Cited by 92Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsMind wandering and attention

Capturing worry in daily life: Are trait questionnaires sufficient?

Verkuil, Bart, Brosschot, Jos F., Thayer, Julian F.·2007·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Worry is crucial in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders and has been associated with several other adverse health outcomes. Yet, little is known about the frequency and perseveration of worry in daily life, and its predictability by widely used trait questionnaires. In this study 432 students completed the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), the Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait version (STAI-T) and kept a log of worry frequency and duration during six consecutive days and nights. The results showed that worry is a very common phenomenon that is predicted by the two trait worry questionnaires, independent of trait anxiety. The often clinically utilized PSWQ predicted worry duration better than the WDQ, and exclusively predicted night-time worry and several other indices of perseverative and potentially pathogenic worry. Although this study provides some support for the predictive validity of the PSWQ and the WDQ, these questionnaires did not account for the larger part of variance in daily worry. Future studies of worry and its associated perseverative processes should consider using momentary assessments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.004

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Penn State Worry Questionnaire cannot satisfactorily distinguish clinical from everyday worries.

    “zwischen klinischen und alltäglichen Sorgen vermag das Verfahren nicht befriedigend zu trennen [Ruscio et al., 2001;Verkuil et al., 2007].”

    From Wann sind Sorgen pathologisch? (2009) · cites this paper as Verkuil et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verkuil, B., Brosschot, J. F., & Thayer, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Verkuil, Bart
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
1835-1844
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000628628
Cited by
92
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
worry, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, trait anxiety, anxiety disorders, momentary assessment
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review