Cited by 222Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis research

You Are What You Host: Microbiome Modulation of the Aging Process

Open access
Heintz, Caroline, Mair, William·2014·Cell

Abstract

The critical impact that microbiota have on health and disease makes the interaction between host and microbiome increasingly important as we evaluate therapeutics. Here, we highlight growing evidence that, beyond disease, microbes also affect the most fundamental of host physiological phenotypes, the rate of aging itself.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.025

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gut microbial ecosystem changes with aging, with Bifidobacteria decreasing and facultative anaerobes such as Streptococci, Staphylococci, Enterococci and Enterobacteria increasing.

    “The microbial composition and diversity of the gut ecosystem changes with aging [10], as Bifidobacteria have been reported to decrease [11], while facultative anaerobes, including Streptococci, Staphylococci, Enterococci and Enterobacteria, increase with age [12]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Guo L Jasper H 2013 Cell In Press
  2. Martin-Montalvo A Mercken EM Mitchell SJ Palacios HH Mote PL Scheibye-Knudsen M Gomes AP Ward TM Minor RK Blouin MJ 2013 Nat Commun 4 2192 23900241 PMC3736576

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heintz, C., & Mair, W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mair, William
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
156
Issue
3
Pages
408-411
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095090113
Cited by
222
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 12
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG044346)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
microbiome, aging, host-microbe interactions, microbiota modulation, host physiology, age-related diseases, therapeutics
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Humans, Longevity, Models, Animal, Metagenome, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review