Cited by 75Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIon Channels and ReceptorsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

In Vivo Interrogation of Spinal Mechanosensory Circuits

Open access
Christensen, Amelia J., Iyer, Shrivats M., François, Amaury, Vyas, Saurabh, Ramakrishnan, Charu, Vesuna, Sam, Deisseroth, Karl, Scherrer, Grégory +1 more·2016·Cell Reports

Abstract

Spinal dorsal horn circuits receive, process, and transmit somatosensory information. To understand how specific components of these circuits contribute to behavior, it is critical to be able to directly modulate their activity in unanesthetized in vivo conditions. Here, we develop experimental tools that enable optogenetic control of spinal circuitry in freely moving mice using commonly available materials. We use these tools to examine mechanosensory processing in the spinal cord and observe that optogenetic activation of somatostatin-positive interneurons facilitates both mechanosensory and itch-related behavior, while reversible chemogenetic inhibition of these neurons suppresses mechanosensation. These results extend recent findings regarding the processing of mechanosensory information in the spinal cord and indicate the potential for activity-induced release of the somatostatin neuropeptide to affect processing of itch. The spinal implant approach we describe here is likely to enable a wide range of studies to elucidate spinal circuits underlying pain, touch, itch, and movement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.010

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Reln dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-8, Excit-9, Excit-10, and Excit-11 and expressed markers indicative of a role in chemical itch sensation.

    “The Reln dorsal, excitatory family was comprised of Excit-8, Excit-9, Excit-10, and Excit-11 and expressed markers indicative of a role in chemical itch sensation58–62.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, A. J., Iyer, S. M., François, A., Vyas, S., Ramakrishnan, C., Vesuna, S., Deisseroth, K., Scherrer, G., & Delp, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Scherrer, Grégory
  • Delp, Scott L.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1699-1710
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2547032004
Cited by
75
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NIH (R01-NS080954, DA031777)
  • Stanford Bio-X NeuroVentures
  • Texas Instruments Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research Fellowship
  • Siebel Scholars Foundation
  • Rita Allen Foundation
  • American Pain Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dorsal horn, mechanosensing, somatostatin interneurons, optogenetic stimulation, chemogenetic inhibition, pruritus, spinal implants, freely moving mice, somatosensory processing, spinal cord circuits
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Histamine, Interneurons, Light, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pruritus, Somatostatin, Spinal Cord, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Optical Fibers, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review