Cited by 13Neural dynamics and brain functionStress Responses and CortisolNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Modulation of Attention and Stress with Arousal: The Mental and Physical Effects of Riding a Motorcycle

Open access
Vaughn, Don A., Maggiora, Michael B., Vaughn, Kathryn J., Maggiora, Christina J., Tavakoli, Amir-Vala, Liang, William, Zava, David, Cohen, Mark S. +1 more·2021·Brain Research

Abstract

Existing theories suggest that moderate arousal improves selective attention, as would be expected in the context of competitive sports or sensation-seeking activities. Here we investigated how riding a motorcycle, an attention-demanding physical activity, affects sensory processing. To do so, we implemented the passive auditory oddball paradigm and measured the EEG response of participants as they rode a motorcycle, drove a car, and sat at rest. Specifically, we measured the N1 and mismatch negativity to auditory tones, as well as alpha power during periods of no tones. We investigated whether riding and driving modulated non-CNS metrics including heart rate and concentrations of the hormones epinephrine, cortisol, DHEA-S, and testosterone. While participants were riding, we found a decrease in N1 amplitude, increase in mismatch negativity, and decrease in relative alpha power, together suggesting enhancement of sensory processing and visual attention. Riding increased epinephrine levels, increased heart rate, and decreased the ratio of cortisol to DHEA-S. Together, these results suggest that riding increases focus, heightens the brain's passive monitoring of changes in the sensory environment, and alters HPA axis response. More generally, our findings suggest that selective attention and sensory monitoring seem to be separable neural processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147203

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughn, D. A., Maggiora, M. B., Vaughn, K. J., Maggiora, C. J., Tavakoli, A.-V., Liang, W., Zava, D., Cohen, M. S., & Lenartowicz, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • ZRT Laboratory (US)
  • California NanoSystems Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Vaughn, Don A.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
1752
Pages
147203
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124113339
Cited by
13
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Harley-Davidson Motor Company
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
motorcycle riding, selective attention, arousal, stress, auditory oddball paradigm, mismatch negativity, N1 component, alpha power, sensory processing, heart rate, epinephrine, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, testosterone, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, driving, visual attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motorcycles, Psychomotor Performance, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review