Cited by 141Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Tracing dynamic changes of DNA methylation at single cell resolution

Open access
Stelzer, Yonatan, Shivalila, Chikdu Shakti, Soldner, Frank, Markoulaki, Styliani, Jaenisch, Rudolf·2015·Cell

Abstract

Mammalian DNA methylation plays an essential role in development. To date, only snapshots of different mouse and human cell types have been generated, providing a static view on DNA methylation. To enable monitoring of methylation status as it changes over time, we establish a reporter of genomic methylation (RGM) that relies on a minimal imprinted gene promoter driving a fluorescent protein. We show that insertion of RGM proximal to promoter-associated CpG islands reports the gain or loss of DNA methylation. We further utilized RGM to report endogenous methylation dynamics of non-coding regulatory elements, such as the pluripotency-specific super enhancers of Sox2 and miR290. Loci-specific DNA methylation changes and their correlation with transcription were visualized during cell-state transition following differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells and during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. RGM will allow the investigation of dynamic methylation changes during development and disease at single-cell resolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.046

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RGM was used to monitor the DNA methylation status of non-coding regulatory elements during different biological processes, such as cellular reprogramming, tracking the enhancers associated with Sox2 and miR290.

    “RGM was used to monitor the DNA methylation status of non-coding regulatory elements during different biological processes, such as cellular reprogramming, tracking the enhancers associated with Sox2 and miR290.”

    From Mapping gene regulatory networks from single-cell omics data (2018) · cites this paper as [74]

  • Stelzer et al. established a reporter of genomic methylation (RGM) allowing real-time tracking of changes in DNA methylation at a specific locus, both in vitro and in vivo, with single-cell resolution.

    “Stelzer et al. [74] established a reporter of genomic methylation (RGM), allowing real-time tracking of changes in DNA methylation at a specific locus, both in vitro and in vivo, with single-cell resolution.”

    From Mapping gene regulatory networks from single-cell omics data (2018) · cites this paper as [74]

  • De-methylation of both the Sox2 and miR290 enhancers is a late event in the reprogramming process.

    “They show that de-methylation of both these enhancers is a late event in the reprogramming process.”

    From Mapping gene regulatory networks from single-cell omics data (2018) · cites this paper as [74]

  • A fluorescent in vivo reporter of genomic methylation enables microscopic examination of 5mC status at a single genomic locus with cellular resolution.

    “In addition to sequencing-based single-cell methylome strategies, a fluorescent in vivo reporter of genomic methylation (RGM) enables microscopic examination of the 5mC status at a single genomic locus with cellular resolution (53).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stelzer, Y., Shivalila, C. S., Soldner, F., Markoulaki, S., & Jaenisch, R.
Affiliations
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
Corresponding author
Jaenisch, Rudolf
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
218-229
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105893097
Cited by
141
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD045022, HD045022, R37HD045022)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
DNA methylation dynamics, fluorescent protein reporter, CpG islands, super-enhancers, SOX2, mouse embryonic stem cells, cell differentiation, somatic cell reprogramming, pluripotency, non-coding regulatory elements, transcription
MeSH terms
Animals, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, DNA Modification Methylases, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, MicroRNAs, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, SOXB1 Transcription Factors, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review