Cited by 185Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The effects of cognitive-behavior therapy for depression on repetitive negative thinking: A meta-analysis

Open access
Spinhoven, Philip, Klein, Nicola, Kennis, Mitzy, Cramer, Angélique O.J., Siegle, Greg, Cuijpers, Pim, Ormel, Johan, Hollon, Steve D. +1 more·2018·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

It is not clear if treatments for depression targeting repetitive negative thinking (RNT: rumination, worry and content-independent perseverative thinking) have a specific effect on RNT resulting in better outcomes than treatments that do not specifically target rumination. We conducted a systematic search of PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library for randomized trials in adolescents, adults and older adults comparing CBT treatments for (previous) depression with control groups or with other treatments and reporting outcomes on RNT. Inclusion criteria were met by 36 studies with a total of 3307 participants. At post-test we found a medium-sized effect of any treatment compared to control groups on RNT (g = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.37-0.59). Rumination-focused CBT: g = 0.76, <0.01; Cognitive Control Training: g = 0.62, p < .01; CBT: g = 0.57, p < .01; Concreteness training: g = 0.53, p < .05; and Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy: g = 0.42, p < .05 had medium sized and significantly larger effect sizes than other types of treatment (i.e., anti-depressant medication, light therapy, engagement counseling, life review, expressive writing, yoga) (g = 0.14) compared to control groups. Effects on RNT at post-test were strongly associated with the effects on depression severity and this association was only significant in RNT-focused CBT. Our results suggest that in particular RNT-focused CBT may have a more pronounced effect on RNT than other types of interventions. Further mediation and mechanistic studies to test the predictive value of reductions in RNT following RNT-focused CBT for subsequent depression outcomes are called for.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2018.04.002

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spinhoven et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis of 36 studies investigating the effects of various forms of CBT on repetitive negative thinking compared with control groups and other treatments.

    “Similar to the review by Cristea et al. (2015), Spinhoven et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis of 36 studies that investigated the effects of various forms of CBT on repetitive negative thinking (i.e., rumination) compared with control groups and other treatments.”

    From The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Spinhoven et al. 2018

  • Spinhoven et al. found a medium-size effect of any treatment compared with control, but significantly larger effect sizes for CBT treatments such as rumination-focused CBT and original CBT compared with antidepressant medication and counseling.

    “They found a medium-size effect of any treatment compared with the control group, but they also found significantly larger effect sizes for CBT treatments such as rumination-focused CBT and original CBT compared with treatments such as antidepressant medication and counseling.”

    From The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Spinhoven et al. 2018

  • Spinhoven et al. concluded that CBT and, in particular, rumination-focused CBT might have specific and pronounced effects on repetitive thinking, establishing a link between a therapeutic procedure and a therapeutic process.

    “The authors concluded that CBT and, in particular, rumination-focused CBT might have specific and pronounced effects on repetitive thinking, which might be interpreted as establishing a link between a therapeutic procedure (i.e., specific CBT interventions) and a therapeutic process (i.e., rumination).”

    From The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Spinhoven et al. 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spinhoven, P., Klein, N., Kennis, M., Cramer, A. O. J., Siegle, G., Cuijpers, P., Ormel, J., Hollon, S. D., & Bockting, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Spinhoven, Philip
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
106
Pages
71-85
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802393978
Cited by
185
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, repetitive negative thinking, rumination, worry, perseverative thinking, depression treatment, cognitive control training, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, depression severity, antidepressants, phototherapy, expressive writing
MeSH terms
Pessimism, Rumination, Cognitive, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review