Cited by 42Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors control encoding and retrieval of associative recognition memory through plasticity in the medial prefrontal cortex

Open access
Sabec, Marie H., Wonnacott, Susan, Warburton, E. Clea, Bashir, Zafar I.·2018·Cell Reports

Abstract

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) expressed in the medial prefrontal cortex have critical roles in cognitive function. However, whether nAChRs are required for associative recognition memory and the mechanisms by which nAChRs may contribute to mnemonic processing are not known. We demonstrate that nAChRs in the prefrontal cortex exhibit subtype-specific roles in associative memory encoding and retrieval. We present evidence that these separate roles of nAChRs may rely on bidirectional modulation of plasticity at synaptic inputs to the prefrontal cortex that are essential for associative recognition memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.016

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabec, M. H., Wonnacott, S., Warburton, E. C., & Bashir, Z. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Sabec, Marie H.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
22
Issue
13
Pages
3409-3415
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795260584
Cited by
42
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (206401/Z/17/Z)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L001896/1, BB/J014400/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, medial prefrontal cortex, associative recognition memory, memory encoding, memory retrieval, synaptic plasticity, cholinergic modulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Male, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Receptors, Nicotinic, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, AMPA, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review