Cited by 568Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Standardizing ADOS Domain Scores: Separating Severity of Social Affect and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors

Open access
Hus, Vanessa, Gotham, Katherine, Lord, Catherine·2014·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Standardized Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) scores provide a measure of autism severity that is less influenced by child characteristics than raw totals (Gotham et al. in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(5), 693-705 2009). However, these scores combine symptoms from the Social Affect (SA) and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors (RRB) domains. Separate calibrations of each domain would provide a clearer picture of ASD dimensions. The current study separately calibrated raw totals from the ADOS SA and RRB domains. Standardized domain scores were less influenced by child characteristics than raw domain totals, thereby increasing their utility as indicators of Social-Communication and Repetitive Behavior severity. Calibrated domain scores should facilitate efforts to examine trajectories of ASD symptoms and links between neurobiological and behavioral dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1719-1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lord C Rutter M DiLavore PC Risi S Gotham K Bishop S Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule 2012 Western Psychological Services Torrance 2nd Edition (ADOS-2)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hus, V., Gotham, K., & Lord, C.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2012-11-11
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
2400-2412
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2051230880
Cited by
568
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks (AS7032, AS2482)
  • National Institutes of Health (5rc1mh089721-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (RC1 MH-089721, T32MH018921, K01MH103500, R01MH081873)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, autism severity, social affect, restricted and repetitive behaviors, Z-score, score calibration
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Calibration, Child, Humans, Male, Reference Standards, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior Disorders, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review