Cited by 122Regulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and BehaviorsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Effect of menstrual cycle phase on corticolimbic brain activation by visual food cues

Frank, Tamar C., Kim, Ginah L., Krzemien, Alicja, Van Vugt, Dean A.·2010·Brain Research

Abstract

Food intake is decreased during the late follicular phase and increased in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. While a changing ovarian steroid milieu is believed to be responsible for this behavior, the specific mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Brain activity in response to visual food stimuli was compared during the estrogen dominant peri-ovulatory phase and the progesterone dominant luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Twelve women underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during the peri-ovulatory and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in a counterbalanced fashion. Whole brain T2* images were collected while subjects viewed pictures of high calorie (HC) foods, low calorie (LC) foods, and control (C) pictures presented in a block design. Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in the late follicular phase and luteal phase was determined for the contrasts HC-C, LC-C, HC-LC, and LC-HC. Both HC and LC stimuli activated numerous corticolimbic brain regions in the follicular phase, whereas only HC stimuli were effective in the luteal phase. Activation of the nucleus accumbens (NAc), amygdala, and hippocampus in response to the HC-C contrast and the hippocampus in response to the LC-C contrast was significantly increased in the late follicular phase compared to the luteal phase. Activation of the orbitofrontal cortex and mid cingulum in response to the HC-LC contrast was greater during the luteal phase. These results demonstrate for the first time that brain responses to visual food cues are influenced by menstrual cycle phase. We postulate that ovarian steroid modulation of the corticolimbic brain contributes to changes in ingestive behavior during the menstrual cycle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.071

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, T. C., Kim, G. L., Krzemien, A., & Van Vugt, D. A.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
1363
Pages
81-92
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081552422
Cited by
122
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Physicians Services Incorporated
  • Botterell Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
menstrual cycle, luteal phase, follicular phase, visual food cues, corticolimbic system, nucleus accumbens, amygdala, hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, midcingulate cortex, ovarian steroids, estrogen, progesterone, dietary intake, high-calorie foods, low-calorie foods, ingestive behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Eating, Female, Follicular Phase, Food, Food Preferences, Gyrus Cinguli, Hippocampus, Humans, Limbic System, Luteal Phase, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Menstrual Cycle, Neural Pathways, Nucleus Accumbens, Photic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review