CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural and Mechanistic Basis of PAM-Dependent Spacer Acquisition in CRISPR-Cas Systems

Wang, Jiuyu, Li, Jiazhi, Zhao, Hongtu, Sheng, Gang, Wang, Min, Yin, Maolu, Wang, Yanli·2015·Cell
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tyrosine residues (Tyr22) in Cas1 subunits bracket the foreign genetic material, acting as a ruler that limits the central dsDNA region of the protospacer to a length of 23 nucleotides.

    “Tyrosine residues (Tyr22) in Cas1 subunits bracket the foreign genetic material, acting as a ruler that limits the central dsDNA region of the protospacer to a length of 23 nucleotides (nt) [20,27].”

    From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Anders, 2014, Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease, Nature, 513, 569, 10.1038/nature13579 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arslan, 2014, Detection and characterization of spacer integration intermediates in type I-E CRISPR-Cas system, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 7884, 10.1093/nar/gku510 · DOI
  3. Babu, 2011, A dual function of the CRISPR-Cas system in bacterial antivirus immunity and DNA repair, Mol. Microbiol., 79, 484, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07465.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barrangou, 2014, CRISPR-Cas systems: Prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity, Mol. Cell, 54, 234, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barrangou, 2007, CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes, Science, 315, 1709, 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Beloglazova, 2008, A novel family of sequence-specific endoribonucleases associated with the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 20361, 10.1074/jbc.M803225200 · DOI
  7. Brouns, 2008, Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes, Science, 321, 960, 10.1126/science.1159689 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Datsenko, 2012, Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system, Nat. Commun., 3, 945, 10.1038/ncomms1937 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Deveau, 2008, Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus, J. Bacteriol., 190, 1390, 10.1128/JB.01412-07 · DOI
  10. Díez-Villaseñor, 2013, CRISPR-spacer integration reporter plasmids reveal distinct genuine acquisition specificities among CRISPR-Cas I-E variants of Escherichia coli, RNA Biol., 10, 792, 10.4161/rna.24023 · DOI
  11. Fineran, 2012, Memory of viral infections by CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems: acquisition of new information, Virology, 434, 202, 10.1016/j.virol.2012.10.003 · DOI
  12. Garneau, 2010, The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA, Nature, 468, 67, 10.1038/nature09523 · DOI
  13. Goren, 2012, Experimental definition of a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic duplicon in Escherichia coli, J. Mol. Biol., 423, 14, 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.037 · DOI
  14. Gunderson, 2015, Nuclease activity of Legionella pneumophila Cas2 promotes intracellular infection of amoebal host cells, Infect. Immun., 83, 1008, 10.1128/IAI.03102-14 · DOI
  15. Hale, 2009, RNA-guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex, Cell, 139, 945, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.040 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Heler, 2015, Cas9 specifies functional viral targets during CRISPR-Cas adaptation, Nature, 519, 199, 10.1038/nature14245 · DOI
  17. Horvath, 2008, Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus, J. Bacteriol., 190, 1401, 10.1128/JB.01415-07 · DOI
  18. Ka, 2014, Structural and functional characterization of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas2 protein under different pH conditions, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 451, 152, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.087 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2013, Crystal structure of Cas1 from Archaeoglobus fulgidus and characterization of its nucleolytic activity, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 441, 720, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.122 · DOI
  20. Levy, 2015, CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA, Nature, 520, 505, 10.1038/nature14302 · DOI
  21. Makarova, 2011, Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9, 467, 10.1038/nrmicro2577 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Marraffini, 2008, CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA, Science, 322, 1843, 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mojica, 2009, Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system, Microbiology, 155, 733, 10.1099/mic.0.023960-0 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Nam, 2012, Double-stranded endonuclease activity in Bacillus halodurans clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated Cas2 protein, J. Biol. Chem., 287, 35943, 10.1074/jbc.M112.382598 · DOI
  25. Nuñez, 2014, Cas1-Cas2 complex formation mediates spacer acquisition during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 21, 528, 10.1038/nsmb.2820 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nuñez, 2015, Integrase-mediated spacer acquisition during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, Nature, 519, 193, 10.1038/nature14237 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Paez-Espino, 2013, Strong bias in the bacterial CRISPR elements that confer immunity to phage, Nat. Commun., 4, 1430, 10.1038/ncomms2440 · DOI
  28. Pougach, 2010, Transcription, processing and function of CRISPR cassettes in Escherichia coli, Mol. Microbiol., 77, 1367, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07265.x · DOI
  29. Rollie, 2015, Intrinsic sequence specificity of the Cas1 integrase directs new spacer acquisition, eLife, 4, e08716, 10.7554/eLife.08716 · DOI
  30. Samai, 2010, Structure of a CRISPR-associated protein Cas2 from Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun., 66, 1552, 10.1107/S1744309110039801 · DOI
  31. Swarts, 2012, CRISPR interference directs strand specific spacer acquisition, PLoS ONE, 7, e35888, 10.1371/journal.pone.0035888 · DOI
  32. van der Oost, 2014, Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 12, 479, 10.1038/nrmicro3279 · DOI
  33. Wiedenheft, 2009, Structural basis for DNase activity of a conserved protein implicated in CRISPR-mediated genome defense, Structure, 17, 904, 10.1016/j.str.2009.03.019 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Yosef, 2012, Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, 5569, 10.1093/nar/gks216 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Yosef, 2013, DNA motifs determining the efficiency of adaptation into the Escherichia coli CRISPR array, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 14396, 10.1073/pnas.1300108110 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., Li, J., Zhao, H., Sheng, G., Wang, M., Yin, M., & Wang, Y.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
163
Issue
4
Pages
840-853
ISSN
0092-8674
DOI
10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.008
Cited by
257
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review