Cited by 123Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsMultisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory Interactions

Beyond the colour of my skin: how skin colour affects the sense of body-ownership

Open access
Farmer, Harry, Tajadura-Jiménez, Ana, Tsakiris, Manos·2012·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Multisensory stimulation has been shown to alter the sense of body-ownership. Given that perceived similarity between one's own body and those of others is crucial for social cognition, we investigated whether multisensory stimulation can lead participants to experience ownership over a hand of different skin colour. Results from two studies using introspective, behavioural and physiological methods show that, following synchronous visuotactile (VT) stimulation, participants can experience body-ownership over hands that seem to belong to a different racial group. Interestingly, a baseline measure of implicit racial bias did not predict whether participants would experience the RHI, but the overall strength of experienced body-ownership seemed to predict the participants' post-illusion implicit racial bias with those who experienced a stronger RHI showing a lower bias. These findings suggest that multisensory experiences can override strict ingroup/outgroup distinctions based on skin colour and point to a key role for sensory processing in social cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2012.04.011

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the different body depicted an outgroup person, acquired ownership did not depend on pre-existing levels of implicit outgroup bias; participants experienced ownership over another's body regardless of their levels of negative implicit attitudes towards the other's social group.

    “Furthermore, in the case where the different body depicted an outgroup person, the acquired ownership did not depend on pre-existing levels of implicit outgroup bias; participants experienced ownership over another's body regardless of their levels of negative implicit attitudes towards the other's social group [13].”
  • In the rubber hand illusion, if the object placed in front of the participant is non-corporeal, is a rubber hand of a different skin tone, or is placed in a spatially incongruent location, the sense of ownership over the object is modulated or not present at all.

    “In the rubber hand illusion, if the object placed in front of the participant is non-corporeal (Tsakiris et al., 2010a), is a rubber hand of a different skin tone (Farmer et al., 2012) or is placed in a spatially incongruent location (Bekrater-Bodmann et al., 2012; Cadieux et al., 2011; Costantini and Haggard, 2007; Folegatti et al., 2012; Hohwy and Paton, 2010; Holle et al., 2011; Makin et al., 2”

    From The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Farmer et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dimberg U Facial electromyography and emotional reactions Psychophysiology 1990 27 481 494 2274612

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farmer, H., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., & Tsakiris, M.
Affiliations
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Farmer, Harry
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
1242-1256
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002546451
Cited by
123
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
body ownership, skin colour, multisensory integration, rubber hand illusion, implicit racial bias, social cognition, multisensory perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Illusions, Judgment, Male, Ownership, Prejudice, Proprioception, Self Concept, Skin Pigmentation, Visual Perception, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review