Cited by 78Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Mindfulness-based yoga intervention for women with depression

Schuver, Katie J., Lewis, Beth A.·2016·Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of a 12-week mindfulness-based yoga intervention on depressive symptoms and rumination among depressed women.Design Prospective, randomized, controlled 12 week intervention pilot study. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks), and one-month follow-up.Setting Women with a history of diagnosed depression and currently depressed were randomized to a mindfulness-based yoga condition or a walking control.Interventions The mindfulness-based yoga intervention consisted of a home-based yoga asana, pranayama and meditation practice with mindfulness education sessions delivered over the telephone. The walking control condition consisted of home-based walking sessions and health education sessions delivered over the phone.Main outcome measures The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS).Results Both groups reported decreases in depressive symptoms from baseline to post-intervention, f(1,33)=34.83, p<0.001, and from baseline to one-month follow-up, f(1,33)=37.01, p<0.001. After controlling for baseline, there were no significant between group differences on depression scores at post-intervention and the one-month follow-up assessment. The mindfulness-based yoga condition reported significantly lower levels of rumination than the control condition at post-intervention, after controlling for baseline levels of rumination, f(1,31)=6.23, p<0.01.Conclusions These findings suggest that mindfulness-based yoga may provide tools to manage ruminative thoughts among women with elevated depressive symptoms. Future studies, with larger samples are needed to address the effect of yoga on depression and further explore the impact on rumination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuver, K. J., & Lewis, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Schuver, Katie J.
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
26
Pages
85-91
ISSN
0965-2299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2300278930
Cited by
77
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression, women, rumination, depressive symptoms, pranayama, meditation, home-based intervention, walking control, yoga asanas
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Yoga, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review