Cited by 152Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsTactile and Sensory InteractionsFree Will and Agency

The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb

Haans, Antal, IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A., de Kort, Yvonne A.W.·2008·Body Image

Abstract

In the rubber-hand illusion (RHI), people attribute an artificial object to their own body. In the present study, we investigate the extent to which RHI is affected by visual discrepancies between the artificial object and a human hand. We tested Armel and Ramachandran's (2003) hypothesis that people will experience a stronger RHI when the artificial object is a skin-like textured sheet instead of a tabletop. We did not find support for their hypothesis, but the strength of the RHI diminished when the texture of a hand-shaped object did not resemble the human skin (manipulated by putting a white glove over the cosmetic prosthesis). We provide an alternative explanation for this finding, based on a skill-based sensorimotor account of perceived body ownership. Such an explanation supports Armel and Ramachandran's more general claim that discrepancies in the nature of expected and felt touch diminish the RHI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.04.003

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RHI is not induced (or is much weaker) when visuo-tactile stimulation is applied to a non-corporeal object or when the rubber hand is placed in a position that is anatomically incompatible with the subject's posture.

    “However, this does not normally occur, since the RHI is not induced (or it is much weaker) when visuo-tactile stimulation is applied to a non-corporeal object (Armel & Ramachandran, 2003;Haans, Ijsselsteijn, & de Kort, 2008;Tsakiris, Carpenter, James, & Fotopoulou, 2010;Tsakiris & Haggard, 2005) or when the rubber hand is placed in a position that is anatomically incompatible with the subject's”

    From Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness (2013) · cites this paper as Haans et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haans, A., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & de Kort, Y. A. W.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Haans, Antal
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
389-394
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131979409
Cited by
152
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
rubber hand illusion, body ownership, sense of ownership, skin texture, hand shape, touch
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Artificial Limbs, Awareness, Body Image, Female, Hand, Humans, Male, Optical Illusions, Orientation, Perceptual Distortion, Proprioception, Skin, Touch, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review