Cited by 144Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

A Genome-wide Association Study of Autism Using the Simons Simplex Collection: Does Reducing Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Autism Increase Genetic Homogeneity?

Open access
Chaste, Pauline, Klei, Lambertus, Sanders, Stephan J., Hus, Vanessa, Murtha, Michael T., Lowe, Jennifer K., Willsey, A. Jeremy, Moreno-De-Luca, Daniel +16 more·2015·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Phenotypic heterogeneity in autism has long been conjectured to be a major hindrance to the discovery of genetic risk factors, leading to numerous attempts to stratify children based on phenotype to increase power of discovery studies. This approach, however, is based on the hypothesis that phenotypic heterogeneity closely maps to genetic variation, which has not been tested. Our study examines the impact of subphenotyping of a well-characterized autism spectrum disorder (ASD) sample on genetic homogeneity and the ability to discover common genetic variants conferring liability to ASD.Methods Genome-wide genotypic data of 2576 families from the Simons Simplex Collection were analyzed in the overall sample and phenotypic subgroups defined on the basis of diagnosis, IQ, and symptom profiles. We conducted a family-based association study, as well as estimating heritability and evaluating allele scores for each phenotypic subgroup.Results Association analyses revealed no genome-wide significant association signal. Subphenotyping did not increase power substantially. Moreover, allele scores built from the most associated single nucleotide polymorphisms, based on the odds ratio in the full sample, predicted case status in subsets of the sample equally well and heritability estimates were very similar for all subgroups.Conclusions In genome-wide association analysis of the Simons Simplex Collection sample, reducing phenotypic heterogeneity had at most a modest impact on genetic homogeneity. Our results are based on a relatively small sample, one with greater homogeneity than the entire population; if they apply more broadly, they imply that analysis of subphenotypes is not a productive path forward for discovering genetic risk variants in ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.017

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [39]Health-ABC http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgibin/study.cgi?studyid=phs000169.v1.p1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaste, P., Klei, L., Sanders, S. J., Hus, V., Murtha, M. T., Lowe, J. K., Willsey, A. J., Moreno-De-Luca, D., Yu, T. W., Fombonne, E., Geschwind, D., Grice, D. E., Ledbetter, D. H., Mane, S. M., Martin, D. M., Morrow, E. M., Walsh, C. A., Sutcliffe, J. S., Lese Martin, C., Beaudet, A. L., Lord, C., State, M. W., Cook, E. H., & Devlin, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Chaste, Pauline
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
77
Issue
9
Pages
775-784
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987925623
Cited by
144
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18
FWCI
11.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HD065272, R01MH089390, R37 MH057881)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R25MH071584-07, T32 MH19961-14)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, phenotypic heterogeneity, subphenotyping, genetic homogeneity, genetic risk variants, Simons Simplex Collection, family-based association study, heritability, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review