Cited by 141Electrochemical sensors and biosensorsAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

A long-term flexible minimally-invasive implantable glucose biosensor based on an epoxy-enhanced polyurethane membrane

Yu, Bazhang, Long, Nathan, Moussy, Yvonne, Moussy, Francis·2006·Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Abstract

This paper describes the preparation method as well as the in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel flexible glucose biosensor designed for long-term subcutaneous implantation. An epoxy-enhanced polyurethane membrane, which includes ca. 30-40% epoxy resin adhesive and 50-70% polyurethane, has been developed and used for the first time as the outer protective membrane of the sensor. This new membrane was developed to increase the in vivo durability and lifetime of implantable biosensors. This epoxy-polyurethane membrane was shown to be porous and is of excellent durability. A sensor with such a membrane shows excellent long-term stability and can last for 4-8 months in solutions at room temperature. To verify the in vivo performance of the sensor, nine sensors were implanted in three rats and tested regularly. Eight sensors kept functioning well in the rats for 10-56 days. The ninth sensor was damaged during implantation. All original sensitivity data as well as four response curves obtained at days 7, 17, 52 and 56, respectively are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bios.2005.11.002

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one of nine sensors functioned for 56 days, and seven of nine lost functionality within 17 days or less.

    “However, only one of the nine sensors functioned this long. Indeed, seven of the nine sensors lost functionality in 17 d or less.141”
  • Epoxy-polyurethane membranes allowed fabrication of functional glucose sensors in rats for up to 56 days with good sensitivity.

    “The authors reported that this membrane allowed for the fabrication of functional glucose sensors in rats for up to 56 days with good sensitivity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, B., Long, N., Moussy, Y., & Moussy, F.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Moussy, Francis
Venue
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
2275-2282
ISSN
0956-5663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081012836
Cited by
141
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biosensors and Bioelectronics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
flexible biosensors, subcutaneous implantation, long-term sensor stability, porous membranes, sensor sensitivity, rat implantation
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Glucose, Cattle, Elasticity, Enzymes, Immobilized, Epoxy Compounds, Equipment Design, Glucose Oxidase, Membranes, Artificial, Polyurethanes, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Biosensing Techniques, Equipment Failure Analysis, Prostheses and Implants, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review