The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component
Open accessAbstract
Recently, macrophages have been characterized as having an M1 or M2 phenotype based on receptor expression, cytokine and effector molecule production, and function. The effects of macrophage phenotype upon tissue remodeling following the implantation of a biomaterial are largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of a cellular component within an implanted extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold upon macrophage phenotype, and to determine the relationship between macrophage phenotype and tissue remodeling. Partial-thickness defects in the abdominal wall musculature of Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with autologous body wall tissue, acellular allogeneic rat body wall ECM, xenogeneic pig urinary bladder tissue, or acellular xenogeneic pig urinary bladder ECM. At 3, 7, 14, and 28 days the host tissue response was characterized using histologic, immunohistochemical, and RT-PCR methods. The acellular test articles were shown to elicit a predominantly M2 type response and resulted in constructive remodeling, while those containing a cellular component, even an autologous cellular component, elicited a predominantly M1 type response and resulted in deposition of dense connective tissue and/or scarring. We conclude that the presence of cellular material within an ECM scaffold modulates the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response following implantation, and that the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response appears to be related to tissue remodeling outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“What is more, it is widely accepted that during the degradation of implanted ECM bioscaffolds, ECM components are released into the environment and promote the transition to a remodeling phase [18,44,74,78].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mechanistically, inadequate decellularization retains high amounts of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) or endotoxin, and excessive crosslinking biases macrophages toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes that drive fibrosis and poor remodeling [73,74].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Immunohistochemical and gene expression analysis using CCR7 and iNOS for M1 and CD163 and Arg for M2 macrophages revealed that cellular scaffolds had a majority of M1 phenotype and provided a dense, poorly organized collagenous FBC, while decellularized scaffolds favored the M2 phenotype, and displayed both neomatrix formation and early angiogenesis.”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [180]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Here we find that MΦ activation depends on biomaterial architecture in addition to previously implicated biomaterial chemistry and bioactivity (34–36).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Recognition of the predominant MΦ phenotypic profile can provide a tool by which a tissue regenerative outcome can be predicted and possibly promoted [4].”
From Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Brown et al. [83], who demonstrated that the presence of even an autologous cellular component attracted M1 cells, which was not observed in cell free constructs.”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“Briefly, scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) have been shown to promote a switch from a predominantly M1 cell population immediately following implantation to a population enriched in M2 cells by 7–14 days post implantation [154–156].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“This constructive remodeling response has been directly linked to the ability of the material to modulate macrophage phenotype [154–157].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“Previous in vivo studies demonstrated concurrent expression of M1 and M2 markers (37), and enhanced expression of M2 markers has been associated with improved outcomes for implanted biologic scaffolds (34).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodAnalyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method
Schmittgen, T. D., & Livak, K. J. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.73 · Cited by 26,190 · cited 1×
“Relative expression of the M1 and M2 genes was calculated using the 2 ðDCt Þ method [23,24].”
MethodThe chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534 · cited 3×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundMANTOVANI, A., SOZZANI, S., LOCATI, M., ALLAVENA, P., & SICA, A. (2002) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02302-5 · Cited by 5,528
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
BackgroundMutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287 · cited 2×
“Polarized macrophages are referred to as either M1 or M2 cells, mimicking the Th1/Th2 nomenclature [9].”
BackgroundDecellularization of tissues and organs
Gilbert, T. W., Sellaro, T. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 · Cited by 2,222 · cited 2×
“The decellularization methods used to process ECM scaffolds may alter these molecules such that they can no longer negatively influence the host response or there may be a threshold amount required to alter the host response to an ECM scaffold [25].”
MethodSelf-citationMartinez, F. O., Gordon, S., Locati, M., & Mantovani, A. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303 · Cited by 2,125 · cited 1×
“Multiple studies have shown that CCR7 is highly expressed on M1 polarized cells and that CD163 is highly indicative of M2 type antiinflammatory polarization [14,35,36].”
BackgroundThe many faces of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M. (2003) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0602325 · Cited by 1,902 · cited 1×
“M2 activated macrophages express IL-12, IL-23, and IL-10high; have high levels of scavenger, mannose, and galactose receptors; produce arginase in the place of arginine, subsequently producing ornithine and polyamines; are involved in polarized Th2 reactions; and possess the ability to facilitate tissue repair and reg…”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes
Crapo, P. M., Gilbert, T. W., & Badylak, S. F. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057 · Cited by 3,591
Self-citationBiomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering
O'Brien, F. J. (2011) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70058-x · Cited by 3,437
Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions
Oryan, A., Alidadi, S., Moshiri, A., & Maffulli, N. (2014) · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · doi:10.1186/1749-799x-9-18 · Cited by 1,294
“in terms of acceptance or rejection [30,31].”
BackgroundInfluentialBrown, B. N., Ratner, B. D., Goodman, S. B., Amar, S., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.034 · Cited by 926
Self-citationThe role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds
Spiller, K. L., Anfang, R. R., Spiller, K. J., Ng, J., Nakazawa, K. R., Daulton, J. W., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.012 · Cited by 948
Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration
Gaharwar, A. K., Singh, I., & Khademhosseini, A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-0209-x · Cited by 892
Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine
Hussey, G. S., Dziki, J. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0023-x · Cited by 844
Self-citationBiomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles
Sridharan, R., Cameron, A. R., Kelly, D. J., Kearney, C. J., & O’Brien, F. J. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.019 · Cited by 826
Brown, B. N., Londono, R., Tottey, S., Zhang, L., Kukla, K. A., Wolf, M. T., Daly, K. A., Reing, J. E., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.031 · Cited by 745
Self-citationRegulation of Muscle Growth and Regeneration by the Immune System
Tidball, J. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.150 · Cited by 740
Macrophage Phenotype as a Determinant of Biologic Scaffold Remodeling
Badylak, S. F., Valentin, J. E., Ravindra, A. K., McCabe, G. P., & Stewart-Akers, A. M. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0264 · Cited by 729
Self-citationRational Design of Immunomodulatory Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing
Kharaziha, M., Baidya, A., & Annabi, N. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202100176 · Cited by 735
Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response?
Mariani, E., Lisignoli, G., Borzì, R. M., & Pulsatelli, L. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20030636 · Cited by 706
Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering
Madden, L. R., Mortisen, D. J., Sussman, E. M., Dupras, S. K., Fugate, J. A., Cuy, J. L., Hauch, K. D., Laflamme, M. A., Murry, C. E., & Ratner, B. D. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1006442107 · Cited by 662
“Previous in vivo studies demonstrated concurrent expression of M1 and M2 markers (37), and enhanced expression of M2 markers has been associated with improvedoutcomes for implantedbiologic scaffolds (34).”
BackgroundMethods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance
Keane, T. J., Swinehart, I. T., & Badylak, S. F. (2015) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.03.005 · Cited by 670
Self-citationConsequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response
Keane, T. J., Londono, R., Turner, N. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054 · Cited by 613
Self-citationAtala, A., Kasper, F. K., & Mikos, A. G. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004890 · Cited by 559
Extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for functional tissue reconstruction
Brown, B. N., & Badylak, S. F. (2013) · Translational research · doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2013.11.003 · Cited by 532
Self-citationReing, J. E., Brown, B. N., Daly, K. A., Freund, J. M., Gilbert, T. W., Hsiong, S. X., Huber, A., Kullas, K. E., Tottey, S., Wolf, M. T., et al. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.083 · Cited by 475
Self-citationGarg, K., Pullen, N. A., Oskeritzian, C. A., Ryan, J. J., & Bowlin, G. L. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.065 · Cited by 457
“The phenotypic profile of MΦs as M1 or M2 following exposure to the biomaterial can dictate remodeling and angiogenesis [3, 4].”
Seif-Naraghi, S. B., Singelyn, J. M., Salvatore, M. A., Osborn, K. G., Wang, J. J., Sampat, U., Kwan, O. L., Strachan, G. M., Wong, J. M., Schup-Magoffin, P. J., et al. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005503 · Cited by 453
Fast-degrading elastomer enables rapid remodeling of a cell-free synthetic graft into a neoartery
Wu, W. T., Allen, R., & Wang, Y. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2821 · Cited by 432
Sussman, E. M., Halpin, M. C., Muster, J., Moon, R. T., & Ratner, B. D. (2014) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-013-0933-0 · Cited by 416
Physical and mechanical regulation of macrophage phenotype and function
McWhorter, F. Y., Davis, C. T., & Liu, W. F. (2015) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1796-8 · Cited by 437
“Macrophage phenotype polarization during FBR is critical as M2 phenotype has been shown to be indicative of constructive remodeling around implanted materials [17, 18].”
BackgroundZhu, Y., Liang, H., Liu, X., Wu, J., Cao, Y., Wong, T. M., Kwan, K. Y.-H., Cheung, K., Wu, S., & Yeung, K. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf6654 · Cited by 418
RETRACTED: Engineered whole organs and complex tissues
Badylak, S. F., Weiss, D. J., Caplan, A., & Macchiarini, P. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60073-7 · Cited by 417
Self-citationRetractedTailoring Materials for Modulation of Macrophage Fate
Li, J., Jiang, X., Li, H., Gelinsky, M., & Gu, Z. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202004172 · Cited by 406
Matrix-bound nanovesicles within ECM bioscaffolds
Huleihel, L., Hussey, G. S., Naranjo, J. D., Zhang, L., Dziki, J. L., Turner, N. J., Stolz, D. B., & Badylak, S. F. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600502 · Cited by 387
Self-citationProgress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications
Jorfi, M., Skousen, J. L., Weder, C., & Capadona, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/011001 · Cited by 384
(2018) · PubMed Central · Cited by 365
Ornamenting 3D printed scaffolds with cell-laid extracellular matrix for bone tissue regeneration
Pati, F., Song, T.-H., Rijal, G., Jang, J., Kim, S. W., & Cho, D. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.012 · Cited by 360
Immunomodulatory Biomaterials for Tissue Repair
Whitaker, R. C., Hernaez‐Estrada, B., Hernández, R. M., Santos‐Vizcaíno, E., & Spiller, K. L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00895 · Cited by 347
Effect of modulating macrophage phenotype on peripheral nerve repair
Mokarram, N., Merchant, A., Mukhatyar, V., Patel, G., & Bellamkonda, R. V. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.050 · Cited by 334
“CD206+ and CCR7+ cells represent the population of macrophages that have pro-healing (M2a and M2c) and pro-inflammatory (M1) functions, respectively [26, 30].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChen, Z., Wu, C., Gu, W., Klein, T. J., Crawford, R., & Xiao, Y. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.014 · Cited by 327
Macrophage-based therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine
Spiller, K. L., & Koh, T. J. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.05.010 · Cited by 310
“With respect to biomaterial-mediated tissue repair, both M1- and M2-like macrophages have been separately associated with either vascular integration or fibrous encapsulation [6,7,90,111, 112].”
BackgroundBadylak, S. F. (2014) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-013-0963-7 · Cited by 307
Self-citationRegeneration of skeletal muscle
Turner, N. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2011) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-011-1185-7 · Cited by 309
“Chemically crosslinked products or poorly-decellularized tissues elicit a chronic M1 pro-inflammatory response and fibrosis (Badylak et al. 2008; Brown et al. 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMacrophage reaction against biomaterials in the mouse model–phenotypes, functions and markers
Klopfleisch, R. (2016) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.003 · Cited by 298
Collagen—emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient
Abou Neel, E. A., Bozec, L., Knowles, J. C., Syed, O., Mudera, V., Day, R., & Hyun, J. K. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.010 · Cited by 296
“organ rejection [80].”
Hydrogels derived from demineralized and decellularized bone extracellular matrix
Sawkins, M. J., Bowen, W., Dhadda, P., Markides, H., Sidney, L. E., Taylor, A. J., Rose, F. R. A. J., Badylak, S. F., Shakesheff, K. M., & White, L. J. (2013) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.029 · Cited by 282
“Recognition of the deleterious effects in vivo of residual cellular content upon constructive remodelling [13] has led to a recent definition of minimum criteria for decellularization [42].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHydrogels derived from central nervous system extracellular matrix
Medberry, C. J., Crapo, P. M., Siu, B. F., Carruthers, C. A., Wolf, M. T., Nagarkar, S. P., Agrawal, V., Jones, K. E., Kelly, J., Johnson, S. A., et al. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.062 · Cited by 278
“Although the mechanisms by which ECM scaffolds promote a constructive and functional remodeling response are only partially understood, recruitment of endogenous multipotent progenitor cells [9,10], modulation of the innate immune response [11,12], scaffold degradation with the generation of bioactive molecular cues […”
Self-citationFunctional Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: A Lesson in Complex Biology
Armiento, A. R., Hatt, L. P., Rosenberg, G. S., Thompson, K., & Stoddart, M. J. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909874 · Cited by 282
Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold
Valentin, J. E., Turner, N. J., Gilbert, T. W., & Badylak, S. F. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.039 · Cited by 272
Self-citationGoh, S.-K., Bertera, S., Olsen, P., Candiello, J., Halfter, W. M., Uechi, G. T., Balasubramani, M., Johnson, S. A., Sicari, B. M., Kollar, E. W., et al. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.066 · Cited by 272
“This requirement is crucial because residual DNA fragments in decellularized ECM have shown to lead to cytocompatibility issues in vitro and adverse immunological response upon implantation [49,60,61].”
Self-citationOsteoimmunomodulatory properties of magnesium scaffolds coated with β-tricalcium phosphate
Chen, Z., Mao, X., Tan, L., Friis, T., Wu, C., Crawford, R., & Xiao, Y. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.038 · Cited by 268
Brown, B. N., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.025 · Cited by 269
Self-citationBiologic scaffolds composed of central nervous system extracellular matrix
Crapo, P. M., Medberry, C. J., Reing, J. E., Tottey, S., van der Merwe, Y., Jones, K. E., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.044 · Cited by 263
Self-citationTissue Engineering Tools For Modulation of the Immune Response
Boehler, R. M., Graham, J. G., & Shea, L. D. (2011) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000113754 · Cited by 269
Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
Suamte, L., Tirkey, A., Barman, J., & Babu, P. J. (2022) · Smart Materials in Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.smmf.2022.100011 · Cited by 294
Biologic scaffold composed of skeletal muscle extracellular matrix
Wolf, M. T., Daly, K. A., Reing, J. E., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.055 · Cited by 259
Self-citationThe promotion of a constructive macrophage phenotype by solubilized extracellular matrix
Sicari, B. M., Dziki, J. L., Siu, B. F., Medberry, C. J., Dearth, C. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.060 · Cited by 255
Self-citationRen, Y., Fan, L., Alkildani, S., Liu, L., Emmert, S., Najman, S. J., Rimashevskiy, D. V., Schnettler, R., Jung, O., Xiong, X. B., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232314987 · Cited by 253
Macrophage polarization in response to ECM coated polypropylene mesh
Wolf, M. T., Dearth, C. L., Ranallo, C. A., LoPresti, S. T., Carey, L. E., Daly, K. A., Brown, B. N., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.115 · Cited by 236
Self-citationBiologic Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine: Mechanisms of In vivo Remodeling
Londoño, R., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-014-1103-8 · Cited by 236
Self-citationHibino, N., Yi, T., Duncan, D. R., Rathore, A., Dean, E. W., Naito, Y., Dardik, A., Kyriakides, T. R., Madri, J. A., Pober, J. S., et al. (2011) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.11-186585 · Cited by 232
“Recent studies have suggested that macrophage phenotype could be influenced by acellular and cell-containing scaffolds and plays an important role in remodeling (30, 31).”
BackgroundHachim, D., LoPresti, S. T., Yates, C. C., & Brown, B. N. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.019 · Cited by 228
Self-citationLyons, F. G., Al-Munajjed, A. A., Kieran, S. M., Toner, M. E., Murphy, C. M., Duffy, G. P., & O’Brien, F. J. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.056 · Cited by 222
Brown, B. N., Freund, J. M., Li, H., Rubin, J. P., Reing, J. E., Jeffries, E. M., Wolf, M. T., Tottey, S., Barnes, C. A., Ratner, B. D., et al. (2010) · Tissue Engineering Part C Methods · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0342 · Cited by 223
“Similarly, a recent study showed that the presence of a large amount of cellular content within an ECM scaffold led to a more inflammatory type host response after implantation and resulted in the formation of scar tissue within the site of remodeling.(44) This response is in contrast to the constructive remodeling th…”
ResultSelf-citationBadylak, S. F., Hoppo, T., Nieponice, A., Gilbert, T. W., Davison, J. M., & Jobe, B. A. (2011) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0739 · Cited by 222
“However, studies of ECM scaffold remodeling in preclinical animal models of body wall replacement show that a robust mononuclear cell infiltrate occurs in the 4–28 day postsurgical period and that these cells represent a predominantly M2 macrophage phenotype.(38,41) The M2 phenotype is associated with a constructive t…”
Self-citationThe effect of detergents on the basement membrane complex of a biologic scaffold material
Faulk, D. M., Carruthers, C. A., Warner, H. J., Kramer, C. R., Reing, J. E., Zhang, L., D’Amore, A., & Badylak, S. F. (2013) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.006 · Cited by 227
Self-citationHong, Y., Huber, A., Takanari, K., Amoroso, N. J., Hashizume, R., Badylak, S. F., & Wagner, W. R. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.025 · Cited by 221
Self-citationScaffold devices for rotator cuff repair
Ricchetti, E. T., Aurora, A., Iannotti, J. P., & Derwin, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.003 · Cited by 213
Revision joint replacement, wear particles, and macrophage polarization
Rao, A. J., Gibon, E., Ma, T., Yao, Z., Smith, R. L., & Goodman, S. B. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.042 · Cited by 209
Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds in tissue remodeling and morphogenesis
Swinehart, I. T., & Badylak, S. F. (2015) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.24379 · Cited by 213
“Tissue remodeling following implantation of these materials is associated with a robust macrophage response beginning as early as 2 days postimplantation and continuing for several months, depending on the material and clinical application (Brown et al., 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationConducting Polymers, Hydrogels and Their Composites: Preparation, Properties and Bioapplications
Tomczykowa, M., & Plonska-Brzezinska, M. E. (2019) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym11020350 · Cited by 212
Syed, O., Walters, N. J., Day, R. M., Kim, H.-W., & Knowles, J. C. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.024 · Cited by 205
Extracellular matrix scaffold devices for rotator cuff repair
Derwin, K. A., Badylak, S. F., Steinmann, S. P., & Iannotti, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.020 · Cited by 205
Self-citationEuropium-doped mesoporous silica nanosphere as an immune-modulating osteogenesis/angiogenesis agent
Shi, M., Xia, L., Chen, Z., Lv, F., Zhu, H., Wei, F., Han, S., Chang, J., Xiao, Y., & Wu, C. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.027 · Cited by 204
“It is well accepted that mac rophages have two phenotypes M1 and M2 [41], M1 is known to secrete pro-inflammatory cytok ines that can induce osteoclastogenesis and lead to bone resorption.”
Fishman, J. M., Lowdell, M. W., Urbani, L., Ansari, T., Burns, A. J., Turmaine, M., North, J., Sibbons, P., Seifalian, A. M., Wood, K. J., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1213228110 · Cited by 199
Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior
Cramer, M. C., & Badylak, S. F. (2020) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02408-9 · Cited by 196
Self-citationMacrophages Are Key Regulators of Stem Cells during Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Diseases
Dort, J., Fabre, P., Molina, T., & Dumont, N. A. (2019) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2019/4761427 · Cited by 211
“Acellular biological scaffolds were shown to elicit an anti-inflammatory macrophage response resulting in constructive remodelling, while scaffolds containing cellular components were associated with a proinflammatory macrophage response resulting in fibrosis and failed regeneration [191].”
BackgroundDziki, J. L., Wang, D. S., Pineda, C., Sicari, B. M., Rausch, T., & Badylak, S. F. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35894 · Cited by 201
Self-citationCurrent Methods for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Repair and Regeneration
Liu, J., Saul, D., Böker, K. O., Ernst, J., Lehmann, W., & Schilling, A. F. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/1984879 · Cited by 199
“Muscle fiber regeneration is performed by cells and consequently cell-based strategies for regeneration have been pursued [83, 85].”
BackgroundExtracellular Matrix‐Based Strategies for Immunomodulatory Biomaterials Engineering
Rowley, A. T., Nagalla, R. R., Wang, S., & Liu, W. F. (2019) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201801578 · Cited by 193
Strain-dependent modulation of macrophage polarization within scaffolds
Ballotta, V., Driessen-Mol, A., Bouten, C. V. C., & Baaijens, F. P. T. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.002 · Cited by 182
“At later stages, a predominance of M2 phenotype was shown to promote resolution of the inflammation and to result in successful remodelling of the construct [9].”
BackgroundMacrophage and dendritic cell phenotypic diversity in the context of biomaterials
Kou, P. M., & Babensee, J. E. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32971 · Cited by 190
Plants and plant-based polymers as scaffolds for tissue engineering
Iravani, S., & Varma, R. S. (2019) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9gc02391g · Cited by 190
Rethinking Regenerative Medicine: A Macrophage-Centered Approach
Brown, B. N., Sicari, B. M., & Badylak, S. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00510 · Cited by 196
“Multiple studies have shown that ECM based scaffold materials which are properly prepared facilitate a transition from an M1 to an M2 phenotype around 7–14 days post-implantation (3, 92, 93).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTurner, N. J., Yates, A. J., Weber, D. J., Qureshi, I. R., Stolz, D. B., Gilbert, T. W., & Badylak, S. F. (2010) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0169 · Cited by 191
“33 In addition, the use of noncrosslinked scaffolds has been shown to modify the inflammatory response, promoting an M2, or tissue remodeling response, over the proinflammatory M1 response 34,35 a factor that has been shown to be essential for effective muscle regeneration.”
Self-citationSurface characterization of extracellular matrix scaffolds
Brown, B. N., Barnes, C. A., Kasick, R. T., Michel, R., Gilbert, T. W., Beer–Stolz, D., Castner, D. G., Ratner, B. D., & Badylak, S. F. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.061 · Cited by 180
Self-citationA Murine Model of Volumetric Muscle Loss and a Regenerative Medicine Approach for Tissue Replacement
Sicari, B. M., Agrawal, V., Siu, B. F., Medberry, C. J., Dearth, C. L., Turner, N. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0475 · Cited by 182
“20 45 Previous studies have shown that cells that accumulate at a site of ECM implantation include macrophages, 19,46 multipotential stem/progenitor cells, 47,48 endothelial cells, 49,50 nerves, 25 and muscle cells.”
Self-citationThe host response to naturally-derived extracellular matrix biomaterials
Morris, A. H., Stamer, D. K., & Kyriakides, T. R. (2017) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.01.002 · Cited by 180
Macrophage phenotype in response to ECM bioscaffolds
Huleihel, L., Dziki, J. L., Bartolacci, J. G., Rausch, T., Scarritt, M. E., Cramer, M. C., Vorobyov, T., LoPresti, S. T., Swineheart, I. T., White, L. J., et al. (2017) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.04.004 · Cited by 169
“This pro-healing response has been attributed, in large part, to the effect of ECM on macrophage phenotype [8].”
Self-citationInjectable Acellular Hydrogels for Cardiac Repair
Tous, E., Purcell, B. P., Ifkovits, J. L., & Burdick, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s12265-011-9291-1 · Cited by 164
Vascular tissue engineering: from in vitro to in situ
Li, S., Sengupta, D., & Chien, S. (2013) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1246 · Cited by 173
Epimorphic regeneration approach to tissue replacement in adult mammals
Agrawal, V., Johnson, S. A., Reing, J. E., Zhang, L., Tottey, S., Wang, G., Hirschi, K. K., Braunhut, S. J., Gudas, L. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905851106 · Cited by 162
Self-citationHe, M., & Callanan, A. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0340 · Cited by 160
Koobatian, M. T., Row, S., Smith, R. J., Koenigsknecht, C., Andreadis, S. T., & Swartz, D. D. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.020 · Cited by 158
Zhang, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., HUANG, X.-H., Yang, L., Xu, J. J., Yang, W., Fan, X.-J., Du, B., et al. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.029 · Cited by 157
Vasconcelos, D. P., Costa, M. M., Amaral, I. F., Barbosa, M. A., Águas, A. P., & Barbosa, J. N. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.035 · Cited by 153
Expanded 3D Nanofiber Scaffolds: Cell Penetration, Neovascularization, and Host Response
Jiang, J., Li, Z., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Carlson, M. A., Teusink, M. J., MacEwan, M. R., Gu, L., & Xie, J. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201600808 · Cited by 151
Massensini, A. R., Ghuman, H., Saldin, L. T., Medberry, C. J., Keane, T. J., Nicholls, F. J., Velankar, S., Badylak, S. F., & Modo, M. (2015) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.040 · Cited by 152
Self-citationMacrophage polarization following chitosan implantation
Vasconcelos, D. P., Fonseca, A. C., Costa, M. M., Amaral, I. F., Barbosa, M. A., Águas, A. P., & Barbosa, J. N. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.012 · Cited by 161
Kheir, E., Stapleton, T. W., Shaw, D., Jin, Z. M., Fisher, J., & Ingham, E. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.33171 · Cited by 150
Li, X., Zhang, C., Haggerty, A. E., Yan, J., Lan, M. J., Seu, M. Y., Yang, M., Marlow, M. M., Maldonado, I. C., Cho, B., et al. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119978 · Cited by 149
“We found that our composite had a similar fibrillary microarchitecture as native spinal cord ECM and resulted in 85% of the injury occupied by cells and structures.”
BackgroundInfluentialAurora, A., Roe, J. L., Corona, B. T., & Walters, J. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.040 · Cited by 150
“Furthermore, the lack of tissue deposition (fibrotic or otherwise) observed in the current study are in contrast to current and previous studies investigating a variety of xenogeneic ECM scaffolds in abdominal wall [29,30,35] or TA muscle VML defects [6].”
ResultInjectable anti-inflammatory hyaluronic acid hydrogel for osteoarthritic cartilage repair
Jin, Y., Koh, R. H., Kim, S., Kim, K. M., Park, G. K., & Hwang, N. S.-Y. (2020) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.111096 · Cited by 146
Decellularized extracellular matrix mediates tissue construction and regeneration
Liu, C., Pei, M., Li, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Frontiers of Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11684-021-0900-3 · Cited by 151
Gentile, P., Scioli, M. G., Bielli, A., Orlandi, A., & Cervelli, V. (2016) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.2498 · Cited by 144
Immunomodulatory activity of andrographolide on macrophage activation and specific antibody response
Wang, W., Wang, J., Dong, S.-F., Liu, C., Italiani, P., Sun, S.-H., Xu, J., Boraschi, D., Ma, S., & Qu, D. (2010) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/aps.2009.205 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, B. N., Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., McCabe, G. P., & Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1482-1491
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2805023
- OpenAlex
- W1999579326
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 36.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (F31EB007914)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- macrophage phenotype, macrophage polarization, tissue remodeling, extracellular matrix scaffolds, acellular scaffolds, cellular scaffolds, host tissue response, scar formation, connective tissue deposition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Nucleus, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Indoles, Macrophages, Phenotype, Transplantation, Autologous, Transplantation, Heterologous, Transplantation, Homologous, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Prosthesis Implantation, Sus scrofa, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
