillen, C. D., & Brown, B. N. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119376 · Cited by 24
Self-citationHachim, D., LoPresti, S. T., Rege, R. D., Umeda, Y. U., Iftikhar, A., Nolfi, A. L., Skillen, C. D., & Brown, B. N. (2020) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm00568a · Cited by 23
Self-citationChen, S., Chu, C., Wang, C., Yang, Y., Xu, Z.-Y., Qu, Y., & Man, Y. (2024) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122685 · Cited by 23
Chen, X., Zhou, L., Wu, D., Huang, W., Lin, Y., Zhou, B., & Chen, J. (2020) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2020/2327034 · Cited by 23
Garg, K., Ward, C., & Corona, B. T. (2015) · Inflammation and Cell Signaling · doi:10.14800/ics.530 · Cited by 30
Potential Synergistic Effects of Stem Cells and Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds
Gaffney, L. S., Wrona, E. A., & Freytes, D. O. (2017) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00083 · Cited by 23
D’Amore, A., Fazzari, M., Jiang, H., Luketich, S. K., Luketich, M. E., Hoff, R., Jacobs, D. L., Gu, X., Badylak, S. F., Freeman, B. Α., et al. (2017) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0349 · Cited by 23
“This scaffold was utilized to repair a rat abdominal wall partial thickness defect, 25,26 hypothesizing that the NO 2 -OA release would facilitate increased angiogenesis by 8 weeks.”
Self-citationLim, T., Tang, Q., Zhu, Z., Feng, Y., Zhan, S., Wei, X., & Zhang, C. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d0tb00483a · Cited by 23
Lucke, S., Walschus, U., Hoene, A., Schnabelrauch, M., Nebe, J. B., Finke, B., & Schlosser, M. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36500 · Cited by 25
Yi, P., Chen, S.-X., Zhao, Y., Ku, W., Lu, H., Yu, D.-S., & Zhao, W. (2024) · Biomaterials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213883 · Cited by 24
Sericin as a next-generation biomaterial: Properties, applications, and future prospects
Mohanty, S., Mishra, A., Gupta, N., Varunteja, B., Mukherjee, T., Pradhan, P., Kumari, A., Nayak, N., Sahu, A., Prabhakar, P. K., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145393 · Cited by 22
Hachim, D., Iftikhar, A., LoPresti, S. T., Nolfi, A. L., Ravichandar, S., Skillen, C. D., & Brown, B. N. (2019) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.020 · Cited by 22
“These improved outcomes can include enhanced integration, new site-appropriate and functional tissue formation, depending upon the material and location of the implant [15-20].”
BackgroundSelf-citationLiu, X.-N., Chen, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.18240/ijo.2021.03.19 · Cited by 22
Mahon, O. R., Browe, D. C., Díaz‐Payno, P. J., Pitacco, P., Cunningham, K. T., Mills, K. H. G., Dunne, A., & Kelly, D. J. (2021) · Journal of Immunology and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.regen.2021.100041 · Cited by 21
Rohringer, S., Schneider, K. H., Eder, G., Hager, P., Enayati, M., Kapeller, B., Kiss, H., Windberger, U. B., Podesser, B. K., & Bergmeister, H. (2022) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100262 · Cited by 22
Thomson, K. S., Dupras, S. K., Murry, C. E., Scatena, M., & Regnier, M. (2013) · Angiogenesis · doi:10.1007/s10456-013-9388-z · Cited by 22
“An increase in M2 macrophage phenotype has also been associated with improved tissue remodeling and host response to implanted scaffolds [45].”
Host Response to Implanted Materials and Devices: An Overview
Scarritt, M. E., Londoño, R., & Badylak, S. F. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45433-7_1 · Cited by 21
Self-citationDecellularized ECM-Derived Hydrogels: Modification and Properties
Claudio‐Rizo, J. A., Delgado, J., Quintero‐Ortega, I. A., Mata‐Mata, J. L., & Mendoza‐Novelo, B. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.78331 · Cited by 22
“The intensity of the host immune response after implantation is heavily influenced by the residual material, which acts as like cell signals [74, 75].”
BackgroundDaood, U., & Yiu, C. K. Y. (2018) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.018 · Cited by 21
“[35] Brown BN, Valentin JE, Stewart-Akers AM, McCabe GP, Badylak SF.”
MethodTissue-derived decellularized extracellular matrices toward cartilage repair and regeneration
Das, P., Singh, Y. P., Mandal, B. B., & Nandi, S. K. (2019) · Methods in cell biology · doi:10.1016/bs.mcb.2019.11.005 · Cited by 22
Extracellular Matrix as an Inductive Scaffold for Functional Tissue Reconstruction
Brown, B. N., & Badylak, S. F. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800548-4.00002-4 · Cited by 21
Self-citationStrategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: seed vs. soil
Sicari, B. M., Londoño, R., & Badylak, S. F. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c5tb01714a · Cited by 22
Self-citationHost Response to Naturally Derived Biomaterials
Lopresti, S. T., & Brown, B. N. (2015) · Host Response to Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800196-7.00004-9 · Cited by 24
Self-citationSrokowski, E. M., & Woodhouse, K. A. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100691-7.00055-0 · Cited by 21
Wang, B., Mao, Y.-L., Gong, L., Xu, X., Jiang, S., Wang, Y.-B., & Li, W. (2018) · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B · doi:10.1631/jzus.b1700506 · Cited by 20
Whisker of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: Osteo-immunomodulatory behaviors
Wu, J., Feng, C., Wang, M., Wu, H., Zhu, X., Li, X., Chen, X., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-022-4591-0 · Cited by 22
Zhang, X., Wang, B., Hong, H., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Liu, C., & Chen, X. (2022) · Journal of Material Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2022.08.028 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, B. N., Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., McCabe, G. P., & Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1482-1491
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2805023
- OpenAlex
- W1999579326
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 36.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (F31EB007914)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- macrophage phenotype, macrophage polarization, tissue remodeling, extracellular matrix scaffolds, acellular scaffolds, cellular scaffolds, host tissue response, scar formation, connective tissue deposition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Nucleus, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Indoles, Macrophages, Phenotype, Transplantation, Autologous, Transplantation, Heterologous, Transplantation, Homologous, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Prosthesis Implantation, Sus scrofa, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
