CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of the role of Disabled-2 in nerve growth factor-mediated neurite outgrowth and cellular signalling

Huang, Ching-Hui, Cheng, Ju-Chien, Chen, Jin-Chung, Tseng, Ching-Ping·2007·Cellular Signalling
DOI 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.01.019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Disabled-2 (DAB2) is an adapter protein that plays a key role in cell proliferation and differentiation. We reported here that DAB2 is expressed in various regions of rat central nervous system and is most abundant in the olfactory bulb. The up-regulation of DAB2 upon 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine-induced spinal cord lesion implicates that DAB2 may participate in the regulation of neuronal plasticity. To investigate DAB2 function in the regulation of neurite outgrowth, the rat p59 and p82 form of DAB2 was individually and stably expressed in the PC12 cells. Both p59 and p82 inhibited nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced neurite outgrowth concomitantly with a decrease in the expression of neuron-specific cytoskeleton protein beta-tubulin III. To unveil the molecular mechanism of DAB2 in NGF signaling, we found that RhoA-GTPase activity was up-regulated in DAB2 stable lines whereas the Ras/MAPK and PI3-kinase/Akt signaling was not affected. The inhibitory effect of DAB2 on NGF-mediated neurite outgrowth was reversed by the pretreatment of Rho-kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y27632, implicating that DAB2 modulates RhoA/ROCK signaling. Together, this study defines a role of DAB2 in the control of neuronal plasticity and demonstrates for the first time that DAB2 is a negative regulator in NGF-mediated neurite outgrowth.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.01.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Nikolic, 2002, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 34, 731, 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00167-4 · DOI
  2. Kalil, 2005, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 15, 521, 10.1016/j.conb.2005.08.005 · DOI
  3. Levi-Montalcini, 1987, EMBO J., 6, 1145, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02347.x · DOI
  4. Huang, 2003, Ann. Rev. Biochem., 72, 609, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161629 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gertler, 1989, Cell, 58, 103, 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90407-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Howell, 1997, EMBO J., 16, 121, 10.1093/emboj/16.1.121 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Trommsdorff, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 33556, 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33556 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Howell, 1999, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 5179, 10.1128/MCB.19.7.5179 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Yun, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 36572, 10.1074/jbc.M304384200 · DOI
  10. Mok, 1994, Gynecol. Oncol., 52, 247, 10.1006/gyno.1994.1040 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Tseng, 1998, Endocrinology, 139, 3542, 10.1210/endo.139.8.6159 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Xu, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 14184, 10.1074/jbc.270.23.14184 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hocevar, 2001, EMBO J., 20, 2789, 10.1093/emboj/20.11.2789 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Zhou, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 27793, 10.1074/jbc.M102803200 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rosenbauer, 2002, EMBO J., 21, 211, 10.1093/emboj/21.3.211 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Huang, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 42279, 10.1074/jbc.M402540200 · DOI
  17. Huang, 2006, J. Cell Sci., 119, 4420, 10.1242/jcs.03195 · DOI
  18. Zhou, 2005, Cancer Res., 65, 9906, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1481 · DOI
  19. Tseng, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 31981, 10.1074/jbc.274.45.31981 · DOI
  20. Li, 2001, Anesth. Analg., 92, 1563, 10.1097/00000539-200106000-00043 · DOI
  21. Tseng, 2001, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 285, 129, 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5133 · DOI
  22. Yamaguchi, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 18977, 10.1074/jbc.M100254200 · DOI
  23. Lledo, 2006, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 7, 179, 10.1038/nrn1867 · DOI
  24. Moon, 2005, Neurosci. Lett., 378, 88, 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Marsh, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 163, 999, 10.1083/jcb.200309036 · DOI
  26. Musatov, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 3627, 10.1073/pnas.0308289101 · DOI
  27. Corbit, 1999, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 4209, 10.1128/MCB.19.6.4209 · DOI
  28. Luo, 2000, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 1, 173, 10.1038/35044547 · DOI
  29. Paterson, 1990, J. Cell Biol., 111, 1001, 10.1083/jcb.111.3.1001 · DOI
  30. Ridley, 1992, Cell, 70, 401, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90164-8 · DOI
  31. Kozma, 1995, Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 1942, 10.1128/MCB.15.4.1942 · DOI
  32. Nobes, 1995, Cell, 81, 53, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90370-4 · DOI
  33. Sebok, 1999, J. Neurochem., 73, 949, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730949.x · DOI
  34. Ahmed, 2005, Mol. Cell. Neurosci., 28, 509, 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.11.002 · DOI
  35. Neumann, 2002, J. Neurosci., 22, 854, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00854.2002 · DOI
  36. Fournier, 2003, J. Neurosci., 23, 1416, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01416.2003 · DOI
  37. Kobayashi, 2004, J. Neurosci., 24, 3480, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0295-04.2004 · DOI
  38. Mueller, 2005, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 4, 387, 10.1038/nrd1719 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Huang, C.-H., Cheng, J.-C., Chen, J.-C., & Tseng, C.-P.
Venue
Cellular Signalling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1339-1347
ISSN
0898-6568
DOI
10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.01.019
Cited by
29
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review